Yes, i also find Bazille amazing and it sure can do some things P900 cannot but the sounds i love and want to use there Bazille cannot deliver for me and especially the saturation and FX are much better in P900 for my taste. But i really do not like spring reverbs for some reason. But i love plate reverbs so maybe that is another thing for me. And i really felt in love with the analog delay as well and you have 2 of them inside P900. It is just pure cream for my earspdxindy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:07 pmThese things are very much individual... the way you feel about P900 is how I feel about Bazille... Bazille just does it for me. It sounds more alive to me than other soft synths.
I'd like to explore P900 more but there is not an OSX VST version so it cannot be used in Bitwig.
There are so many greats synth out there and great that they all have a different character (and U-he synths and P900 f.e. really has much character).
. I'm out of this business now but it's fun to come back and read this conversation. P900 uses lots of tricks to emulate or mimic behavior in analog synths. Some mentioned here like small parameter randomization that help polyphonic sounds in particular, or others like DC-blockers that emulate analog connections and help to keep the low end in check, or drift that is completely random but with a statistical center, and yes, gain staging throughout. The oscillators are high resolution alias free and the entire engine is oversampled with the output going through a high quality decimation filter (polyphase FIR/blackman window). I spent two years in my basement studio to try and infuse the characteristics of vintage (and some new) analogs I had as references into P900. Fun times. Some of that worked well, but I believe the key is attention to lots and lots of little details.
