additive VST
-
- KVRAF
- 1701 posts since 25 Jul, 2009
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
The usual suspects - Falcon and HALion - can do additive, as well as almost anything else.
That said, I think the best additive synth is Loom II. And Harmor as second.
That said, I think the best additive synth is Loom II. And Harmor as second.
Fernando (FMR)
-
- Banned
- 4558 posts since 21 Mar, 2020
There are lots of additive vsts both free and commercial. Maybe you can find something here:
http://www.vst4free.com/index.php?s_key ... mit=Search
http://www.vst4free.com/index.php?s_key ... mit=Search
Last edited by Erisian on Wed Apr 15, 2020 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Banned
- 4558 posts since 21 Mar, 2020
This attitude is stale as hell!
-
- KVRAF
- 3505 posts since 27 Dec, 2002 from North East England
Same here, though I'd reverse the order. I'd definitely recommend Loom 2 over Harmor for someone new to additive though. It's a lot easier to find your way around, to see what each module is doing, and it's faster to both learn and work with. Harmor is really strong when it comes to resynthesising existing audio and bending it in all manner of weird and wonderful ways, but I tend to use Loom 2 when it comes to making sounds from scratch.fmr wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2020 12:39 pmThat said, I think the best additive synth is Loom II. And Harmor as second.
- Banned
- 1792 posts since 8 Sep, 2019 from Calenberg
RAZOR blows everything out of the water.
-
- KVRist
- 70 posts since 20 Dec, 2014 from up north
Also, Arturia Synclavier V is a combination of additive and FM,
Native Instruments Razor (Used inside Reaktor),
and many more, including Audio Damage Phosphor and some of the Virsyn synths. Alchemy includes additive synthesis.
As far as I understand, Hammond organs are in a sense additive.
Take a look at this article: https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques ... -synthesis
Native Instruments Razor (Used inside Reaktor),
and many more, including Audio Damage Phosphor and some of the Virsyn synths. Alchemy includes additive synthesis.
As far as I understand, Hammond organs are in a sense additive.
Take a look at this article: https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques ... -synthesis
-
- KVRist
- 208 posts since 5 Oct, 2014 from Rome
+ 1svart wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2020 1:01 pm Also, Arturia Synclavier V is a combination of additive and FM,
Native Instruments Razor (Used inside Reaktor),
and many more, including Audio Damage Phosphor and some of the Virsyn synths. Alchemy includes additive synthesis.
As far as I understand, Hammond organs are in a sense additive.
Take a look at this article: https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques ... -synthesis
Organs are additive
- KVRAF
- 2034 posts since 30 Mar, 2008 from MN, USA
There are many additive synthesizers in that many of them use additive oscillators. That is, the waveforms are made by doing a fast fourier transform on a set of partials. Thorn and Fathom for example.
CLAP Software Database: https://clapdb.tech. KVR Discussion Topic.
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Oh yes... How did I forget that?svart wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2020 1:01 pm Also, Arturia Synclavier V is a combination of additive and FM,
Amd CMI V also can do additive as well.
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Using a waveform built by adding partials doesn't make a synth additive. Once done, the waveform is fixed.teilo wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2020 1:09 pm There are many additive synthesizers in that many of them use additive oscillators. That is, the waveforms are made by doing a fast fourier transform on a set of partials. Thorn and Fathom for example.
In additive synthesis, each partial has its own envelope, that changes independently over time. That's what makes the audio spectrum evolve.
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRian
- 736 posts since 8 May, 2002 from ... , germany
-
- KVRAF
- 6366 posts since 8 Jun, 2009
And yet it produces more relevant results than a list of FM synths.
-
- Banned
- 4558 posts since 21 Mar, 2020
I made it clear in my post that I don't know the boundaries. I had been under the impression that FM synthesis is additive. Excuse me for being wrong! I am also aware that definitions change as we become more particular so maybe I am not alone and you are not so right. What I do have that you clearly don't is a friendly attitude towards strangers. I'll tell you what - why don't we abandon forums completely and not discuss anything, after all, we have Google to talk to don't we?
