Well, they are your words, and they do appear in the same paragraph. I would think you had swept them together fairly well yourself.jmh wrote:I don't blame you for misunderstanding me though, I'm ramblingBut please, sweeping two issues like this together because of the word generalisation exists in both...
Your explanation did help clarify things. Thanks.
Come on, it seems like there are particular issues you want me to discuss. What are those particular issues? I don't want to have to read and respond to each and every line that J&H wrote, in order to satisfy this hunger of yours. (No, not that hunger.jmh wrote:Yet again, should I do the reading for you? I saw a lot of sensible, UI design related issues mentioned by him. You're free to ignore the parts you don't feel like discussing, I'm just kind of surprised that people ignored everything he said and instead went the route of "he has an attitude problem".McLilith wrote:Remind me about these issues of his that I have supposedly ignored. What exactly were they? I'll be happy to respond to them, if you point them out specifically.
I'm really starting to run out of time to spend on this, so please let me know which particular issues you wanted discussed, okay?
It's odd that several other people noticed his tone of ridicule, but you didn't. I'll get back to you with a followup post about what exactly he said that I found to be "counter-productive" and demeaning.jmh wrote:But hey, tell you what... since you're the one accusing him of all this, could you do the right thing and post a similar post as we're now doing, which illustrates how J&H ridiculed you for no reason, started calling you names and so on? At least that would prove your point, the one I'm desperately disagreeing with
I'm pretty sure it doesn't serve the purpose of this thread, but I'll not get to advance the purpose of this thread until I get past this, or so it seems.jmh wrote:Last... don't get me wrong. I love these sort of discussionsIt always helps when the other party is being rational and polite, hence I'm engaged in this with you. Dunno if it serves any purpose to the thread though
I don't think I misinterpreted J&H, but I'll look over this long thread again, and check for any signs that I did. Remember, it's entirely possible that he said something in an awkward or ambiguous manner, or said something he didn't really mean to say. If that's the case, it certainly isn't my fault that any "confusion" came into the conversation. It's also possible that he's just a rude person, and you just don't see that. Have you ever considered that possibliity?jmh wrote:Yes and no. You see, the thing is that from your analysis I get the feeling you do know something about this. So naturally, I'm interested in knowing more. For all I care, I could be talking to a dog, but at the same time I could be as well talking to my favorite UI designer. Wonders of the internet
I guess I was asking it mainly though because of this... You're accusing J&H of things he didn't say in his postings, he didn't imply or you just misinterpreted.
There is certainly some justification for the notion, since several other people have gotten that impression.
It was because of the way that he was ridiculing the value of Dystonia's graphics work without even first seeing any of it. When J&H started on the topic of Dystonia's web site, I decided to click on the "www" link next to J&H's forum name. I thought that I would extend more courtesty to J&H than he was extending to Dystonia, by at least viewing some of J&H's work before I critiqued it.jmh wrote:Seeing you shred the mockup made me think "but why?
After I saw the web page and the GUI, I gave a blunt, but honest assessment of his web site and GUI. I absolutely believe he made himself "fair game" for the frankness of my critique. He certainly didn't seem to feel any need to "sugar-coat" his comments toward us, so I didn't sugar-coat the critique.
It seemed fair to me.
You're starting to scare me a little...jmh wrote:...I don't have any negative feelings toward McLilith, quite the opposite...
McLilith
