Solo STRINGS, yeah it’s not there
orchestral libraries advice
-
- KVRian
- 597 posts since 29 Nov, 2005
No you're correct, that's my mistake - I'd read somewhere that core was the same as pro except for the multiple mic positions, but there are obviously more differences. The string "leader" patches are indeed unavailable in core.Scarlet Pumpernickel wrote: Wed Jun 24, 2020 4:29 pm @cleverr1 Are you sure, there are any solo strings in the BBCSO Core, because I didn't find any on the product page:
https://spitfireaudio.zendesk.com/hc/en ... O-contain-
I would gladly be proven wrong on this.
I jumped on the pro version when it was discounted at £679 and at £280 more than the regular price of core I didn't do a detailed comparison. Core was also a steal at £299 at the time.
-
Scarlet Pumpernickel Scarlet Pumpernickel https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=402106
- KVRist
- 266 posts since 30 Jul, 2017
Yeah, if the solo strings were there, BBCSO Core would be a a done deal for me, but as it is I'm looking more towards the Albion ONE.
EDIT: Although there's "Tableau Solo Strings" on sale right now (89Eur); don't know how well they will blend BBCSO.
EDIT: Although there's "Tableau Solo Strings" on sale right now (89Eur); don't know how well they will blend BBCSO.
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 432 posts since 9 Nov, 2018 from Colorado
I appreciate the advice of everyone in this thread.
I've been exploring options and am experiencing a bit of choice paralysis! I think, for now, I am going to work with what I have, what is available for free, and so on, while I learn more, and if I am still interested around Black Friday or Christmas, maybe I'll do something then. For one thing, my computer is old and I don't know how well it will handle some of those big libraries. It is a Core i5 2500 with 16GB of RAM and only about 400GB of storage to spare. I bought it in 2011! If I were to get a serious library, I'd surely have to upgrade my machine also. Altogether, that's more money than I can spend on this stuff right now!
On a different note, has anyone experimented much with a physically modeled violin, such as Serenade III, which you can get for free from the user library if you have Reaktor? To my uneducated ear, it sounds fantastically realistic. I'm amazed it's free. Perhaps programming it to perform realistically would be too cumbersome though. I guess with sample libraries, we benefit from the ability of the performers to properly play their instruments. This physically modeled violin is like an instrument that we must learn to play properly ourselves! I wonder if anyone has done serious work with it. It seems that one could put together a library of bowing patterns for it as something like automation items in Reaper.
I've been exploring options and am experiencing a bit of choice paralysis! I think, for now, I am going to work with what I have, what is available for free, and so on, while I learn more, and if I am still interested around Black Friday or Christmas, maybe I'll do something then. For one thing, my computer is old and I don't know how well it will handle some of those big libraries. It is a Core i5 2500 with 16GB of RAM and only about 400GB of storage to spare. I bought it in 2011! If I were to get a serious library, I'd surely have to upgrade my machine also. Altogether, that's more money than I can spend on this stuff right now!
On a different note, has anyone experimented much with a physically modeled violin, such as Serenade III, which you can get for free from the user library if you have Reaktor? To my uneducated ear, it sounds fantastically realistic. I'm amazed it's free. Perhaps programming it to perform realistically would be too cumbersome though. I guess with sample libraries, we benefit from the ability of the performers to properly play their instruments. This physically modeled violin is like an instrument that we must learn to play properly ourselves! I wonder if anyone has done serious work with it. It seems that one could put together a library of bowing patterns for it as something like automation items in Reaper.
-
- KVRian
- 597 posts since 29 Nov, 2005
Whilst you're reviewing the bigger libraries you could fill in the Spitfire questionnaire and get BBCSO Discover for free. You get 35 instruments covering 47 different articulations and it's a tiny 200MB. They'll also give you a free template for your DAW. To me it looks great for sketching out ideas quickly, and it's free. What's not to like? 
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 432 posts since 9 Nov, 2018 from Colorado
I already filled it out and am waiting to get the free library, but thanks anyway for the suggestion!cleverr1 wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:46 pm...you could fill in the Spitfire questionnaire and get BBCSO Discover for free.
-
Scarlet Pumpernickel Scarlet Pumpernickel https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=402106
- KVRist
- 266 posts since 30 Jul, 2017
Also with Discover you'll get $50 off the BBCSO Core.
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 432 posts since 9 Nov, 2018 from Colorado
Is that in addition to the current 30% off for first-timers sale?Scarlet Pumpernickel wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:26 pm Also with Discover you'll get $50 off the BBCSO Core.
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 432 posts since 9 Nov, 2018 from Colorado
I was experimenting this morning with programming the free Serenade III physically modeled strings in the Reaktor user library. The violin and cello in this are made this way, while the quieter background chords are NI's Session Strings 2.
https://soundcloud.com/user-260326741/r ... 3m6avG0SC8
I don't really know what I am doing yet, and I don't know much about how bowed instruments should sound, but this seems pretty realistic to me. As I learn to shape the automation curves to bow the notes, I am seeing a lot of potential for nuanced expression that probably wouldn't be possible with a sample library.
Putting my lacking composition skills aside, do you more experienced people find the basic sound of the instrument convincing?
Another advantage of physical modeling is that there is no noise from mics, amps, and whatnot.
One thing I notice is that the beginning of notes and the automation curves for bowing seemingly need to be advanced a bit on the timeline, as there is a bit of a delay.
https://soundcloud.com/user-260326741/r ... 3m6avG0SC8
I don't really know what I am doing yet, and I don't know much about how bowed instruments should sound, but this seems pretty realistic to me. As I learn to shape the automation curves to bow the notes, I am seeing a lot of potential for nuanced expression that probably wouldn't be possible with a sample library.
Putting my lacking composition skills aside, do you more experienced people find the basic sound of the instrument convincing?
Another advantage of physical modeling is that there is no noise from mics, amps, and whatnot.
One thing I notice is that the beginning of notes and the automation curves for bowing seemingly need to be advanced a bit on the timeline, as there is a bit of a delay.
-
Scarlet Pumpernickel Scarlet Pumpernickel https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=402106
- KVRist
- 266 posts since 30 Jul, 2017
I can not say for sure as I haven't pulled the trigger yet. I believe, I'm mostly in a same boat as you are - looking for a good starting symphonic library. I am currently also considering Nucleus (https://www.audioimperia.com/products/nucleus) that should go on sale eventually. It offers ensembles, sections and some soloists (e.g no clarinet) with to microphone mixes, but lacks in articulations. To me it sounds at least very decent.Scarlet Pumpernickel wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:26 pm Also with Discover you'll get $50 off the BBCSO Core.
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 432 posts since 9 Nov, 2018 from Colorado
How about now? I used a different reverb treatment (convolution instead of CloudSeed), tried to spatialize the violin and oboe a bit, cut out the compression and saturation, and cut out the Session Strings background so you can better Serenade III.szurcio wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:57 pm It sounds more like an electric violin, not a regular violin.
https://soundcloud.com/user-260326741/r ... XrO76uG8Ku
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 432 posts since 9 Nov, 2018 from Colorado
Scarlet Pumpernickel wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 6:39 pmI can not say for sure as I haven't pulled the trigger yet. I believe, I'm mostly in a same boat as you are - looking for a good starting symphonic library. I am currently also considering Nucleus (https://www.audioimperia.com/products/nucleus) that should go on sale eventually. It offers ensembles, sections and some soloists (e.g no clarinet) with to microphone mixes, but lacks in articulations. To me it sounds at least very decent.Scarlet Pumpernickel wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:26 pm Also with Discover you'll get $50 off the BBCSO Core.
Okay, thanks! Yeah, I was looking at Nucleus as well.
-
- KVRer
- 25 posts since 3 May, 2019
It's honestly just easier to hire someone on fiverr or something with a mediocre performance. Solo violins are impossible to get right unless you're playing to the exact strengths of a library or plugin.JO512 wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:13 pm On a different note, has anyone experimented much with a physically modeled violin, such as Serenade III, which you can get for free from the user library if you have Reaktor?
The modeled string plugins out there are actually very impressive, but they take an immense amount of work to get sounding close to correct.
