INTEL ist KAPUT
-
- KVRAF
- 35718 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
One day I gotta find out what the motivation behind this hardware hater/fanboyism thing is. Probably another big vs. small, David vs. Goliath complex thing again.
Nice click bait thread BTW. Bet you find a lot of followers here.
Nice click bait thread BTW. Bet you find a lot of followers here.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3369 posts since 16 Jan, 2005 from Ottawa, Ontario
Not Fanboyism. Intel is well know for really shitty business practices stifling AMD sales around the world. It's like they have an entire department devoted to MONSATOism. They also were charging THEIR "fanboys" DOUBLE the performance/watt compared to AMD... evidenced by their ability to drop their prices in half when they really started to feel the heat, into figures that were AMD price points.
Slowing down the advent of greater computer prowess hurts everyone - this is my biggest beef.
I also HATE being gouged - another major beef.
If AMD had given up on HPC and forgone Ryzen, you would all be hailing the "new 12 core monster chip" being touted by Intel in 2020. Instead the Threadripper suddenly exposed huge CPUs that Intel was going to announce years from now after they had milked everyone for everything they had, just like they did before - 50% price hike for 10% improvement in performance.
Not fanboy - price/performance concerned - and happy to see an ogre on his back.
Slowing down the advent of greater computer prowess hurts everyone - this is my biggest beef.
I also HATE being gouged - another major beef.
If AMD had given up on HPC and forgone Ryzen, you would all be hailing the "new 12 core monster chip" being touted by Intel in 2020. Instead the Threadripper suddenly exposed huge CPUs that Intel was going to announce years from now after they had milked everyone for everything they had, just like they did before - 50% price hike for 10% improvement in performance.
Not fanboy - price/performance concerned - and happy to see an ogre on his back.
- KVRian
- 1266 posts since 6 Jun, 2016
I'd be willing to bet that Intel, AMD and ARM are in league with each other. Meaning, that to some extent they collude, to fix the market, prices, trends, etc.--much like MS and Apl. have done.
Does anyone here have access to financial stuff, to ask a question like 'who are the sitting board members of these companies?'
I'd be willing to bet you'd see commons names, a lot.
So why not do coordinated stunts to explain events like Apl. Silcon, you know?
That's how I see it. That's why when I read a headline like "Intel's 7nm is Broken, Company Announces Delay Until 2022, 2023", I don't know how to take it. It could be a bizarre stunt.
Does anyone here have access to financial stuff, to ask a question like 'who are the sitting board members of these companies?'
I'd be willing to bet you'd see commons names, a lot.
So why not do coordinated stunts to explain events like Apl. Silcon, you know?
That's how I see it. That's why when I read a headline like "Intel's 7nm is Broken, Company Announces Delay Until 2022, 2023", I don't know how to take it. It could be a bizarre stunt.
- KVRAF
- 16887 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
For peace of mind: if AMD were three times the size of Intel, they'd do exactly the same.
This is just yer typical behaviour of a capitalistic market leader squeezing out its clients. Because they can.
This is just yer typical behaviour of a capitalistic market leader squeezing out its clients. Because they can.
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. 
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
- KVRian
- 1418 posts since 14 Apr, 2016 from Germany
FYI the word is "kaputt"..INTEL ist KAPUT

Intel® Core™ i9-9900K•Cubase 11•Presonus Eris E8 XT•Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 & Octopre•NI Kontrol S61 MK2•Steinberg CC121•Synthesizers: Arturia Casio Korg Roland Yamaha
- KVRian
- 1119 posts since 31 Aug, 2004
Your perspective does not include too much knowledge. Intel production technology is much more expansive than AMD. Intel CPUs are based on one chiplet where everything is included - Cores, caches, PCI lines). This technology is around twice as expansive as multi chiplet AMD tech.Debutante wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2020 3:13 am Not Fanboyism. Intel is well know for really shitty business practices stifling AMD sales around the world. It's like they have an entire department devoted to MONSATOism. They also were charging THEIR "fanboys" DOUBLE the performance/watt compared to AMD... evidenced by their ability to drop their prices in half when they really started to feel the heat, into figures that were AMD price points.
Slowing down the advent of greater computer prowess hurts everyone - this is my biggest beef.
I also HATE being gouged - another major beef.
If AMD had given up on HPC and forgone Ryzen, you would all be hailing the "new 12 core monster chip" being touted by Intel in 2020. Instead the Threadripper suddenly exposed huge CPUs that Intel was going to announce years from now after they had milked everyone for everything they had, just like they did before - 50% price hike for 10% improvement in performance.
Not fanboy - price/performance concerned - and happy to see an ogre on his back.
This is the reason that RAM addressing is still domain of Intel that still wins in DAW Bench VI test even with 14nm vs 7nm of AMD.
I think that standard x86 tech is close to over and new tech behind ARM introduced by Apple will be the way to go. Intel understood this and working on totally new generation of processor units. Even Intel is falling down a bit it is still a giant compared to AMD financial wise. I consider this "Ryzen" period similar to AthlonA64 vs Intel Pentium4. Intel strikes back soon
- KVRAF
- 10175 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
You've just described typical large business practice. They're all at it.Debutante wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2020 3:13 am Not Fanboyism. Intel is well know for really shitty business practices stifling AMD sales around the world. It's like they have an entire department devoted to MONSATOism. They also were charging THEIR "fanboys" DOUBLE the performance/watt compared to AMD... evidenced by their ability to drop their prices in half when they really started to feel the heat, into figures that were AMD price points.
Slowing down the advent of greater computer prowess hurts everyone - this is my biggest beef.
I also HATE being gouged - another major beef.w
If AMD had given up on HPC and forgone Ryzen, you would all be hailing the "new 12 core monster chip" being touted by Intel in 2020. Instead the Threadripper suddenly exposed huge CPUs that Intel was going to announce years from now after they had milked everyone for everything they had, just like they did before - 50% price hike for 10% improvement in performance.
Not fanboy - price/performance concerned - and happy to see an ogre on his back.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3369 posts since 16 Jan, 2005 from Ottawa, Ontario
poshook wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2020 9:06 amYour perspective does not include too much knowledge. Intel production technology is much more expansive than AMD. Intel CPUs are based on one chiplet where everything is included - Cores, caches, PCI lines). This technology is around twice as expansive as multi chiplet AMD tech.Debutante wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2020 3:13 am Not Fanboyism. Intel is well know for really shitty business practices stifling AMD sales around the world. It's like they have an entire department devoted to MONSATOism. They also were charging THEIR "fanboys" DOUBLE the performance/watt compared to AMD... evidenced by their ability to drop their prices in half when they really started to feel the heat, into figures that were AMD price points.
Slowing down the advent of greater computer prowess hurts everyone - this is my biggest beef.
I also HATE being gouged - another major beef.
If AMD had given up on HPC and forgone Ryzen, you would all be hailing the "new 12 core monster chip" being touted by Intel in 2020. Instead the Threadripper suddenly exposed huge CPUs that Intel was going to announce years from now after they had milked everyone for everything they had, just like they did before - 50% price hike for 10% improvement in performance.
Not fanboy - price/performance concerned - and happy to see an ogre on his back.
This is the reason that RAM addressing is still domain of Intel that still wins in DAW Bench VI test even with 14nm vs 7nm of AMD.
I think that standard x86 tech is close to over and new tech behind ARM introduced by Apple will be the way to go. Intel understood this and working on totally new generation of processor units. Even Intel is falling down a bit it is still a giant compared to AMD financial wise. I consider this "Ryzen" period similar to AthlonA64 vs Intel Pentium4. Intel strikes back soon
All well and good, and I think Intel's rebuttal will be fierce techwise - they are many factors richer, and have steadily produced better chips... and are you're trying to suggest that the Intel process is twice the cost of AMD? Then their pricing would make sense... but the suggestion that they haven't milked it sounds doubtful.
And kudos to AMD all the same, for finagling a way to make cheaper the process to produce within a tiny fraction, as of yet, just as powerful a chip. ARM is in all the headlines lately so yes, we'll wait and see...
... but what does any of that have to do with Intel BLOCKING sales of AMD merchandise?
-
- KVRAF
- 35718 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Of course not. That's why you start your thread with "HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!" and claim that "cheaters never prosper".
- KVRAF
- 8685 posts since 29 Sep, 2010 from Maui
Intel is definitely the evil empire, AMD however, IMO has always cut corners to attain their performance goals. I fell for the hype and went with them due to cost many times, in the end I was always disappointed one way or another. Finally, I ponied up for the evil empire chips and never regretted the decision. Hopefully with the Ryzen range of chips this is no longer the case, but for me, fool me once and all... *shrug
-
- KVRAF
- 35718 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Let's face it, everyone who succeeds in a competetive market is considered "evil" by the stupid people these days. Absolutely everyone. Including AMD, if they actually would have done a good job in the last 20-25 years.
Stupid is stupid.
- Beware the Quoth
- 35526 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
ARM are in a different market from Intel and AMD; they dont manufacture CPUs, their entire business model is in licensing their design to other companies to build their own proprietary variants. That's not 'fixing the market,' its closer to the opposite.lunardigs wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2020 3:26 am I'd be willing to bet that Intel, AMD and ARM are in league with each other. Meaning, that to some extent they collude, to fix the market, prices, trends, etc.--much like MS and Apl. have done.
And exactly what are MS and Apple supposed to be colluding over? Apple arent actually in the business or cloud computing markets, which is where MS makes 2/3 of its money. They're in the phone and app business.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- KVRAF
- 8685 posts since 29 Sep, 2010 from Maui
Well in my case, evil empire is more a term of endearment than anything else. For most I think,chk071 wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2020 10:37 amLet's face it, everyone who succeeds in a competetive market is considered "evil" by the stupid people these days. Absolutely everyone. Including AMD, if they actually would have done a good job in the last 20-25 years.
Stupid is stupid.
it's mostly just a figure of speech actually.
