Ohmboyz Infinity

[epiphaneia]

BTW feel free to expand on what you like best for the next release. We sure are reading. Someone suggested Open Beta next time. Thoughts vs private?

I think that boils down to the question how much feedback you want to handle. Open betas are more welcoming (as I as a beta tester am doing you guys a favour, I find "applying" for closed beta testing a bit weird, but maybe that's just me), but may lead to less focused feedback, invalid bug reports and a lot of noise on your end. Maybe a semi-open beta (no big application but limited number of participants)?

I'd also think that the right time to make a demo version available is now. Yeah, I guess that might annoy a few early bird buyers... but that seems a viable way to get some positive traction for what can be a great product after all. A few "wow!"s would be much needed after the -justified- complaints.

[audiot]

... I'd also think that the right time to make a demo version available is now.

+1

[jamcat]

These guys are really far up their own arses.

[jens]

These guys are really far up their own arses.

How so? By admitting they made mistakes and not everything went down as they anticipated it?

[carlosigls]

I have received an email from them in which they stop supporting Ohmboyz, which seems reasonable to me, what does not seem reasonable is that they ask me for 70 euros for the update.

[schpaeckulum]

I have received an email from them in which they stop supporting Ohmboyz, which seems reasonable to me, what does not seem reasonable is that they ask me for 70 euros for the update.

It's not an update. It's an entirely different plugin. If you don't want, don't.

[revvy]

These guys are really far up their own arses.

How do they do that? Asking for a friend.

[Red_Force]

i want to be refund it is possible ?

Mail us if not already done.

[Red_Force]

BTW feel free to expand on what you like best for the next release. We sure are reading. Someone suggested Open Beta next time. Thoughts vs private?

I think that boils down to the question how much feedback you want to handle. Open betas are more welcoming (as I as a beta tester am doing you guys a favour, I find "applying" for closed beta testing a bit weird, but maybe that's just me), but may lead to less focused feedback, invalid bug reports and a lot of noise on your end. Maybe a semi-open beta (no big application but limited number of participants)?

I'd also think that the right time to make a demo version available is now. Yeah, I guess that might annoy a few early bird buyers... but that seems a viable way to get some positive traction for what can be a great product after all. A few "wow!"s would be much needed after the -justified- complaints.

Yup and that sure will be part of our decision. But I was more asking about whether that's the kind of stuff you guys would be interested in. Free doesn't always mean people jump on it. I have not tracked what others plugins companies have been doing too accurately.

Demo is in the pipeline. For release or just after. But I'd *really* like to have it ready for release
(would it only be to have people stop saying "why that update price")

[Red_Force]

These guys are really far up their own arses.

How do they do that? Asking for a friend.

Many tricks on our sleeves.

[jens]

[DJErmac]

I'm on the fence. There's no delay I find perfect so I still am waiting for this one to reveal its final form, but on the other way something tells me it's never going to happen and maybe I should ask for a refund... Now this is a joke, the betatest started during the Jurassic era, right ?

[xx JPRacer xx]

Sorry if this was asked and answered before but what's the copy protection on this?

[vurt]

These guys are really far up their own arses.

How do they do that? Asking for a friend.

unsalted butter.

[Gamma-UT]

These guys are really far up their own arses.

How do they do that? Asking for a friend.

unsalted butter.

Is unsalted better than salted for this? Asking for a friend.