Voxengo TEOTE automatic spectral balancer plugin released

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Effects Discussion
RELATED
PRODUCTS
TEOTE$55.00Buy

Post

Hi Aleksey, thanks for including this interesting plugin in the premium membership. It woks very well, however, I have a gfeature request that would make it even more usable. Currently, the plugin adjust to a flat spetrum curve (in fact: a horizontal line), but it would be great to have a target curve editor (and some predefined target curves to select) so that it could work like a dynamic match eq. Maybe, even give the possibility to read spectrums that were saved in CurveEQ as targets.

Cheers, AKJ

Post

perpetual3 wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 11:51 am Since you don’t use deep learning, how are you learning the function from input?
Well, I can't reveal all the nuances. Basically, it's just an "analog-like" momentary spectrum estimation.
Image

Post

AKJ wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 1:52 pm Hi Aleksey, thanks for including this interesting plugin in the premium membership. It woks very well, however, I have a gfeature request that would make it even more usable. Currently, the plugin adjust to a flat spetrum curve (in fact: a horizontal line), but it would be great to have a target curve editor (and some predefined target curves to select) so that it could work like a dynamic match eq. Maybe, even give the possibility to read spectrums that were saved in CurveEQ as targets.

Cheers, AKJ
I do not find this feature particularly useful or important. You can apply the required EQ profile after TEOTE.
Image

Post

Aleksey Vaneev wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:22 pm
AKJ wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 1:52 pm Hi Aleksey, thanks for including this interesting plugin in the premium membership. It woks very well, however, I have a gfeature request that would make it even more usable. Currently, the plugin adjust to a flat spetrum curve (in fact: a horizontal line), but it would be great to have a target curve editor (and some predefined target curves to select) so that it could work like a dynamic match eq. Maybe, even give the possibility to read spectrums that were saved in CurveEQ as targets.

Cheers, AKJ
I do not find this feature particularly useful or important. You can apply the required EQ profile after TEOTE.
Looking closer at the plugin you seem to have integrated something a bit similar with the slope feature, so obviously you found it useful to have some control over the "target". Why not give full control? iZotope's Sculpture is based on predefined targets, letting the user have full control would give your plugin something that other plugins are lacking.

Post

AKJ wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:29 pm
Aleksey Vaneev wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:22 pm
AKJ wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 1:52 pm Hi Aleksey, thanks for including this interesting plugin in the premium membership. It woks very well, however, I have a gfeature request that would make it even more usable. Currently, the plugin adjust to a flat spetrum curve (in fact: a horizontal line), but it would be great to have a target curve editor (and some predefined target curves to select) so that it could work like a dynamic match eq. Maybe, even give the possibility to read spectrums that were saved in CurveEQ as targets.

Cheers, AKJ
I do not find this feature particularly useful or important. You can apply the required EQ profile after TEOTE.
Looking closer at the plugin you seem to have integrated something a bit similar with the slope feature, so obviously you found it useful to have some control over the "target". Why not give full control? iZotope's Sculpture is based on predefined targets, letting the user have full control would give your plugin something that other plugins are lacking.
Well, TEOTE is multi-band, and is discrete relative to the required EQ profile, may not be precise towards peak required gains. Secondly, TEOTE is not "hard precise" in applying a integrated profile (it is precise only relative to a momentary spectrum). Thirdly, fine-tuning a profile is as time-consuming as using an EQ. There's no real benefit in adding profiles to TEOTE.
Image

Post

Thanks Aleksey! This is a great plugin.

Post

Ploki wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 11:41 am
Aloysius wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 11:32 am I haven't had much of a chance to play with this yet, so bear with me please. :)

When you say: Applications/Contemporary music mastering ... does this mean the plugin follows a pink noise curve or something else? What settings should be used to follow a pink noise curve? Can we create profiles?
Slope -3 apparently nudges it towards pink noise :)
here's a quick capture with pink noise as source, feeding Gullfoss and TEOTE with default slope and -3 slope.
https://imgur.com/a/uKukS6x
Thanks for posting the pics but those some pretty extreme Gullfoss settings that most would not likely use. Are those GF settings what it took to match a Pink Noise reference and then you matched Teote to it??

Post

ElevateAudio wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:56 pm
Ploki wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 11:41 am
Aloysius wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 11:32 am I haven't had much of a chance to play with this yet, so bear with me please. :)

When you say: Applications/Contemporary music mastering ... does this mean the plugin follows a pink noise curve or something else? What settings should be used to follow a pink noise curve? Can we create profiles?
Slope -3 apparently nudges it towards pink noise :)
here's a quick capture with pink noise as source, feeding Gullfoss and TEOTE with default slope and -3 slope.
https://imgur.com/a/uKukS6x
Thanks for posting the pics but those some pretty extreme Gullfoss settings that most would not likely use. Are those GF settings what it took to match a Pink Noise reference and then you matched Teote to it??
i pushed both to the extreme - if you pull down gullfoss it just does less dB of more or less the same.
Image

Post

.,mnb
Last edited by codec_spurt on Fri Jan 21, 2022 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

Additional payment is not really needed. Premium Membership purchases are a minority, statistically it won't make much of a difference in income.
Image

Post

Another fantastic Voxengo plugin, I will absolutely be using this regularly from now on. It sounds fantastic. I'm also a Premium member, and this membership keeps paying off again and again. Thank you!

Post

damn i regret my good old crunchessor,i wish i never sold it. :(
i will try this new plugin, the dark GUI are really pleasant.
time for me to leave KVR.Bye bye ! 03/2022 :phones:

Post

Excellent plugin :love: I tried this on a drum group to tame resonances in the upper frequency spectrum. The results are great and in comparison to Soothe and DSEQ this plugin doesnt add latency, even in the oversampling modes :o Usability is good ... maybe it could be improved with multiple bands and a graphical editor similar to the others i've mentioned.

Im upgrading to premium membership now ... with 8 plugins in my account the upgrade is around 210 € and there were a few other Voxengo plugins on my list, that i always wanted to demo :party:

Excellent work!

Image

Post

Aleksey Vaneev wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2020 6:03 am Additional payment is not really needed. Premium Membership purchases are a minority, statistically it won't make much of a difference in income.
Thanks! I got the Premium Membership about 3 years ago, def one of the best computer music purchases I ever made. :clap:

Post

I compared TEOTE to DSEQ and MSpectralDynamics on the same track and definitely preferred TEOTE so I bought it. I found reducing the number of bands to 10 on TEOTE gave me better results on this track.

Purchasing TEOTE was a little tricky as the credit card company said the vendor requested additional verification. I had to answer a bunch of questions to validate my identity before the credit card company would let the charge go through. This is the first time I've had that happen.

Post Reply

Return to “Effects”