Dont know if this will be possible in realtime soon ... but damn - it sounds amazing! 2:00 to 2:20 is extremly impressing ...
Here's another clip:
Best thing is, that you can already use it. Upload a sample and transfer it into something else.
Physical modeling is dead! Google tone transfer is here ...
-
- KVRian
- 671 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Germany
Sorry for the sensational headline, but this is the most revolutionary thing i've seen in music technology Dont know if this will be possible in realtime soon ... but damn - it sounds amazing!
2:00 to 2:20 is extremly impressing ...
Here's another clip:
Best thing is, that you can already use it. Upload a sample and transfer it into something else.
Dont know if this will be possible in realtime soon ... but damn - it sounds amazing! 2:00 to 2:20 is extremly impressing ...
Here's another clip:
Best thing is, that you can already use it. Upload a sample and transfer it into something else.
Last edited by audiot on Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- addled muppet weed
- 111242 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
tell me in words 
-
- KVRAF
- 2514 posts since 28 Sep, 2012
Turn any sound into any other sound. Piano into violin. Voice into saxophone.
-
- addled muppet weed
- 111242 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
so as it says there "resynthesis"?perpetual3 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:00 pm Turn any sound into any other sound. Piano into violin. Voice into saxophone.
like weve had for a while?
i cant watch the vids at present, so have no idea if this is such a vast improvement on previous technologies?
is it playable or is it an offline sample conversion, then you get a sample?
-
- addled muppet weed
- 111242 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
-
- KVRAF
- 2719 posts since 2 Jul, 2010
Doesn't sound anything like what I use physical modelling for then.perpetual3 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:00 pm Turn any sound into any other sound. Piano into violin. Voice into saxophone.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 671 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Germany
I personally havent heard something that sounds comparable (or more realistic). I havent heard a physical modeling instrument that can deliver such detailed articulations. And no ... it's not playable in realtime. You have to upload a sample. If you can watch the vids again, then check out the saxophone in 2nd video and the violin in the first video.vurt wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:06 pmso as it says there "resynthesis"?perpetual3 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:00 pm Turn any sound into any other sound. Piano into violin. Voice into saxophone.
like weve had for a while?
i cant watch the vids at present, so have no idea if this is such a vast improvement on previous technologies?
is it playable or is it an offline sample conversion, then you get a sample?
Maybe someone who knows a bit about DSP stuff, could give an opinion on wether this will be available in realtime soon? I'm really curious ...
-
- KVRian
- 821 posts since 23 Mar, 2013
Resynthesis has been around for a while. Soundhack had it like 15 years ago and Spectralayers Cast/Mold is fantastic.
Haven’t watched the video so maybe there’s more to it. Just can’t be bothered
Also, yeah, not really comparable to physical modelling
Haven’t watched the video so maybe there’s more to it. Just can’t be bothered
Also, yeah, not really comparable to physical modelling
-
- KVRian
- 834 posts since 7 Dec, 2018 from Saint-Petersburg
I fed it with a piece of mantra chant and got four types of quick jazz-style farting. True story.
It needs to learn more
It needs to learn more
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 671 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Germany
Yes, maybe i should have written "multisampled insstruments are dead". But does it matter which technology delivers the most authentic sound? If you keep in mind that this is a new technology based on AI, i find the results extremly impressing.
Last edited by audiot on Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 671 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Germany
Oh ... 2 downvotes already. Sorry for bringing this thread up. I promise that my next topic will be something like "Synth X vs Synth Y" ... or something like that 
-
- KVRian
- 821 posts since 23 Mar, 2013
Maybe just change the name by removing physical modelling. It’s a bit misleading.
And you get people like me who love physical modelling coming in chests puffed ready for a brawl
And you get people like me who love physical modelling coming in chests puffed ready for a brawl
-
- Banned
- 887 posts since 3 Jul, 2016
NO way Physical modeling is dead!!! ----- IT s the FUTURE !! 
google should keep improving their search engines..too shite to replace the Vivaldi I use now...
...
on a serious note - it has some sound design poss.. but listening to the emulated instruments..
hmm....sounds absolute shit...and will never ever replace skilled musicians...waste of time..
but I guess googs hasto much $$$ so may as well waste a bit...
the short modular org...patch is cool ...at 3.50 - second Vid...N I C E !!
google should keep improving their search engines..too shite to replace the Vivaldi I use now...
...
on a serious note - it has some sound design poss.. but listening to the emulated instruments..
hmm....sounds absolute shit...and will never ever replace skilled musicians...waste of time..
but I guess googs hasto much $$$ so may as well waste a bit...
the short modular org...patch is cool ...at 3.50 - second Vid...N I C E !!
MPG X670E CARBON Ryzen 9 7900, 64Gb 6K DDR5 4x2tb Nvmes