it says right on the page you linked toTeksonik wrote: Fri Jun 04, 2021 1:52 am Does Zampler have a 32 bit version? It loads .sfz files and is a capable synthh as well.
https://www.zampler.de/
32 Bit SFZ Player?
- Banned
- 10729 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
- KVRAF
- 19774 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
It says.....
So a bit ambiguous. The image says 32/64 but the text below only says 64 bit.
Did you download the file ? I did and it only contains a single .dll and it's 64 bit:
I know there are other distributions of Zampler from for example Loopmasters so the question remains does Zampler have a 32 bit version?
I haven't used 32 bit in years so don't pay attention to such things but if someone is motivated to find a 32 bit version of Zampler they can do the leg work.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
-
- KVRist
- 243 posts since 5 May, 2020
I remember the transition from sfz to sfz+. IIRC, sfz+ was never free. I paid the $50 and felt like I got my $50 worth, being able to load a handful of samplesets using one plugin rather than a handful of copies of sfz. There was something else about it I liked but don't recall now. It's news to me that it didn't load .sfz files; I think I'd remember that, but can't swear by it. (Only fools are certain, and of that I'm certain! You can quote me on that.)
I think I have a standalone version of sfz+ somewhere, and if I can find it and run it, I'll verify. I was looking for the plugin version and couldn't find it, which is when I discovered Sforzando, so it's a good thing I couldn't find it. That was also the last straw to get me out of 32-bit and into 64-bit.
Oh yeah, I remember what was better about sfz+: it handled multi-core well. I had issues running sfz on multi-core processors. That's a clue about how long ago this happened!
I think I have a standalone version of sfz+ somewhere, and if I can find it and run it, I'll verify. I was looking for the plugin version and couldn't find it, which is when I discovered Sforzando, so it's a good thing I couldn't find it. That was also the last straw to get me out of 32-bit and into 64-bit.
Oh yeah, I remember what was better about sfz+: it handled multi-core well. I had issues running sfz on multi-core processors. That's a clue about how long ago this happened!
- KVRAF
- 19774 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
The RX refers to Rex import. Did the original not have .rex import? I don't remember it's been so long ago.
Is there someplace where the OP or anyone who wishes a 32 bit bit version can download it now ?
EDIT: I found a 32 bit version of ZamplerRX on an old system. It's dated 2014.
I don't know if I'd be allowed to share the .dll but if anyone really wants it let me know and I'll ask Richard if it's OK to share.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
-
- KVRAF
- 4584 posts since 21 Sep, 2005
-
- KVRist
- 243 posts since 5 May, 2020
No offense taken, and you're definitely correct that sfz+ did not support the sfz format. Also thanks for clarifying that there was a free promotion. Plus I was mistaken about the price; I bought it for $60, not $50.
