Best channel strip plugin that's NOT emulation of SSL, Neve, API, Amek, etc.

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Effects Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

MogwaiBoy wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 1:19 am
plexuss wrote: Mon Jul 12, 2021 11:39 pm
MogwaiBoy wrote: Mon Jul 12, 2021 10:04 pm Being over-exposed to your own music completely obliterates objectivity. You can no longer hear it how it would normally be heard by other people.
That's the the crux, I don't care how it would normally be heard by other people. I write and produce music for my own edification. With that there are very specific characteristics I want imparted in my music and over-all sound - there is no way I could rely on another person to achieve that for me. If my output works for other people, great. But if not, I don't really care. That is part of the freedom I achieve by decoupling the need for income from my music efforts. :D
I'm in full agreement with you! However, for purely technical things like "Is the high end of my song too strong?" because I've heard it 3000 times and my ears have accepted the harshness.... it is good to have an 'objective' opinion, like a mastering engineer's.

But yes, absolutely agree to make music for your own gratification first and foremost. If other people like it, that's merely a bonus :)
The other aspect that is important here, is that I am not just mixing to get a middle-of-the-road sound - I work the audio to get a particular sound and vibe. For those that know my work, they tell me that I have "a sound", that they like. One professional audio engineer feels I am "top class" in terms of my use of soundstage, clarity and bandwidth. Whether he's right I don't know, but those are areas I put considerable effort into. If I were to share mixing and mastering duties with other people I would not be able to acheive what I set out to acheive. I don't share that part of my work with other people, as is my prerogative. I do collaborate with other musician friends on songs, I mix and master for people if they want me to and I share my music on soundcloud and youtube (all for free). What I am saying is that the production quality of the audio is as important as the compositional quality in my music which doesn't lend itself well to sharing with others. I'm not fighting back, I'm just giving more detail as it may be and interesting or amusing anecdote to somebody...

'nuff a'dis!

Anyone try AO's Loaded. I used it recently on an important track to see if I could steer it where I wanted. I was pretty impressed. The gate was a nice surprised as it allowed me to add more "motion" in the dynamics - its an arp synth line with reverb, i could dial the gate in to gate in the reverb which allowed for more of this "motion" and a clearer sound by dialing down the reverb between notes. the other modules sounded pretty good in the mix. I didn't do any technical or detailed analysis.

Post

plexuss wrote: Mon Jul 12, 2021 6:27 pm Proof is in the pudding: www.soundcloud.com/musicofplexus
Nice music, Plexuss : )

I would share my Soundcloud* but most of it is demo quality produced with stock plugins or no plugins :lol:

(*if anyone's really interested you can PM me)

Post

MogwaiBoy wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 6:39 am
plexuss wrote: Mon Jul 12, 2021 6:27 pm Proof is in the pudding: www.soundcloud.com/musicofplexus
Nice music, Plexuss : )

I would share my Soundcloud* but most of it is demo quality produced with stock plugins or no plugins :lol:

(*if anyone's really interested you can PM me)
Well thank you very much, Mog!

Post

plexuss wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 2:56 amOne professional audio engineer feels I am "top class" in terms of my use of soundstage, clarity and bandwidth. Whether he's right I don't know...
He's not wrong! :clap: :party:
Music tech enthusiast
DAW, VST & hardware hoarder
My "music": https://soundcloud.com/antic604

Post

here, more or less like Plexuss is saying, the mixing is the sound design is the orchestration is the composition.
it's art, it's not commerce, 'average reaction' doesn't enter into it really. I don't think people really have objective criteria, everyone brings their filter in, and I'm not them. :shrug:

I have sometimes audio-only projects but they're not 'mastering' projects so much, it means that there isn't a single render coming that's quite right (vagaries of MIDI etc), so A and C from one are close enough, and B from another is close enough so cut them together.
I do further _mixing_ like EQ while I'm in there, and some other cosmetic enhancement, but 'mastering' to me means there is a particulary medium to shoot for, & I don't need to particularly

Post

I am not in disagreement with yas on the reasons why we make music / the passion etc :) I just disagreed that the best path to objectivity is listening to your own music on-repeat. I think you lose objectivity that way. However, I get what people like Plexuss are saying... screw external objectivity - it sounds like how YOU wanted it to sound like, so own your decisions and be confident. Yep, I agree with that attitude.

Maybe I shouldn't be too humble and say "my stuff sounds like demos"... our music has had a profound impact on many people - however, I can say (objectively) that Plexuss' music is of a much higher production quality :)

Maybe we should take this away from a thread about channel strips!

I started making drum & bass in the mid 90's on the Amiga 500 (FastTracker2), but I'm still learning the basics :D

Post

well, I don't disagree with anything one says about how they think about it, but this is that whole conventional wisdom received thing, about the need for this or that. And not all music is supposed to sound like all other music. Ms 'average listener' isn't going to want to hear much of me, probably.
I genuinely don't see people as having particularly object-restricted ears or judgements, so someone does 'the highs are too much', it's too much for_them yet it's exactly what I'm going for. "The lead guitar is too loud" = dude, that's just, like, your opinion.
If it's harsh more objectively speaking there would tend to be a technical criterion hence an answer for it, but the word represents a value judgement I may simply not share at all, let alone the possibility 'it *should be* harsh'.

I give my ears a rest, there are times I am just not the person to make mission-critical decisions on a mix. In both directions, there are times when something sounds really bad but the next day is not alarming. My ears were shot, they might well be shot half the time, only I'm not doing snap decisions. I'm not insecure about my mixing. I didn't know anything when I started with the DAW ways.

Post

Here's an example of an older track...

https://soundcloud.com/gangviolins/deep-state

I think it LACKS high end and sparkle. There's also a technical issue with the bass (sub) randomly peaking, among other things that I would "fix".

I'm planning to remix it eventually. But... somehow with these "issues", people still like it. No one says "It's a bit dark and murky sounding" - maybe subconciously the darkness adds to the mystery and vibe of the song.

It was pro-mastered and the Mastering Engineer didn't add top end, so perhaps they thought it was intentional. Which comes back to Plexuss' whole outlook about not needing external validation.

Post

House of Kush just released Blyss, a fat channel strip. I have yet to check it out.


Post

I hear good things about Silika and that AR-1. Kush are pretty damn handy with their algos.

Post

If that is a channel strip, then so is the thing Bones suggested... the thing he got laughed at for bringing it up in this thread, you know? Just saying...

Post

jens wrote: Fri Jul 23, 2021 2:58 am If that is a channel strip, then so is the thing Bones suggested... the thing he got laughed at for bringing it up in this thread, you know? Just saying...
Well it is EQ + Saturation + Compressor. That's a minimal "channel strip". But Kush is selling it as an EQ.

Post

nevermind...

Post

This thread seems to be not really about "Best channel strip plugin that's NOT emulation of SSL, Neve, API, Amek, etc."... but rather about stalking and creeping up to people bringing an original, innovative or cool idea and then jump on top and shit all over it for god knows what reason... That Blyss from Kush (EQ, saturation and compression... though House of Kush sells it simply as an EQ) now is "not" a channel strip... what are we doing here, reading the small print on the webster dictionary?

By the way, so far Blyss sounds awesome. 1 hour playing with it so far and it's very hard to make it sound bad.

But, anyway, "it's not a strip channel", so I'll go back to the newest KingOz thread...
“In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.”

Post

Image

Post Reply

Return to “Effects”