In all honesty, think second groups whole outcome is 20% and out of that 5% is worth keeping and average at best.antic604 wrote: Thu Aug 19, 2021 1:07 pm Let's be honest for a second.
I'd say every famous and revered true musician (of the kind that needs a "boring" DAW to just record what's in their head) has probably 5-10x more material that they ever released. And of what's released not 100% is gold, usually maybe 20% with the remaining 80% being good, average or filler.
So if that's correct, how does that differ from the process of non-real musicians that "try out wav loops with drag and drop and put fragments together and try and error to create something" and use their DAW to help them do that? Out of hours doing the above they'll maybe consider 10-20% worth keeping, out of that maybe 10-20% worth finishing and releasing (whatever that means today). Isn't that the same artistic judgement at work here? Just that the tools are different?
Why do you consider the 2nd group inferior?
Are DAWs Today Just Boring ?
-
- KVRAF
- 2989 posts since 5 Nov, 2014
- KVRAF
- 8577 posts since 29 Sep, 2010 from Maui
That's sort of like the old MS Agent Active-x control, I freaked out a few people with that in my time.whyterabbyt wrote: Thu Aug 19, 2021 12:52 pmsounds like something aimed at very young children.THE INTRANCER wrote: Wed Aug 18, 2021 6:56 pm Imagine a little man running around on a sequencer lane pushing things around and destroying blocks for you, or sent on a mission to build musical creations for you which you can then change yourself. Built-in AI characters you can control and command to do certain jobs. An AI character that you con compete against in creating a piece of dance music, based on algorithmic programming.
Before the whole "huge security risk" thing. You could script it and send it via email. Loads of
fun to be had there.
- addled muppet weed
- 111301 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
doesn't matter, if they're making something, it's better than making nothing.Passing Bye wrote: Thu Aug 19, 2021 1:40 pmIn all honesty, think second groups whole outcome is 20% and out of that 5% is worth keeping and average at best.antic604 wrote: Thu Aug 19, 2021 1:07 pm Let's be honest for a second.
I'd say every famous and revered true musician (of the kind that needs a "boring" DAW to just record what's in their head) has probably 5-10x more material that they ever released. And of what's released not 100% is gold, usually maybe 20% with the remaining 80% being good, average or filler.
So if that's correct, how does that differ from the process of non-real musicians that "try out wav loops with drag and drop and put fragments together and try and error to create something" and use their DAW to help them do that? Out of hours doing the above they'll maybe consider 10-20% worth keeping, out of that maybe 10-20% worth finishing and releasing (whatever that means today). Isn't that the same artistic judgement at work here? Just that the tools are different?
Why do you consider the 2nd group inferior?
and if they're having fun doing it, then it's all worthwhile.
whether anyone else enjoys it is immaterial.
-
- KVRAF
- 2989 posts since 5 Nov, 2014
Sure, agree, but that wasn't in question at all.vurt wrote: Thu Aug 19, 2021 1:56 pm doesn't matter, if they're making something, it's better than making nothing.
and if they're having fun doing it, then it's all worthwhile.
whether anyone else enjoys it is immaterial.
- addled muppet weed
- 111301 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
it was implied.
inferior/superior
inferior/superior
-
- KVRAF
- 2989 posts since 5 Nov, 2014
Guess it's implied that once you don't have fun and stop creating anything, you should consider another hobby that is at least fun. Don't get me wrong, if buying tools and talking about them is fun for some, by all means have your fun, you don't have to create music to have fun, but it's whole another level expecting of your toys to engage you, retail therapy than isn't really helping, some voids can't be filled with material things and you can't expect to buy your happiness. Maybe DAW's and whole this thing will never bring joy and always be boring, move on.
- Beware the Quoth
- 35476 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
lovehoney beg to differ.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- KVRian
- 1075 posts since 26 Nov, 2007
i am waiting for the next idiot to start a stupid topic lol
"two fools dancing on the hands of time... yeah the fool and me"
Knot Hardly Productions
Knot Hardly Productions
- addled muppet weed
- 111301 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
- addled muppet weed
- 111301 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
viewtopic.php?f=4&p=8189608#p8189608MadDogE134 wrote: Thu Aug 19, 2021 3:09 pm i am waiting for the next idiot to start a stupid topic lol
-
- KVRAF
- 2989 posts since 5 Nov, 2014
Hahahaha
Guess there's always going to be someone unsatisfied, even with filled voids.
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
"from the process of non-real musicians"antic604 wrote: Thu Aug 19, 2021 1:07 pm Let's be honest for a second.
I'd say every famous and revered true musician (of the kind that needs a "boring" DAW to just record what's in their head) has probably 5-10x more material that they ever released. And of what's released not 100% is gold, usually maybe 20% with the remaining 80% being good, average or filler.
So if that's correct, how does that differ from the process of non-real musicians that "try out wav loops with drag and drop and put fragments together and try and error to create something" and use their DAW to help them do that? Out of hours doing the above they'll maybe consider 10-20% worth keeping, out of that maybe 10-20% worth finishing and releasing (whatever that means today). Isn't that the same artistic judgement at work here? Just that the tools are different?\
it's a different process. I write parts, the only instrumental things prefabricated here are cymbals and drum rolls and thundersheet loops, which aren't the basis for the composition and are absolutely determined by the timing of what I execute. You do not appear to understand what that even is, having asked me can I not hide the record enable button in Cubase Key Editor.
the result OTOH being that kind of low percentage is a fact, how? argumentum ad culum.
This at this point is not a conversation, that's just posturing with daft strawman bollocks.
My percentage of projects started vs completed is more like 98-99% is worth finishing and of that 100% is finally released. Which sometimes means it took months. Sometimes it's in realtime.
You have no idea what artistic judgment other than yours will be, why go on so.
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
- Beware the Quoth
- 35476 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
are teh painting boring?jancivil wrote: Thu Aug 19, 2021 4:26 pm one wonders if there are people arguing from not being able to paint on a painting forum
i has teh brushes redesigned....

An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."