It would be cool if you could save VST cc maps so you
can make one cc map for an fx/synth once and for all.
When working on a project; adding another eq plug then you don´t want to waste more time making a new cc map.
Or is this already possible ?
cc map
-
- KVRist
- 49 posts since 6 Jun, 2004
Hi jorgen and everybody on this forum
It would be cool if you could save VST cc maps so you
can make one cc map for an fx/synth once and for all.
When working on a project; adding another eq plug then you don´t want to waste more time making a new cc map.
Or is this already possible ?
It would be cool if you could save VST cc maps so you
can make one cc map for an fx/synth once and for all.
When working on a project; adding another eq plug then you don´t want to waste more time making a new cc map.
Or is this already possible ?
-
- KVRAF
- 3364 posts since 16 Feb, 2004 from atop a katamari
yeah i second that. i always thought it was pretty stupid that you couldn't, seeing as CCMAP is accessed from the FILE menu... didn't make sense to me that you couldn't save it...
Kick, punch, it's all in the mind.
-
- KVRian
- 976 posts since 29 Aug, 2001 from Waynesboro, PA
Till CC maps can be saved seperately, you can wrap your VST inside it's own EnergyXT shell with all the CC mappings setup & save that as a EXT file.
When you need to load that VST, load the appropriate VST version of EnergyXT with the EXT file associated with your VST of choice that was CC mapped! You can have multiple EXT files containing various CC mappings for individual VST's this way. Drag-n-drop the EXT file into the VST version of EnergyXT & off you go!
When you need to load that VST, load the appropriate VST version of EnergyXT with the EXT file associated with your VST of choice that was CC mapped! You can have multiple EXT files containing various CC mappings for individual VST's this way. Drag-n-drop the EXT file into the VST version of EnergyXT & off you go!
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 49 posts since 6 Jun, 2004
- piranha XT
yeah sure, thats a solution, and part of making energy XT so great...
... but I would like a more cpu efficient option.
yeah sure, thats a solution, and part of making energy XT so great...
... but I would like a more cpu efficient option.
-
- KVRian
- 1256 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Seattle/Oklahoma
Added overhead for a plugin "wrapped" with XT is most dependant on the number of Audio inputs and outputs you have on it...usually it's only 1-3% if you are using only a single audio out port. And even less if you are only using the MIDI in port and out ports. It's worth the small cpu overhead to me...so I do have my most commonly used plugin combinations "pre-wrapped-n-mapped"
nF
nF
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 49 posts since 6 Jun, 2004
Yeah your right, the cpu usage is low.antiporter wrote:piranha XT wrote:Have you tried it yet???
But I still hope jorgen will implement an cc map save option in the future.
-
- KVRist
- 410 posts since 8 Jan, 2004 from Switzerland
-
- KVRian
- 976 posts since 29 Aug, 2001 from Waynesboro, PA
I totally agree!antiporter wrote:antiporter wrote:Yeah your right, the cpu usage is low.piranha XT wrote:Have you tried it yet???
But I still hope jorgen will implement an cc map save option in the future.