Sub-Standard DAW Releases - Where Do You Cross The Line ?

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

jancivil wrote: Sun Sep 12, 2021 4:08 pm
Scotty wrote: Sun Sep 12, 2021 10:20 amAs of late Steinberg has been releasing buggier updates with inadequate testing. They do a great job of eliminating major bugs and you can do professional work with it. Regardless it is a stunning achievement. They are slipping lately. 11 is still not solid for many people and it cant all be dismissed as user error.
this is so true, really. 11 is not real stable, 11.1 less so, .2 and .3 less so still here.
I have eliminated one user error (leaving the OS to do automatic graphics switching) but still insane crashes.
(One li'l dude at their forum accuses everyone of having problems with their system, hardware faults ad naus. If I had that quality of problem I wouldn't have Resolve and FCPX rendering at superspeed and being 100% reliable, would I.)
Most of which are hit play and boom, there it goes. Which isn't about pushing the number crunching being impatient, it can be I haven't touched anything for a whole minute, spacebar-play and bam.
It's not from plugins in all probability, as I don't use it to host them mostly, and it's a couple of things inserted in audio channels, half of this is theirs (Frequency). I can't just take VE Pro out of the equation, and it's highly doubtful this is causal at all afaic. Instead of testing they do other things with their time.

But crossing over into another DAW, I can't afford it time-wise or justify the money. And there are features I absolutely rely upon which the others don't do or don't do it with the same ease.
I don't think I've ever gotten Cubase to crash on me. I use it as a production DAW. I have gotten Studio One to crash on me... a lot. Just removing plug-ins sometimes would cause a crash. I haven't testsed 5.4 to see if that fixes these issues, as I only use it as a backup on my laptop.

But Cubase? I can't remember the last time that crashed on me, and I'm fairly certain Cubase 11 Pro has literally never crashed or frozen up on me... like, ever.

One thing that needs to be stated, is that DAW crashes are often caused more by things you bring to the table than the DAW itself. Bugs in plug-ins can seem like bugs in the DAW, because different DAWs will react to bugginess differently. This is why Bitwig has a jail for VST plug-ins. It's a newer DAW, and they understand just how much of an issue this is.

I tend to stick to "bigger" names when it comes to plug-ins and virtual instruments (iZotope, Softube, Native Instruments, East West, etc.), [largely] to avoid having to deal with bugginess introduced by plug-ins from smaller developers and/or the internet's chest of freebies (which are generally badly supported - or, at least, often have badly prioritized support strategies).

For example I stopped using all Waves plug-ins because WaveShell was a pretty universal source of problems across multiple DAWs.

I also tend to avoid VST2 whenever possible, hiding/disabling those versions and using VST3 instead (some DAWs will auto-hide [most] VST2 plug-ins when both are installed). For some reason - and this may be anecdotal - but I notice the VST2 plug-ins just seem to be more problematic than VST3 - except in a DAW like Samplitude Pro X, where the VST3 support is hogwash (so you should always default to VST2 in that software).
If I had that quality of problem I wouldn't have Resolve and FCPX rendering at superspeed and being 100% reliable, would I.
This is some of the most ignorant stuff I've ever read. There was a time when enabling SMT on a system would cause problems in MANY DAWs, while it was optimal to leave this enabled for Video Editing Software.

These are two different classes of software - each with their own requirements, as well as with their own Achilles Heels. For example, having a weak GPU will destroy performance in DaVinci Resolve, while Cubase will happily run at full speed off of integrated graphics.

Beyond that, the type of complex routing that people do with DAWs is often not done with NLEs - especially by amateur video editors or content creators. The Computational and Compute power needed by NLEs has more to do with the kind of footage they work with, as well as the type of processing jobs plug-ins in that domain perform.

Editors aren't generally running video editing sessions with hundreds of instances of VST plug-ins form disparate manufacturers loaded, multi-timbral samplers, synths and virtual instruments, etc. However, the Noise Reduction Plug-ins alone use as much CPU (and RAM) as multiple synth VSTis combined...

There simply are more avenues for failure with a DAW. Many YouTubers can get by with using only 1st party effects, or solutions tested and designed to work in concert with their choice of NLE (i.e. Final Cut Pro + Motion + Compressor). Music Producers and other DAW users tend to get solutions from lots of different vendors, and this all complicates the issue.

There is a reason why the Fairlight Page has tended to be one of the buggiest parts of the Resolve application - with some of the hardest to resolve bugs - pun unintended...

If I said you are blocked, I won't see your posts. Please kindly refrain from quoting or replying to me.
"Notifications for Nothing" are annoying. Blocking me in return is a good way to avoid this.


Post

As for the thread's OT, I think it depends on the maturity of the application.

If we're talking about a newer DAW like Bitwig, I have higher expectations for releases because a lot of the features to implement are "catch up" features. When something needed doesn't show up, it's a bit more frustrating.

For DAWs like Cubase or Digital Performer... The maturity is very high, so they tend to already be extremely feature-packed generalist DAWs. The amount of stuff I "need ASAP" left to implement is very low. So, the thinner upgrades are not an issue unless they are priced too high.

Cubase charging $60/99 for Updates/Upgrades is fairly reasonable.
Digital Performer's yearly upgrades are about the most I'd be willing to pay for a product that deep on a yearly upgrade cycle.

But the $249 MAGIX asks for Samplitude Pro X Suite upgrades... well, that's a bit of a NO GO zone for me. The cross grade to Cubase wasn't that expensive, and basically gave me 15 years of future Samplitude development in one purchase, so I went that route.

So, it really depends on the product and its status as it pertains to feature implementation at time of release.

Lastly, you're always free to skip a release so that you can get a higher value for your dollar at a latter release. On one has a gun to your head to force you to buy it.

The priority is getting work done, not spending my life waiting for DAW releases so I can see if and how much I want to complain about them. There were people using 5-10 year old versions of Pro Tools and they didn't even care to look at the change logs, because they didn't need anything more than what they already owned.

If I said you are blocked, I won't see your posts. Please kindly refrain from quoting or replying to me.
"Notifications for Nothing" are annoying. Blocking me in return is a good way to avoid this.


Post

I only upgrade stuff when there is a good SALE . New DAW versions are for guinea pigs .

Post

I have had Samplitude Pro for years but I don't even install it because it's too buggy and crashes a lot. Has anyone tried the new versions? are they stable at all?
Macbook Pro M4, Ableton 12 Suite, NI Komplete

Post

riley4reason wrote: Wed Sep 29, 2021 12:55 pm I have had Samplitude Pro for years but I don't even install it because it's too buggy and crashes a lot. Has anyone tried the new versions? are they stable at all?
No idea, but please vote here if you haven't :)

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=570638
Music tech enthusiast
DAW, VST & hardware hoarder
My "music": https://soundcloud.com/antic604

Post

antic604 wrote: Wed Sep 29, 2021 1:05 pm
riley4reason wrote: Wed Sep 29, 2021 12:55 pm I have had Samplitude Pro for years but I don't even install it because it's too buggy and crashes a lot. Has anyone tried the new versions? are they stable at all?
No idea, but please vote here if you haven't :)

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=570638
I am up-to-date for the Daws I use
Macbook Pro M4, Ableton 12 Suite, NI Komplete

Post

Trensharo wrote: Thu Sep 16, 2021 12:05 am The priority is getting work done, not spending my life waiting for DAW releases so I can see if and how much I want to complain about them. There were people using 5-10 year old versions of Pro Tools and they didn't even care to look at the change logs, because they didn't need anything more than what they already owned.
Agreed. I recently realized why all the studios I visited as a teen were running old shit. Because it worked and they had more important things to do. My studio got a lot more productive when I started only upgrading if the change logs had something essential. It also took a bit of a realignment in prioritizing software that tended to have less essentials in the change logs… Logic, PT, Cubase come to mind.

Post

THE INTRANCER wrote: Thu Sep 09, 2021 5:16 amWhether users should be awarded anything is another thing, but in any case, just what are your limits in an acceptable level of stability and bugs that may hamper your natural flow in doing what you want to achieve ? At what point do you say, I'm getting the f-out of here, what's your limits ?
Easy, my limit is when I lose work and it's not my fault. I'll put up with it happening once but if it starts happening on multiple occasions and product support doesn't help me sort it out, I'll start looking around for something better.
For users of multiple DAWs, it's really not so much of an issue...
... because you are already used to f**king yourselves around moving from one to another that it won't seem like a problem.
It's interesting that DAW developers are really not interested in selling you previous versions of software, they want you to buy a bug ridden block of cheese instead.
That's never been my experience with any of the DAWs I've used. Updates work as well as previous versions in my experience. If I do get problems, it's usually down to something I've done wrong.
Software developers these days also feel the requirement to use data gathering mechanisms to track what is happening with your / their software. Much of that, of which we are probably oblivious to, should we even care, but I always feel when I see it, an unnerving feeling of invasiveness and a like yeah, what do I get for that information you collect...? A better product, possibly...I'd hope.
That's exactly what you get. They get to see how we all use their products so they can improve them. There is nothing else of value in monitoring our usage.
Maybe we should lower our expectations about what we expect from DAWs.
It definitely seems like you should. My expectations are very much aligned to the reality of the situation so I am rarely, if ever, disappointed.
NOVAkILL : Legion GO, AMD Z1x, 16GB RAM, Win11 | Audient EVO 8 | Lumi Keys | Studio Pro 8
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron

Post

antic604 wrote: Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:44 amBecause one DAW doesn't do everything. Even Cubase.
Of course it does. It may not do it the way you want to do it but, in my experience, the compromises inherent in using multiple DAWs far outweigh the minor inconveniences of having to do things the way your DAW of choice is designed to do them.

My bandmate still flits from Orion to Cubase to Studio One (because I give him no choice on that front) but I don't even have Cubase installed on my new laptop and Orion is only there in case I need to export an old song as a MIDI file so I can put it into Studio One. When I started using Studio One, the plan was for it to be just for live work but the massive effort it required to get all our song across into it made it clear that using one DAW for one thing and a different DAW for other things was way more hassle than it was worth. So now it is Studio One for everything as far as I'm concerned, unless/until something even better comes along that I can use for everything I need to do.
Serhii Kot wrote: Sun Sep 12, 2021 12:12 pmFor example:
Live looping
Modulation (for any parameter on a track, not only midi cc)
Complex signal chains on one track
If I'm not mistaken, Live does all those things, doesn't it?
antic604 wrote: Sun Sep 12, 2021 12:14 pmOk, what Cubase misses for me personally are modulation sources (LFOs, MSEGs, Env. Followers, etc.) that you can attach to any other device; and splitters that let you process signal in parallel, by dividing it into left/right, mid/side, low/mid/high on a single track. Sure, there are workarounds, but once you've worked with a DAW that does this properly it's difficult to go back.
Those are reasons not to use Cubase, not a reason to use multiple DAWs.
ramseysounds wrote: Sun Sep 12, 2021 12:22 pmDifferent DAWS for live performance I totally understand.
I don't. What's so different? Do you not need to have a good mix when you play live? As far as I can see, everything you need to mix a piece for a release you also need to play it live.
ramseysounds wrote: Sun Sep 12, 2021 7:09 pmIm not making it a cubase topic. I use it yes, but I’m saying daws in general. I’ve seen people on here say they use about 4 or 5 different daws 🤦‍♂️
You'll find these are people who never actually achieve anything. For us, the process is a means to an end. The end result for us is a finished song we can listen to, release and/or play live for the entertainment/enjoyment of others. For them, the process is the means and the end so the longer and more convoluted that process is, the better. They are complete idiots but they mostly also spend more money than the rest of us, so they are over-catered to.
antic604 wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 9:16 amFor example, I might require an LFO to bring some life into a sequence I programmed... I might have to use Bitwig's velocity randomisation to breath some life into hihat pattern... I might need to spend hours applying complex grooves and randomisation to my bassline...
Those are all things you can do in Cubase. This tends to tell me that your use of multiple DAWs is actually preventing you from learning one of them well enough to allow you to do everything in it.
Trensharo wrote: Wed Sep 15, 2021 11:52 pmI don't think I've ever gotten Cubase to crash on me. I use it as a production DAW. I have gotten Studio One to crash on me... a lot.
My experience is the opposite - I find Studio One to be more stable than Cubase was for me. Not that it was a huge problem with Cubase but it's basically a non-problem with Studio One.
But Cubase? I can't remember the last time that crashed on me, and I'm fairly certain Cubase 11 Pro has literally never crashed or frozen up on me... like, ever.
When you say "ever", how long has v11 been around, a few months?
NOVAkILL : Legion GO, AMD Z1x, 16GB RAM, Win11 | Audient EVO 8 | Lumi Keys | Studio Pro 8
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron

Post

I crossed a line under Reason 12, 13, 14, 15, 16..... to stuck in never never land, (don't like the rack in my current DAW really). Upgrading to Studio One 4, was a push as it was... I don't know what would really make me say wow, I want to upgrade to 6.6. A new GUI would probably do it....
KVR S1-Thread | The Intrancersonic-Design Source > Program Resource | Studio One Resource | Music Gallery | 2D / 3D Sci-fi Art | GUI Projects | Animations | Photography | Film Docs | 80's Cartoons | Games | Music Hardware |

Post

Even if they didn't actually make it better in any other way and the new GUI didn't change the workflow one bit? That's just completely f**king stupid.
NOVAkILL : Legion GO, AMD Z1x, 16GB RAM, Win11 | Audient EVO 8 | Lumi Keys | Studio Pro 8
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron

Post

BONES wrote: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:02 am Even if they didn't actually make it better in any other way and the new GUI didn't change the workflow one bit? That's just completely f**king stupid.
Without the GUI, you wouldn't have any workflow at all. It's all interconnected. New fonts, new zoom functions... new interactive ways to work. I'd expect that after 7-8 years in DAW land.
KVR S1-Thread | The Intrancersonic-Design Source > Program Resource | Studio One Resource | Music Gallery | 2D / 3D Sci-fi Art | GUI Projects | Animations | Photography | Film Docs | 80's Cartoons | Games | Music Hardware |

Post

Hence my question because it would be the simplest thing in the world to change the GUI without changing the workflow. e.g. Change all the colours and swap the positions of the windows - mixer above arrangement window, browser on the left, Inspector on the right. Change the order of the tool buttons and the positions of things like the transport controls and tempo display. Your blanket statement of "a new GUI" doesn't tell anyone anything, it just makes you look like an idiot. And "new fonts, new zoom functions" doesn't do much to help you look any brighter, either, unless you can explain how a different font will make your mixes sound better or allow you to complete them faster. Even zooming is quick and easy, way better than other hosts I've used. I don't see how it needs changing. Perhaps you just need to watch Gregor's zooming tutorial video?
NOVAkILL : Legion GO, AMD Z1x, 16GB RAM, Win11 | Audient EVO 8 | Lumi Keys | Studio Pro 8
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron

Post

For the first time ever I regressed to previous version of a DAW with Reason. I gave the v12 a fair fighting chance, but it was pretty unusable to me in its current state to the point that going back to v11.3.9 felt like an upgrade :D

So there, that's where I drew the line.

I'm confident they'll polish it up and in 3-4 months I'll install the v12 back, but that was the first for me.
Music tech enthusiast
DAW, VST & hardware hoarder
My "music": https://soundcloud.com/antic604

Post

A customer walks into a car showroom and spends some time looking around...

Bones is sitting at his desk typing on some forum...

Customer: "I'd like a new car "...

Bones: "Your blanket statement of "a new car" doesn't tell anyone anything, it just makes you look like an idiot."

Bones: "What do you want specifically? "

Customer: "I'd like four doors and boot."

Bones: "Four doors, and a boot ? What do you want them for ? It's not going to get you from point 'a' to point 'b' any faster, why don't you buy a 25-foot cabin cruiser with a big mercury engine on the back of it. That will get you from point 'a' to point 'b' in a straight line unless you can explain why you want to buy a car with a boot and four doors to get to your destination and miss out on all the fishing you can do by going by boat. Even jumping out of the boat is quicker than having to release the seatbelt and then open the door, in shark infested waters. Perhaps you need training in how not to be eaten by hungry sharks by watching Gregor's tutorials."

Customer: "No, thanks, I just need a car with four doors and a boot."

Bones: "I don't sell cars ", I just sit here and tell people that they are stupid and are idiots and insult people's intelligence because I'm always right and nobody else matters but me and me alone...cough and my bandmates. Who cares what everybody else wants... "

--------
KVR S1-Thread | The Intrancersonic-Design Source > Program Resource | Studio One Resource | Music Gallery | 2D / 3D Sci-fi Art | GUI Projects | Animations | Photography | Film Docs | 80's Cartoons | Games | Music Hardware |

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”