I personally think so. It actually looks more confusing when you first see it than it actually is. The truth is, it’s just not a very deep synth. Once you’ve spent an hour or so making a patch from scratch, you’ll get the hang of it and then it’s pretty easy. I do agree that they should have just folded the filter and oscillator models into Largo and make it a sort of combo synth.briefcasemanx wrote: Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:12 pm I also bought PPG Wave and I haven't used that in a project either. Maybe because the interface just looks awful AND is tiny, so I don't want to spend the time to actually learn it. Is that one good once you actually learn how to use it?
Opinions re. Sound of Waldorf Largo
- KVRAF
- 18511 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
- KVRAF
- 18511 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
Oh, it tasted better, but not like the hamburger which I love.Gadget Fiend wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 4:56 pmHmm, you'd think the fried sandwich would taste better. As a chef friend of mine used to say "fat is taste." Blofeld/Largo are lacking the fat.zerocrossing wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 3:03 pm I went into my favorite burger place and tried out the fried chicken sandwich and it was terrible! It totally lacked the delicious, beefy taste and it was fried instead of grilled! NOT RECOMMENDED.
In my also owning a bunch of hardware informed opinion, Largo sounds great, but I also never expected it to sound like a Microwave 1, or really much like any Waldorf that had come before. Considering that you already have a Microwave 1, I’d think that you’d appreciate having a wavetable synth with a different character. Get that big fatty Microwave 1 burger going and cut that fat with a bit of onion/pickle/mustard/ketchup. Plopping extra cheese, mayonnaise, etc on the burger just ends up too rich. Gotta hit it with some salt/acid.
I personally don’t care what you do or what you like, but this is something I see quite often. Someone sits down with an instrument and due to a failure of imagination, judges it without context. Would I want Largo to be my only wavetable synth? Nope, but I am always thinking of a bigger picture. Salt/Sweet/Fat/Acid/Base/Bitter. Not every synth does everything well. I think Largo definitely adds something to the menu. I also don’t load it up in a project and complain that it doesn’t sound like my Modal 002.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 410 posts since 5 Feb, 2012
To use your analogy, Largo is almost all salt and bitter. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth.zerocrossing wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 9:00 pm I personally don’t care what you do or what you like, but this is something I see quite often. Someone sits down with an instrument and due to a failure of imagination, judges it without context. Would I want Largo to be my only wavetable synth? Nope, but I am always thinking of a bigger picture. Salt/Sweet/Fat/Acid/Base/Bitter. Not every synth does everything well. I think Largo definitely adds something to the menu. I also don’t load it up in a project and complain that it doesn’t sound like my Modal 002.
And for the record, I am looking for another MicroWave I, but in software so I can run multiple instances of it for additional polyphony. The hardware MicroWave is only 8 voices and the multimode references the same pool of patches for each separate multi. So that's not very useful at extending the MicroWave. So I run the MicroWave in single mode.
I was hoping I could find an inexpensive software instrument that would get me 80% of the way to a MicroWave I (or hell, even a MicroWave II). But Largo isn't that synth (and neither is Nave or PPG 3.V). So I will probably get another MicroWave I or possibly an M if I can find room for it.
Last edited by Gadget Fiend on Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Matrix-1000, MicroWave with Access programmer, MicroWave II, MKS-50 with MidiClub programmer, MKS-70, MKS-80 with Kiwi Patch Editor, Nord 2 Rack, Nord 3 Rack, Prophet REV2 module, Pulse 2, Shruthi, Virus TI
- KVRAF
- 12258 posts since 7 Sep, 2006 from Roseville, CA
Funnily enough, this thread made me fire up Largo again for the first time in a while and I've gotta say, I actually liked the sound way more than I previously did. I'm generally not a fan of wavetable synths, but I found myself noodling around and getting some really nice sounds out of it. On the flip side, I used to like the interface, but now I find myself thinking that it could use some serious refinements to make it more modern and easier on my aging eyes.
Logic Pro | LUNA Pro | OB-X8 | Prophet 6 | OB-6 | Rev2 | TEO-5 | Pro 3 | SE-1X | Minitaur | Deepmind 12D | Slim Phatty | TR-1000 | Analog RYTM mk2 | Digitakt 2 | TD-3 MO | TD-3 | Maschine+
- Banned
- 887 posts since 3 Jul, 2016
.. no need for nord wave 2 having korg wavestate ...
MPG X670E CARBON Ryzen 9 7900, 64Gb 6K DDR5 4x2tb Nvmes
- KVRAF
- 5117 posts since 5 May, 2005 from Stockholm, Sweden
I was browsing through the sample content on the PPG Wave V3 and came across a sound I recognized from an Enigma track called "Knocking on forbidden doors" on their first album way back in 1990. I was surprised to find out it's a recording of a Formula One car whizzing past in some Grand Prix, (T770 EF CARS grand prix DB-LL), I would have never guessed that, it was used to very good effect in the song and very prominent in the mix. Was a nice surprise to come across a bit of music history like that.zerocrossing wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:42 pmI personally think so. It actually looks more confusing when you first see it than it actually is. The truth is, it’s just not a very deep synth. Once you’ve spent an hour or so making a patch from scratch, you’ll get the hang of it and then it’s pretty easy. I do agree that they should have just folded the filter and oscillator models into Largo and make it a sort of combo synth.briefcasemanx wrote: Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:12 pm I also bought PPG Wave and I haven't used that in a project either. Maybe because the interface just looks awful AND is tiny, so I don't want to spend the time to actually learn it. Is that one good once you actually learn how to use it?
- KVRAF
- 18511 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
It seems to me like you are listening to what Largo isn’t (a Microwave 1 or 2) and not listening to it for what it is (not a Microwave 1 or 2). Since that’s probably the only thing that will make you happy, I’d say you’re on the right track getting one as there really isn’t a software emulation.Gadget Fiend wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:26 pmTo use your analogy, Largo is almost all salt and bitter. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth.zerocrossing wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 9:00 pm I personally don’t care what you do or what you like, but this is something I see quite often. Someone sits down with an instrument and due to a failure of imagination, judges it without context. Would I want Largo to be my only wavetable synth? Nope, but I am always thinking of a bigger picture. Salt/Sweet/Fat/Acid/Base/Bitter. Not every synth does everything well. I think Largo definitely adds something to the menu. I also don’t load it up in a project and complain that it doesn’t sound like my Modal 002.
And for the record, I am looking for another MicroWave I, but in software so I can run multiple instances of it for additional polyphony. The hardware MicroWave is only 8 voices and the multimode references the same pool of patches for each separate multi. So that's not very useful at extending the MicroWave. So I run the MicroWave in single mode.
I was hoping I could find an inexpensive software instrument that would get me 80% of the way to a MicroWave I (or hell, even a MicroWave II). But Largo isn't that synth (and neither is Nave or PPG 3.V). So I will probably get another MicroWave I or possibly an M if I can find room for it.
One thing that I have had good (but not really Microwave emulation) results is with bringing PPG wavetables into various other synths. Icarus is a good one because you can also bit reduce pre filter and there’s a few decent analog filter emulations including a 24 db ladder, 303 and CEM. I’ve looked for Microwave wavetables but I can’t really seem to find them. I did find Largo’s though, not sure what the overlap is. I’m also going to get an M because I really think its got a great sound, but I’ll still boot Largo up from time to time. I think it’s got an interesting quirky tone. Not really “fat” in any way, but when I have something like my Prophet 6 playing a big pad and some crunchy guitars going on, it does nicely cut though. You know, like a dash of bitters in your drink. Not a shot of them, just a dash. Balance.
What I really wish is that my 002 did wave scanning. I prefer it to any Waldorf. I can wave sequence, but not interpolation.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 410 posts since 5 Feb, 2012
Have you ever checked out the wavescanning in Omnisphere? (I think they added it in version 2.5 But I could be wrong.) I wonder how musical Omni's wavescanning sounds?zerocrossing wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 4:34 am What I really wish is that my 002 did wave scanning. I prefer it to any Waldorf. I can wave sequence, but not interpolation.
Matrix-1000, MicroWave with Access programmer, MicroWave II, MKS-50 with MidiClub programmer, MKS-70, MKS-80 with Kiwi Patch Editor, Nord 2 Rack, Nord 3 Rack, Prophet REV2 module, Pulse 2, Shruthi, Virus TI
-
hurricaneaudiolab hurricaneaudiolab https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=424432
- KVRist
- 454 posts since 15 Aug, 2018
-
jacqueslacouth jacqueslacouth https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=48379
- KVRian
- 1149 posts since 18 Nov, 2004
A pint of lager and a packet of crisps leave a bad taste in your mouth???? WeirdGadget Fiend wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:26 pm
To use your analogy, Largo is almost all salt and bitter. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
-
- KVRAF
- 35715 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Yeah, unless you can settle for "close enough". Considering Largo and Nave have all of the Microwave's wavetables, and Largo even has an option to set the resolution of the wavetables, so that it creates similar harmonics with lower resolution, I think you can safely say that it's as close as you can get with software.zerocrossing wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 4:34 amIt seems to me like you are listening to what Largo isn’t (a Microwave 1 or 2) and not listening to it for what it is (not a Microwave 1 or 2). Since that’s probably the only thing that will make you happy, I’d say you’re on the right track getting one as there really isn’t a software emulation.Gadget Fiend wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:26 pmTo use your analogy, Largo is almost all salt and bitter. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth.zerocrossing wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 9:00 pm I personally don’t care what you do or what you like, but this is something I see quite often. Someone sits down with an instrument and due to a failure of imagination, judges it without context. Would I want Largo to be my only wavetable synth? Nope, but I am always thinking of a bigger picture. Salt/Sweet/Fat/Acid/Base/Bitter. Not every synth does everything well. I think Largo definitely adds something to the menu. I also don’t load it up in a project and complain that it doesn’t sound like my Modal 002.
And for the record, I am looking for another MicroWave I, but in software so I can run multiple instances of it for additional polyphony. The hardware MicroWave is only 8 voices and the multimode references the same pool of patches for each separate multi. So that's not very useful at extending the MicroWave. So I run the MicroWave in single mode.
I was hoping I could find an inexpensive software instrument that would get me 80% of the way to a MicroWave I (or hell, even a MicroWave II). But Largo isn't that synth (and neither is Nave or PPG 3.V). So I will probably get another MicroWave I or possibly an M if I can find room for it.
Or... you just get the new Waldorf M synth. And, if that still isn't close enough for you, a use Microwave. Ridiculous prices though. A few years ago, you could get a Microwave or a microQ for 200 to 250 €. Now the prices are completely nuts, like everywhere.
-
- KVRAF
- 35715 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Wonderful.hurricaneaudiolab wrote: Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:56 pm I think Largo sounds FANTASTIC. Reminds me of Albino, sorta:
-
hurricaneaudiolab hurricaneaudiolab https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=424432
- KVRist
- 454 posts since 15 Aug, 2018
Definitely.
The factory presets and small GUI aren't doing this synth any favors. I thought I read somewhere that Waldorf are working on a bigger GUI for it though.
-
- KVRAF
- 35715 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I'd be really happy if they still work on Largo. It's been a while since the last update (think 3 years or something).
Well, never say never. I wouldn't have thought that they'd do a new GUI for the Waldorf Edition either.
Well, never say never. I wouldn't have thought that they'd do a new GUI for the Waldorf Edition either.
-
- KVRian
- 1451 posts since 1 Jun, 2008
Waldorf often abandons older products, unfortunately. I love my Pulse 2 but it was an unfinished product and they just stopped updating it. It still has an empty slot for "future effects" and the giant LCD is mostly used for showing the program number, which is quite useless.
