The ultimate vst sequencer plugin?
- KVRian
- 1353 posts since 31 Aug, 2007 from wales
- addled muppet weed
- 111238 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
-
- Banned
- 1779 posts since 26 Aug, 2012
I'd be nice to be young and know everything again.mholloway wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 6:38 am+ most don't have the facility to use note-repeats / ratchets, or step-input recording modes...there, Kinh, that's now 6 features of a step sequencer that a Piano Roll lacks, and we're just getting started.WatchTheGuitar wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 2:57 pmA number of DAW piano rolls don’t have facility to use note probabilities, change direction, quantise to a scale etc.Kinh wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 1:42 pm There ain't that many on the market cause they're redundant. What additional feature does a sequencer have over a piano roll?
I would think a piano roll has more features.
It's always the folks who have no experience with / no actual idea of what step sequencers are who like to make posts assserting that Piano Rolls are exactly the same or better than them.
Logic Pro and Studio One both added comprehensive step-sequencer functionally within the last few years, and guess what, it's not because their devs though it'd be cool to add totally "redundant" tools that offered nothing beyond their existing Piano Rolls...
Try one. They are loads of fun and encourage compositional approaches that are totally different than standard MIDI recording / editing, particularly when used in step-input record mode.
I can easily wipe the floor with you right now but I'll just say you are wrong, wrong and...wrong.
"They are loads of fun" sums it up. THAT'S the only reason people like you use them, be honest. A piano roll can do loads more, the modulation capabilities alone destroys any sequencer vst out there and any 'functions' a sequencer has can be easily replicated through automating plugins but many functions piano roll has CAN'T be replicated in a sequencer. So you don't really know what you're talking about or maybe haven't had much experience with MIDI, fair enough.
-
- KVRAF
- 2427 posts since 11 Jan, 2009 from Portland, OR, USA
Dude, seriously... what is wrong with you?Kinh wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:29 am I can easily wipe the floor with you right now but I'll just say you are wrong, wrong and...wrong.
"They are loads of fun" sums it up. THAT'S the only reason people like you use them, be honest. A piano roll can do loads more, the modulation capabilities alone destroys any sequencer vst out there and any 'functions' a sequencer has can be easily replicated through automating plugins but many functions piano roll has CAN'T be replicated in a sequencer. So you don't really know what you're talking about or maybe haven't had much experience with MIDI, fair enough.
This forum has become an absolutely toxic swamp.
-
- Banned
- 1779 posts since 26 Aug, 2012
But it's OK for them to say:mholloway wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:14 amDude, seriously... what is wrong with you?Kinh wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:29 am I can easily wipe the floor with you right now but I'll just say you are wrong, wrong and...wrong.
"They are loads of fun" sums it up. THAT'S the only reason people like you use them, be honest. A piano roll can do loads more, the modulation capabilities alone destroys any sequencer vst out there and any 'functions' a sequencer has can be easily replicated through automating plugins but many functions piano roll has CAN'T be replicated in a sequencer. So you don't really know what you're talking about or maybe haven't had much experience with MIDI, fair enough.
This forum has become an absolutely toxic swamp.
"It's always the folks who have no experience with / no actual idea of what step sequencers are who like to make posts assserting that Piano Rolls are exactly the same or better than them.
Bit if a double standard don't ya think!
I have more experience with sequencers and piano Rolls than most people here. If someone says opposite I let them know, I'm sure you're the same.I think ignorance if far more toxic.
- addled muppet weed
- 111238 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
hmmmm.Kinh wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:19 am I have more experience with sequencers and piano Rolls than most people here.
- KVRAF
- 2402 posts since 3 Mar, 2010
A piano roll for me is like looking at a blank sheet of paper when I want to write something. If I have an idea of what I want to write, that's great, but sometimes (most times) I don't have a lot of time and (yes) just want to have fun playing around with different sounds while the notes are initially chosen by a step sequencer. Adjusting the different parameters in the step sequencer, such as gate, scale, probability, etc. gives me some inspiration and allows me to think of ideas that I would not have necessarily thought of on my own - and certainly not in the amount of time I usually have to play with this stuff.
I think Euclidean sequencing would be particularly difficult to implement in a piano roll. Similarly, clock divisions are another feature that many step sequencers (such as the HY sequencers, and Dave Dove's) have that I find particularly inspirational, but that would be very difficult if not impossible to replicate in most DAW piano rolls. These sequencers create multiple tracks/send notes on multiple MIDI channels at different divisions of the master clock, all within a single VST or M4L device. I have searched for a while to find a simple VST that does clock division, which would be necessary to allow different tracks of a DAW (using the piano roll in each) to proceed at different tempos, but haven't found any.
I think Euclidean sequencing would be particularly difficult to implement in a piano roll. Similarly, clock divisions are another feature that many step sequencers (such as the HY sequencers, and Dave Dove's) have that I find particularly inspirational, but that would be very difficult if not impossible to replicate in most DAW piano rolls. These sequencers create multiple tracks/send notes on multiple MIDI channels at different divisions of the master clock, all within a single VST or M4L device. I have searched for a while to find a simple VST that does clock division, which would be necessary to allow different tracks of a DAW (using the piano roll in each) to proceed at different tempos, but haven't found any.
-
WatchTheGuitar WatchTheGuitar https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=440193
- KVRAF
- 13256 posts since 30 Apr, 2019
Closest thing I have to that is the TimeShaper tool in the Cableguys ShaperBox.bharris22 wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:12 pm I have searched for a while to find a simple VST that does clock division, which would be necessary to allow different tracks of a DAW (using the piano roll in each) to proceed at different tempos, but haven't found any.
-
gaggle of hermits gaggle of hermits https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=521655
- KVRian
- 965 posts since 18 Jul, 2021
well that's interesting, can you describe how to ratchet arbitrary notes based on a midi input signal as the track plays? (btw, the plugin I'm thinking of targeting doesn't have MSEGs)Kinh wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:29 am A piano roll can do loads more, the modulation capabilities alone destroys any sequencer vst out there and any 'functions' a sequencer has can be easily replicated through automating plugins
or transpose individual note positions from an external controller? you can sort of do this with the logical editor in cubase or the equivalent in logic but it's not a real-time process. but as you're so experienced...
by the way, if it helps I can translate. "howju ratchet that shiz up if da room is pumpin'?"
-
WatchTheGuitar WatchTheGuitar https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=440193
- KVRAF
- 13256 posts since 30 Apr, 2019
well you just need to know exactly what to play (arbitrary is disallowed) and physically play it apparently even if it requires growing extra hands otherwise you are not 4Real
-
gaggle of hermits gaggle of hermits https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=521655
- KVRian
- 965 posts since 18 Jul, 2021
shh, no-one tell ludwig göransson: he's been doin' it 'rong.WatchTheGuitar wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 4:33 pm well you just need to know exactly what to play (arbitrary is disallowed) and physically play it apparently even if it requires growing extra hands otherwise you are not 4Real
- addled muppet weed
- 111238 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
i find it weird that people you'd expect to be "creative" are so shortsighted, they think everyone should work the same way they do!!!WatchTheGuitar wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 4:33 pm well you just need to know exactly what to play (arbitrary is disallowed) and physically play it apparently even if it requires growing extra hands otherwise you are not 4Real
the funny bit though was "real musicians play it in then edit the midi..."
can't remember the last time i used "midi" if im honest
-
- Banned
- 2524 posts since 4 Jul, 2019
I also find the complete absence of any knowledge of the history of music over the last 100 years or so a tremendous help in understanding what real music and real musicians are.vurt wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:35 pmi find it weird that people you'd expect to be "creative" are so shortsighted, they think everyone should work the same way they do!!!WatchTheGuitar wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 4:33 pm well you just need to know exactly what to play (arbitrary is disallowed) and physically play it apparently even if it requires growing extra hands otherwise you are not 4Real
the funny bit though was "real musicians play it in then edit the midi..."![]()
can't remember the last time i used "midi" if im honestguess i wasn't making music...
"What you dont know only makes you stronger"
- addled muppet weed
- 111238 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass

