Apple announce new 14" & 16" MBP with M1Pro and M1Max

Configure and optimize you computer for Audio.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

teilo wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 1:38 amThe M1 Max machines have double the memory bandwidth, but that won't matter at all for music production. That comes into play more for things like 8K video production.
Memory bandwidth directly effects any CPU processes which are bandwidth limited. That is why higher speed RAM leads to bigger scores on the performance tests.

If you are running lots of plugins - convolution and algorithmic reverbs etc - unless the whole workspace the plugin is using is in the L2/L3 caches then data is running up and down to main memory. In many situations, most of the CPU cycles for each core in fast modern CPUs are spent waiting for data - the CPU is spinning its wheels. The lower latencies of the caches are aimed at minimising this wastage as far as possible but anything that involves cache misses brings the much larger latency to main memory into play. A big DAW mix, with lots of tracks, with effects, samplers, synths all working at once - is keeping hundreds of tasks running in parallel and keeping all their outputs synchronised and doing this will inevitably involve swapping lots of stuff in and out of main memory.

Post

egbert wrote: Mon Nov 22, 2021 3:20 am
teilo wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 1:38 amThe M1 Max machines have double the memory bandwidth, but that won't matter at all for music production. That comes into play more for things like 8K video production.
Memory bandwidth directly effects any CPU processes which are bandwidth limited. That is why higher speed RAM leads to bigger scores on the performance tests.

If you are running lots of plugins - convolution and algorithmic reverbs etc - unless the whole workspace the plugin is using is in the L2/L3 caches then data is running up and down to main memory. In many situations, most of the CPU cycles for each core in fast modern CPUs are spent waiting for data - the CPU is spinning its wheels. The lower latencies of the caches are aimed at minimising this wastage as far as possible but anything that involves cache misses brings the much larger latency to main memory into play. A big DAW mix, with lots of tracks, with effects, samplers, synths all working at once - is keeping hundreds of tasks running in parallel and keeping all their outputs synchronised and doing this will inevitably involve swapping lots of stuff in and out of main memory.
This is theoretical, and highly dependent on the circumstances. The benefits of higher-speed RAM do not scale linearly along with additional memory bus bandwidth.

The M1 Pro already has 2.8X the bandwidth of the M1. Real world testing has found little to no benefit for the additional doubling of the Max. Even complex music projects only need to reach realtime for the tracks being played, and once they do, no additional data is being moved, and no additional CPU cycles are being consumed.

Then there is this: All demonstrations of what it takes to max out even the M1 Pro on a music project are contrived. It would almost never happen in the real world, and I would venture to say, that it will never happen to 99.9% of music producers with an M1 Pro, and even if it does, the Max isn't going to help. In every demonstration I have seen, the CPU maxes out before the memory bandwidth does.

For music production, the only real justification for the Max is if one needs 64GB of RAM.
Last edited by teilo on Mon Nov 22, 2021 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

I’m just wondering if the 14” can really handle the Max, or if the 16” is really better for that.
As I mentioned, I do not only audio, but also (application) programming and compiling.
If I want to record via mic and the 14”’s fan are making noise, that’s a problem.

Has anyone compared the 14” and 16” in terms of relative weight? Is the ~1.3 pounds that much of a difference?

Post

synchronizer wrote: Mon Nov 22, 2021 4:07 pm I’m just wondering if the 14” can really handle the Max, or if the 16” is really better for that.
As I mentioned, I do not only audio, but also (application) programming and compiling.
Yes, it can handle it just fine. The only advantage of the 16" is high power mode. But that only benefits GPU-intensive operations. Even at that, in real world testing, it's not showing much of an advantage. For example, crypto-mining tests, so far, have shown no benefit. Programming and compiling won't show it at all. You will not experience shorter compiles on the 16". In fact, for programming tasks, a Max will be no faster than a Pro. Your bottleneck is SSD IOPS.

Post

Well the applications I make use the GPU.

So it’s really about the fan, which I did hear comes on sooner for a 14”, and also how often I’ll travel/how much I’ll want to use the larger screen.

I do think the 14” is too small a screen standalone.

Post

@ teilo
I take your point that to some extent the architecture issues become more theoretical than practical for most. We are pretty spoiled these days with how much power and memory we have. In a sense, almost any modern computer system which doesn't have DPC latency issues is good enough for everyday DAW tasks.

My first DAW running Logic Audio PC had a Pentium 133 with 32 MB of RAM in it. I spurged on 2x 2.5 GB drives and then a third 3.2 GB drive for streaming audio which alone cost over 500 bucks in my local currency. If we keep working with 44.1 kHz audio @ 24 bits depth then we have all the power in the world on modern systems as far as streaming audio goes. It is the better quality settings on synths and plugins that chew the CPU cycles and big sample sets that stretch memory resources. Ramping up sampling rates consumes more resources of course.

Post

Well let's put it this way. If money were no object, which one would you want and why? Is there value in either one?

My goal is to be able to set the sample buffer to absolute minimum so I can play my vst instruments in as close to real-time as possible with almost no latency.
So I am also maximizing RAM and getting 2TB of storage.

If the 14" fan is going to make noise, that makes this pointless.

Post

You know more or less how both 14" and 16" models work. You know what you want to do with the machine. Do you really need someone to choose for you which one to get?

Post

synchronizer wrote: Mon Nov 22, 2021 8:00 pm Well let's put it this way. If money were no object, which one would you want and why? Is there value in either one?

My goal is to be able to set the sample buffer to absolute minimum so I can play my vst instruments in as close to real-time as possible with almost no latency.
So I am also maximizing RAM and getting 2TB of storage.

If the 14" fan is going to make noise, that makes this pointless.
:dog:

Dude, I get that the tyranny of choice is a thing, but you are obsessing over details that are irrelevant. For music, there is no difference between the 14" and the 16". None whatsoever. No fan noise difference. No RAM difference. No speed difference. If you are looking for justification: If you want a 16" screen and a bigger battery, then get the 16". Otherwise, don't. This isn't as hard as you are making it.

Post

Well, turns out that one does not simply walk into a store and buy one of these things. I might get mine in January :shrug:

The display is excellent, and the 16" is perfect compromise of usability and portability.

Post

I decided, but yes, it will be a while before it arrives.

Also, Cubase won’t run natively until v12, and who knows when NI Kontakt will.

I was considering trying Digital Performer 11, which is native, but I found it too overwhelming.

Post

Does anyone know if plugins that work on m1 processors natively will also work on m1 pro processors?
Question is, should I jump in and buy the new mbp and assume that all my plugins would work natively or should I just wait a few months.

Post

Moosy_Moose wrote: Sat Nov 27, 2021 5:09 pm Does anyone know if plugins that work on m1 processors natively will also work on m1 pro processors?
They are basically the same architecture just more of everything. So yes
void main(dumb)

Post

Wonder what the iMacs with these processors will cost. I have no use for a laptop, otherwise I would've had the M1 Air already. And the M1 using native ARM plugins is enough for most home recordists.
“Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that."
-Martin Luther King Jr.

Post

Bombadil wrote: Sat Nov 27, 2021 5:45 pm Wonder what the iMacs with these processors will cost. I have no use for a laptop, otherwise I would've had the M1 Air already. And the M1 using native ARM plugins is enough for most home recordists.
The M1 iMacs are already out. Unless you're holding out for the M1 Pro or Max.

https://www.apple.com/imac-24/

Post Reply

Return to “Computer Setup and System Configuration”