KVR Audio

Spe3D · Post by **Spe3D** » Tue Nov 30, 2004 2:36 pm

Ben [KVR] wrote:This thread either gets back to Reason, or it'll be closed

Close it - it's dead

Best regards,

Spe3d

:O)

Whoomph · Post by **Whoomph** » Tue Nov 30, 2004 2:37 pm

Kriminal wrote:
Ben [KVR] wrote:This thread either gets back to Reason, or it'll be closed
Er ok, Reason....

Can you load VST's yet? Is it still on special offer in Toys'r'Us ?

Didn't you know it's what philosophers use to explain everything and you know what Philosophers can be like ,
especially when you end up in the que behind them at Toys r Us .

--

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Tue Nov 30, 2004 2:39 pm

Warmonger wrote:Most of the feature suggestions compiled by users are rather broad and useless, or don't fit into the Reason way of doing things. I've looked at the lists, and there are very few that have really specific features like the ones I listed. My goal was to save the Props the trouble of comprehensive requirements analysis, and get to the construction phase as quickly as possible.

Besides, I *am* a regular on that site.

I'm sure they value your input highly. You obviously do.

Meffy · Post by **Meffy** » Tue Nov 30, 2004 2:41 pm

Good list, Warmonger.

Warmonger · Post by **Warmonger** » Tue Nov 30, 2004 2:52 pm

nuffink wrote:I'm sure they value your input highly. You obviously do.

Nah, I'm not deluding myself here. I know that a lot of those are very specific requests that would take an inordinate amount of development time for little perceived gain for a few users. And I also know that the real reason the feature suggestions forum exists is to filter out the crap from the other boards. But I did need to find some way to procrastinate on my CSci homework.

xg2 · Post by **xg2** » Tue Nov 30, 2004 2:57 pm

TonyVanDam wrote:
Ben [KVR] wrote:
xg2 wrote:
FunkyBunch wrote:but on the other side its better to control all parameters from one prog.
Exactly. Just don't let the Reason lovers hear you say this.

"Why can't you leave Reason alone? Why can't you stop pointing out its obvious deficiencies?"
Why can't you stop your witchhunt(s)? We all know your opinions on Reason, Trackers, magazines, etc. but still you repeat each one at every opportunity and it is tedious

So, why don't you let everyone else discuss what they want to discuss without interrupting with your constant diatribe against the chosen subject matter.

It would be very much appreciated by many around here
Everyone has a lot of fun calling out the negatives of FLS. So why not call out the negatives of Reason?

It's just studio gear!!!

No it's not, for some, it's obviously a religion.

Ben - you should be more unbiased in your moderation. Have I sworn at anybody? Go back and read through the thread. See the sorts of offensive (clearly offensive because they consist of name calling, using swear words) responses I've received.

I criticise Reason because of the reasons I've clearly stated. I didn't just say "I hate Reason" over and over again, did I? I stated WHY I think it's not as great as it's constantly made out to be.
Isn't that allowed here any more? Are only positive opinions allowed from now on? Or is that honour reserved only for Reason?

Spe3D · Post by **Spe3D** » Tue Nov 30, 2004 2:59 pm

xg2 wrote:Or is that honour reserved only for Reason?

only for you - oh! and mags

Best regards,

Spe3d

:O)

Meffy · Post by **Meffy** » Tue Nov 30, 2004 3:01 pm

xg2 wrote:Or is that honour reserved only for Reason?

Meffy
stick a fork in it, I think it's done

It's time for REASON 3 beta testing ...