How do You™ Get By?
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2093 posts since 19 Jun, 2003 from UTM 18 317254E 4295335N (WGS84/NAD83)
Thanks for the feedback, you all... When I have a chance I will remix this with all your comments in mind. 
@ toine6: I'm surprised you can hear anything after a Skinny Puppy concert! I really must have over-compressed this!
[edit:
oops!]
@ toine6: I'm surprised you can hear anything after a Skinny Puppy concert! I really must have over-compressed this!
[edit:
Last edited by You™ on Thu Nov 25, 2004 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2093 posts since 19 Jun, 2003 from UTM 18 317254E 4295335N (WGS84/NAD83)
That's good enough for me!astanine wrote:nothing constructive to say, just i like it
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
I'm not entirely convinced that the vocals are too 'quiet', but more that they're sharing too many frequencies with other instruments. They need their own space, with a different EQ curve and perhaps a reverb or delay that allows high pass.
Great tune, though! I DO like the acoustic-ish drum sound, and I think the blending of the two was successfully done.
Cheers!
Greg
Great tune, though! I DO like the acoustic-ish drum sound, and I think the blending of the two was successfully done.
Cheers!
Greg
- KVRian
- 1313 posts since 29 Mar, 2002 from Salt Lake City, Utah - U.S.A.
Ear plugs baby.@ toine6: I'm surprised you can hear anything after a Skinny Puppy concert! I really must have over-compressed this!
-
- KVRAF
- 7672 posts since 9 Nov, 2003 from Netherlands
For some reason it took a few days of listening to reply. Either a nasty noise in my system or not having the right ears prevented me before.
Anyhow; I quite enjoyed this track George for one.
What I think the stronghold of this track is the playfull percussive sounds. Yet I also feel that it is snowed under by the heavy instrumented track. Especially round 3 mins I feel there is just too much going on making the listen just too dense.
A suggestion would be to just cut some of the tracks and see how that works.
What I do need to say is that I love the vocals; especially the chorus seems to be stuck in my head now.
Anyhow; I quite enjoyed this track George for one.
What I think the stronghold of this track is the playfull percussive sounds. Yet I also feel that it is snowed under by the heavy instrumented track. Especially round 3 mins I feel there is just too much going on making the listen just too dense.
A suggestion would be to just cut some of the tracks and see how that works.
What I do need to say is that I love the vocals; especially the chorus seems to be stuck in my head now.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2093 posts since 19 Jun, 2003 from UTM 18 317254E 4295335N (WGS84/NAD83)
Thanks for those ideas and comments Lunch Money, toine6 and Mystahr...
I'm finally back from NYC (man, there's a lot of crowds there) and will give it another go when I have time. I usually EQ out the bottom end of my voice but this time I didn't for some reason - I'll check that and I have some ideas about thinning the mix too. I just listenend to Plunge's incredible track and am feeling unworthy...
I'm finally back from NYC (man, there's a lot of crowds there) and will give it another go when I have time. I usually EQ out the bottom end of my voice but this time I didn't for some reason - I'll check that and I have some ideas about thinning the mix too. I just listenend to Plunge's incredible track and am feeling unworthy...
-
- KVRer
- 26 posts since 1 Dec, 2004
I like this track pretty well. I actually -like- the heavy layered instrumentation on it. I think you've got the head-bob factor going on there too!
I like the vocals(although it's barely worth repeating, after everybody else saying it).
I think the percussion was blended excellently, and I liked the sorta bassy sound from them.
I like the vocals(although it's barely worth repeating, after everybody else saying it).
I think the percussion was blended excellently, and I liked the sorta bassy sound from them.
Smile! Be happy!
Or we'll -really- give you something to be happy about.
Or we'll -really- give you something to be happy about.
- addled muppet weed
- 111300 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2093 posts since 19 Jun, 2003 from UTM 18 317254E 4295335N (WGS84/NAD83)
-
- KVRist
- 114 posts since 26 Oct, 2004
I liked this alot, give me some flashbacks towards the first half of the 90´. Something about those drums... hmmm.. sounds just a backside of an depeche mode LP... policy of truth i think...
I have some troubles with the cheesy magic box sounds... but I love the sublime reverse effects.
As an ambient musician I think this would be really rad, if it was remixed in half the tempo, in dub style
Lyrics, well.. hmmm, im more into "speak&spell" but it sounds nice and rimes, so its good
/ Lex
I have some troubles with the cheesy magic box sounds... but I love the sublime reverse effects.
As an ambient musician I think this would be really rad, if it was remixed in half the tempo, in dub style
Lyrics, well.. hmmm, im more into "speak&spell" but it sounds nice and rimes, so its good
/ Lex
-
- KVRAF
- 3057 posts since 9 Apr, 2003
sounds good to me! didn't hear the first version
cool cover art, as one might expect
kind of reminds me of U™ versus U2
nice vocal sound as well as balance of words to music
liked it so much that I played it a second time immediately and added it to my "KvR music" folder
cool cover art, as one might expect
kind of reminds me of U™ versus U2
nice vocal sound as well as balance of words to music
liked it so much that I played it a second time immediately and added it to my "KvR music" folder
5 twelve
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2093 posts since 19 Jun, 2003 from UTM 18 317254E 4295335N (WGS84/NAD83)
Thanks Lex but I gotta ask, what is a "cheesy magic box sound?" 
I love the name, but I don't know exactly what sound it is. As for DM, I like that song a lot but I'm afraid I never consdered anything like that when I set about on this. If anything, it was a reactionary arrangement to a guitar, percussion and keyboard jam session over a bunch of loops - none of which survive intact in this version. Come to think of it - that's pretty much how all my songs are made.
Thanks too havran. I like the U™2 bit. Don't let the lawyers see that though!
I love the name, but I don't know exactly what sound it is. As for DM, I like that song a lot but I'm afraid I never consdered anything like that when I set about on this. If anything, it was a reactionary arrangement to a guitar, percussion and keyboard jam session over a bunch of loops - none of which survive intact in this version. Come to think of it - that's pretty much how all my songs are made.
Thanks too havran. I like the U™2 bit. Don't let the lawyers see that though!
-
- KVRAF
- 2401 posts since 29 Dec, 2002 from In the dark
Great song!!
I listened to both mixes
but they sound the same, so I don't know what they are complaining about. It is a great song.
I listened to both mixes
