TO ALL Developers of Software Plugins ! Take out Personal Informations from Plugins !

[chk071]

OP clearly has a point and a half - but of course the typical KVR-fanboyism-culture must jump to the defense of all those oh-so-poor and unjustly-attacked developers at every possible occassion...

First thing that came to my mind. The need to speak for another adult, which is even present. WTF.

[Synthack]

.......

[Urs]

OP clearly has a point and a half - but of course the typical KVR-fanboyism-culture must jump to the defense of all those oh-so-poor and unjustly-attacked developers at every possible occassion...

First thing that came to my mind. The need to speak for another adult, which is even present. WTF.

Which nobody did, but your perception may vary.

[chk071]

Perception always varies. That's the nature of it.

[Urs]

Perception always varies. That's the nature of it.

Thank you for confirming that. You got yours, I got mine. I my perception, displaying the user name or some other identifying information is very useful, and thus we made the choice to keep doing that. Your perception may vary on the subject, but that doesn't mean that mine is invalid.

[Introspective]

So, to recap: some users think it is valuable if a soft-synth does NOT display their name or any other PII.

Some developers think that it is valuable if a soft-synth DOES display the user's name and/or other PII.

Well.

Gentlemen: draw your pistols.

[chk071]

Gentlemen: draw your pistols.

Kind of useless with the amount of arrogance displayed here.

I think I brought up some good points, but, hey.

[Introspective]

Gentlemen: draw your pistols.

Kind of useless with the amount of arrogance displayed here.

OH! SHOTS FIRED!

[Synthack]

.......

[chk071]

Gentlemen: draw your pistols.

Kind of useless with the amount of arrogance displayed here.

OH! SHOTS FIRED!

Just stating the obvious.

[jens]

If you're the person putting up tutorials, then just censor the info out via editing. It isn't that hard if you don't move your windows around a lot.

Takes a bit of work but it's definitely doable.

1.) if you're streaming live that option goes out of the window

2) "takes a bit of work" is quite the understatement here


OP clearly has a point and a half - but of course the typical KVR-fanboyism-culture must jump to the defense of all those oh-so-poor and unjustly-attacked developers at every possible occassion...

1. That's easy to fix. If you're going to be doing this for business reasons, you specify that when buying the licence.

Yeah, that helps a lot if you purchased the plugin way before starting to make podcasts.

2. It's not that hard if you are competent with video editors.

I am, so I know that it can be a lot of work. Your post however proves that you are not.

The typical KVR-fanboyism-culture comment makes me think you're kind of immature.

Everything you wrote here makes me think that you are profoundly immature.

[Synthack]

.......

[whyterabbyt]

OP clearly has a point and a half - but of course the typical KVR-fanboyism-culture must jump to the defense of all those oh-so-poor and unjustly-attacked developers at every possible occassion...

First thing that came to my mind. The need to speak for another adult, which is even present. WTF.

First thing that comes to my mind on seeing this is how apt a description it is of the majority of your behaviour at KVR. Devil-advocating against people who have an issue with devs is what you do here, persistently.

[Introspective]

(Maybe we shouldn't let this thread devolve into pure ad hom.)

[wwjd]

probably already been said...

but, maybe don't BROADCAST computer programs that post your info right on them.

it's the first thing I thought of reading the OP