vocal effects on Lady Madonna

[soulata]

Start with McCartney's voice. That man is underrated as a singer, capable of insanely different voice characters.

Underrated? He is literally the most succesful singer, songwriter and musician of all time. People have been crazy about him for the last 60 years.

What I meant is he's recognized as a very influential bass player and one of the top songwriters. He's never in the best singers lists.

k

[LNovik]

Maybe I'll ask Paul, who supposedly lives in a shithole (I myself don't share that view of London), and see if he's just rich enough to buy me a new tube condenser mike. Or, seriously now, is there also a plug-in emulation of a tube condenser mike that I could find? I would think so since there is supposedly a plug in emulation of a Neumann.
And I DO realize that whomever offered that statement about London included a flashing smiley face at the end of it, so perhaps it was said in jest.
All in all, I think the tube condenser mike does seem like a good idea, and I appreciate the suggestion.

[nirm123]

Start with McCartney's voice. That man is underrated as a singer, capable of insanely different voice characters.

Underrated? He is literally the most succesful singer, songwriter and musician of all time. People have been crazy about him for the last 60 years.

What I meant is he's recognized as a very influential bass player and one of the top songwriters. He's never in the best singers lists.

k

not true, he's is in many best singers lists.

1st google search (for "best singers of all time") will land you here: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/musi ... 27-226168/
Mccartney is number 11 in the rollingstone 100 greatest singers of all time.

[soulata]

Start with McCartney's voice. That man is underrated as a singer, capable of insanely different voice characters.

Underrated? He is literally the most succesful singer, songwriter and musician of all time. People have been crazy about him for the last 60 years.

What I meant is he's recognized as a very influential bass player and one of the top songwriters. He's never in the best singers lists.

k

not true, he's is in many best singers lists.

1st google search (for "best singers of all time") will land you here: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/musi ... 27-226168/
Mccartney is number 11 in the rollingstone 100 greatest singers of all time.

I stand corrected.

[vurt]

Maybe I'll ask Paul, who supposedly lives in a shithole (I myself don't share that view of London), and see if he's just rich enough to buy me a new tube condenser mike. Or, seriously now, is there also a plug-in emulation of a tube condenser mike that I could find? I would think so since there is supposedly a plug in emulation of a Neumann.
And I DO realize that whomever offered that statement about London included a flashing smiley face at the end of it, so perhaps it was said in jest.
All in all, I think the tube condenser mike does seem like a good idea, and I appreciate the suggestion.

it was me!
i live ten mins from the house macca was born in, so we laugh about the fact that as soon as they made any cash, they all got away

and my uncle now lives about 5 doors from him in london.

[LNovik]

Ahh. I thought you had said that all of London was a shithole.
LN

[The Main Event]

Start with McCartney's voice. That man is underrated as a singer, capable of insanely different voice characters.

Underrated? He is literally the most succesful singer, songwriter and musician of all time. People have been crazy about him for the last 60 years.

What I meant is he's recognized as a very influential bass player and one of the top songwriters. He's never in the best singers lists.

k

not true, he's is in many best singers lists.

1st google search (for "best singers of all time") will land you here: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/musi ... 27-226168/
Mccartney is number 11 in the rollingstone 100 greatest singers of all time.

Well, i like Paul and the beatles in general, but in a list where Bob Dylan in considered to be the 7th best singer, you cant take that serious.
What a joke.

[muki]

now, is there also a plug-in emulation of a tube condenser mike that I could find?

as i already wrote: slate does such a thing

or try google:
https://www.google.com/search?q=microph ... e&ie=UTF-8

antare used to be quite a well known:
https://www.antarestech.com/product/mic-mod/

and here's a list:
https://iconcollective.edu/best-microph ... g-plugins/

[Plajia]

Start with McCartney's voice. That man is underrated as a singer, capable of insanely different voice characters.

Underrated? He is literally the most succesful singer, songwriter and musician of all time. People have been crazy about him for the last 60 years.

What I meant is he's recognized as a very influential bass player and one of the top songwriters. He's never in the best singers lists.

k

not true, he's is in many best singers lists.

1st google search (for "best singers of all time") will land you here: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/musi ... 27-226168/
Mccartney is number 11 in the rollingstone 100 greatest singers of all time.

Michael Jackson number 25 you cannot take this list serious. its rolling stones. they are worst than ever with their woke politic

[Plajia]

Start with McCartney's voice. That man is underrated as a singer, capable of insanely different voice characters.

Underrated? He is literally the most succesful singer, songwriter and musician of all time. People have been crazy about him for the last 60 years.

What I meant is he's recognized as a very influential bass player and one of the top songwriters. He's never in the best singers lists.

k

not true, he's is in many best singers lists.

1st google search (for "best singers of all time") will land you here: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/musi ... 27-226168/
Mccartney is number 11 in the rollingstone 100 greatest singers of all time.

Well, i like Paul and the beatles in general, but in a list where Bob Dylan in considered to be the 7th best singer, you cant take that serious.
What a joke.

yeah its pretty random shit. lennon was great but as a singer Mccarntey was better. and Thom Yorke could been in there easily if it was serious. feels like a virtue signaling list

[nirm123]

You're missing the point, McCartney is acknowledged as one of the best singers of all time, not only in this list and why wouldn't he be ? He absolutely deserves it, monkberry moon delight !

[CrystalWizard]

yeah its pretty random shit. lennon was great but as a singer Mccarntey was better. and Thom Yorke could been in there easily if it was serious. feels like a virtue signaling list

WTH? "a virtue signalling list?" A popularity list definitely*, but, i have no idea what you mean by virtue signalling in this case.

*had a good laugh when previous poster said Bob Dylan at number 7! That's an even bigger WTH. I doubt i could rate him at 700. Paul is a good vocalist but i don't even think he deserves a spot above 50. Rolling Stone magazine lost the way years ago.

edit: on topic, yes, Neumann mic, close mic'd, and hack off low and hi end to get the "radio effect," McCartneys' voice, as all already mentioned.