"Analog" sample rate conversion (mix at 48khz, deliver at 44.1khz)
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 4 posts since 27 Mar, 2021
Hi,
In your opinion, what sounds worse?
A: digital conversion 48k to 44.1k
B: 48k DA interface to 44.1k AD interface via analog cable
In your opinion, what sounds worse?
A: digital conversion 48k to 44.1k
B: 48k DA interface to 44.1k AD interface via analog cable
https://www.2btruman.com/
Creator of the Genesis Workstation, used by Dua Lipa
Creator of the Genesis Workstation, used by Dua Lipa
- KVRAF
- 15269 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
It depends on many factors. Each thing you use in the chain contributes.
But can you tell the difference?
And why not do the project in 44.1kHz?
But can you tell the difference?
And why not do the project in 44.1kHz?
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
- KVRAF
- 4711 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder
I would just leave it at 48kHz if possible.
- KVRAF
- 4432 posts since 15 Nov, 2006 from Hell
Resampling couldn't possibly sound worse than re-recording. Even the cleanest recording chain will have more distortion than a (reasonable) resampling process.
I don't know what to write here that won't be censored, as I can only speak in profanity.