Double tracking - natural sounding options?
-
- KVRian
- 1078 posts since 27 Nov, 2003 from UK, Polegate
Ok I'm recording acoustic guitar and vocals and trying to find a double tracking effect that sounds good (ie. natural type thing)
Personally I improvise a bit and have a fairly loose (wobbly) style, so recording parts on top isn't something I can always do.
Iv'e tried a few effects (waves, ADT, maybe some more demos) but they don't sound right to these ears IMHO.
I know the trick of nudging 2 of the same audio tracks by milliseconds...I guess I'd like to find something I could hear when I'm playing, and set up on a template track.
Anyone else have thoughts on this ?
One I haven't tried yet which I'm DLing tody to try later,is the Voxengo Spatifier
https://www.voxengo.com/product/spatifier/
Personally I improvise a bit and have a fairly loose (wobbly) style, so recording parts on top isn't something I can always do.
Iv'e tried a few effects (waves, ADT, maybe some more demos) but they don't sound right to these ears IMHO.
I know the trick of nudging 2 of the same audio tracks by milliseconds...I guess I'd like to find something I could hear when I'm playing, and set up on a template track.
Anyone else have thoughts on this ?
One I haven't tried yet which I'm DLing tody to try later,is the Voxengo Spatifier
https://www.voxengo.com/product/spatifier/
-
- KVRAF
- 1606 posts since 9 Jan, 2018
Well, you pretty much have 4 approaches.
1. Record yourself twice with a very rigid timing. Since you like the rubato style of playing, this might sound unnatural or forced to you.
2. Use the Haas effect, which you mention. Create a parallel track of the original. Pan one right, the other left (not too much), and put a 30ms delay on one of the two.
3. Use a software-based doubler; you are already testing a few, so no need to repeat your listing.
4. Record yourself once but use two mics on two different inputs. This can create a very natural stereo effect.
Alternatively you could experiment with parallel tracking. Create a send in your DAW, so that you double the track but instead put a different EQ on it, with very different settings. Shift the pan between the two slightly, or bring the parallel track down in output level. You thicken the sound in a very different and customizable way.
1. Record yourself twice with a very rigid timing. Since you like the rubato style of playing, this might sound unnatural or forced to you.
2. Use the Haas effect, which you mention. Create a parallel track of the original. Pan one right, the other left (not too much), and put a 30ms delay on one of the two.
3. Use a software-based doubler; you are already testing a few, so no need to repeat your listing.
4. Record yourself once but use two mics on two different inputs. This can create a very natural stereo effect.
Alternatively you could experiment with parallel tracking. Create a send in your DAW, so that you double the track but instead put a different EQ on it, with very different settings. Shift the pan between the two slightly, or bring the parallel track down in output level. You thicken the sound in a very different and customizable way.
Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube, and even Deezer, whatever the hell Deezer is.
More fun at Twitter @watchfulactual
More fun at Twitter @watchfulactual
- KVRian
- 631 posts since 10 Jan, 2017
Have you tried https://www.sonnox.com/toolbox/voxdoubler ? Does a decent enough job for me - though admittedly my double tracks are usually mixed in pretty low.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1078 posts since 27 Nov, 2003 from UK, Polegate
Thanks Watchful for your help and informative post ( I had to look up Rubato haha, will try the parallel tracking later, it's a great idea.Watchful wrote: Thu Nov 24, 2022 2:26 pm ...you could experiment with parallel tracking. Create a send in your DAW, so that you double the track but instead put a different EQ on it, with very different settings. Shift the pan between the two slightly, or bring the parallel track down in output level. You thicken the sound in a very different and customizable way.
thanks andymcbain, I'll do the 15 day trial of this alongside the voxengo demoandymcbain wrote: Thu Nov 24, 2022 2:30 pm Have you tried <span class="skimlinks-unlinked">https://www.sonnox.com/toolbox/voxdoubler</span> ? Does a decent enough job for me - though admittedly my double tracks are usually mixed in pretty low.
Thanks Ploki I'll look into itPloki wrote: Thu Nov 24, 2022 7:00 pm nothing really sounds as convincing as actual double tracking.
Eventide Microshift or something similar
-
- Boss Lovin' DR
- 14312 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from the grimness of yorkshire
Another method to try (and one which I've had the best results with) is using audio warping tools on a copy of the take to add deviations in timing. Melodyne has the add random deviations function;
https://helpcenter.celemony.com/assista ... l%20timing.
FL studio has Newtime which you can use to quantize audio to a lot of different groove templates, essentially giving the same effect;
https://www.image-line.com/fl-studio-le ... ewtime.htm
I'm sure there are plenty of others.
If you use some of the other tricks above as well, invert the phase of one of the tracks, and/or shift the formant, you can get pretty serviceable results.
https://helpcenter.celemony.com/assista ... l%20timing.
FL studio has Newtime which you can use to quantize audio to a lot of different groove templates, essentially giving the same effect;
https://www.image-line.com/fl-studio-le ... ewtime.htm
I'm sure there are plenty of others.
If you use some of the other tricks above as well, invert the phase of one of the tracks, and/or shift the formant, you can get pretty serviceable results.
-
- KVRAF
- 2285 posts since 20 Dec, 2002 from The Benighted States of Trumpistan
-
- KVRAF
- 1637 posts since 28 Jul, 2006
With the nudging 2 audio tracks trick you also need to adjust the pitch of the extra tracks up and down by cents in opposite directions.
-
- KVRAF
- 1606 posts since 9 Jan, 2018
Yes, otherwise they'll phase or chorus.
Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube, and even Deezer, whatever the hell Deezer is.
More fun at Twitter @watchfulactual
More fun at Twitter @watchfulactual
-
- KVRAF
- 2719 posts since 2 Jul, 2010
To elaborate: nudging an exact copy of the track is just comb filtering, which is almost certainly not what OP wants.
To be honest my favourite technique in the "double-tracking" space is just a send to a good old-fashioned 16th-note grungy tape slapback. The trick to avoid a distracting artificial effect is not to mix it too high.
I'm not really sure what "natural-sounding" double-tracking would be anyway. The classic studio "thickening" effect of overdubs is not the real-world sound of multiple singers in unison.
To be honest my favourite technique in the "double-tracking" space is just a send to a good old-fashioned 16th-note grungy tape slapback. The trick to avoid a distracting artificial effect is not to mix it too high.
I'm not really sure what "natural-sounding" double-tracking would be anyway. The classic studio "thickening" effect of overdubs is not the real-world sound of multiple singers in unison.

