I am with you on this. Had great expectations about Emulator X (have always been a fan of E-Mu). Unfortunalley, Creative went down, and dragged E-Mu with it. Emulator X was abandoned. I just wish someone would be able to pick it and revive it.
Sad state of Native Instruments
- KVRAF
- 11093 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRAF
- 10535 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
I had so many great instrument banks for that one. Virus, Microwave - there was a lot of stuff out there for it. Plus, the effects were top shelf.
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 6214 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
I'm not a PC user but I always thought about setting up a PC to use this. I quickly switched to EMU for sampling, owned an E3 and the E6400 Ultra. I loved the artifacts in the filters on those things, especially the band pass.
-
- KVRAF
- 2641 posts since 23 Jun, 2006 from Hungary
could someone explain to me why we dont see such multieffect from ni:
MusicRadar
https://www.musicradar.com › devi...
Devious Machines Infiltrator 2 review
NI created many effects and obviously they have the knowledge.
So what? why should i turn to developers like devious machines?
MusicRadar
https://www.musicradar.com › devi...
Devious Machines Infiltrator 2 review
NI created many effects and obviously they have the knowledge.
So what? why should i turn to developers like devious machines?
Youtube channel: https://youtube.com/@SoftSynthPortal
- KVRAF
- 6980 posts since 28 Dec, 2015 from Atlantis Island
Molekular?
https://sonograyn.bandcamp.com/music Experimental Ambient
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
-
- KVRian
- 965 posts since 7 Dec, 2017
Guitar Rig is kind of a multi effectdune_rave wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 7:32 pm could someone explain to me why we dont see such multieffect from ni:
MusicRadar
https://www.musicradar.com › devi...
Devious Machines Infiltrator 2 review
NI created many effects and obviously they have the knowledge.
So what? why should i turn to developers like devious machines?
- KVRian
- 633 posts since 11 Dec, 2004
That's unfortunate for many of us.
But sadly, now, Native Instruments is a hardware company.
They make shitloads of money selling DJ controllers, midi controllers, and Maschine.
They also make lots of money with Kontakt licenses.
So they probably don't want to go down the rabbit hole of developing cutting edge software, they're just not there. Because they choose to go somewhere else.
My opinion
But sadly, now, Native Instruments is a hardware company.
They make shitloads of money selling DJ controllers, midi controllers, and Maschine.
They also make lots of money with Kontakt licenses.
So they probably don't want to go down the rabbit hole of developing cutting edge software, they're just not there. Because they choose to go somewhere else.
My opinion
-
- KVRist
- 72 posts since 15 Aug, 2020
The hardware is in support of the software business. Every hardware unit has to be developed, paid for to be manufactured, shipped, held in stock, warranted, repaired etc Whereas once software is developed every additional sale is theoretically 100% profit. Of course it still has to be supported and updated, but the costs are minimal compared to hardware.
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 6214 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
Personally having been a customer forever I think it's not a matter of "cutting edge", it's that it's easier to sell most people "new" Kontakt instruments like Straylight than develop Reaktor into a more streamlined app for creating instruments and FX. I like Massive X, but I don't really care that much about NI's synths, it's always been Reaktor and Kontakt that are/were outstanding products from them. My issues with them are the same as they are with most music software developers, they implement a feature, it needs a little more work, (Reaktors current hosting etc.) and it never gets done in favor of chasing some new tech that can create a buzz in marketing.tristan- wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 8:28 pm That's unfortunate for many of us.
But sadly, now, Native Instruments is a hardware company.
They make shitloads of money selling DJ controllers, midi controllers, and Maschine.
They also make lots of money with Kontakt licenses.
So they probably don't want to go down the rabbit hole of developing cutting edge software, they're just not there. Because they choose to go somewhere else.
My opinion
Again, if NI don't announce some AI BS in Komplete 15 or whatever, I'm going to be really surprised.
- KVRian
- 1124 posts since 21 Jul, 2012
NI don't have to because Guitar Rig is capable of all of that. It's just that most people are ignorant to its true potential.dune_rave wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 7:32 pm could someone explain to me why we dont see such multieffect from ni:
MusicRadar
https://www.musicradar.com › devi...
Devious Machines Infiltrator 2 review
NI created many effects and obviously they have the knowledge.
So what? why should i turn to developers like devious machines?
- Beware the Quoth
- 33175 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
That doesnt necessarily mean that he's wrong about hardware being where they might make most money these days, though. Its not as though other companies dont survive on hardware only.Lairyboy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:31 pm The hardware is in support of the software business. Every hardware unit has to be developed, paid for to be manufactured, shipped, held in stock, warranted, repaired etc Whereas once software is developed every additional sale is theoretically 100% profit. Of course it still has to be supported and updated, but the costs are minimal compared to hardware.
I doubt, though, that NI's accountants are going to turn up here to say what's on their books, though, so we're all guessing.
my other modular synth is a bugbrand
- KVRAF
- 2934 posts since 27 Aug, 2004
Which is surprising considering everyone says things like "Guitar Rig is the wrong name for it because it is not that good on guitar but really great as an FX Rig."LFO8 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 26, 2023 6:22 amNI don't have to because Guitar Rig is capable of all of that. It's just that most people are ignorant to its true potential.dune_rave wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 7:32 pm could someone explain to me why we dont see such multieffect from ni:
MusicRadar
https://www.musicradar.com › devi...
Devious Machines Infiltrator 2 review
NI created many effects and obviously they have the knowledge.
So what? why should i turn to developers like devious machines?
Even if the piano player can't play, keep the party going.
http://www.soundclick.com/mumpcake
https://mumpfucious.wordpress.com/
http://www.soundclick.com/mumpcake
https://mumpfucious.wordpress.com/
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 6214 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
I have. Almost no one rates Guitar Rig as the best amp modeling software, but the FX are great. I would agree with this, I use Amplitube these days, but I used Guitar Rig for years, it's not bad, it just takes more work to get good tone out of than Amplitube.
None of this matters if you like or prefer it over the competition though. Some people will only use Marshall, some like Peavy.
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105872 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
orange ftwmachinesworking wrote: ↑Thu Jan 26, 2023 7:29 pmI have. Almost no one rates Guitar Rig as the best amp modeling software, but the FX are great. I would agree with this, I use Amplitube these days, but I used Guitar Rig for years, it's not bad, it just takes more work to get good tone out of than Amplitube.
None of this matters if you like or prefer it over the competition though. Some people will only use Marshall, some like Peavy.