Yeah, not going to lie, I've purposely avoided Eurorack for longer than I should have because it's too cramped. I started on some vintage gear that is much more spread out than Eurorack. When you look at vintage Roland or Moog gear it seems like a lot of wasted space, but, the cabling does not really get in the way of performing. Eurorack, not so much.Shabdahbriah wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:08 pmSeriously! THIS entire 9Ux126hp set-up is barely 16" tall, and 25" wide:pdxindy wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 3:24 pm What's not so fun is how small eurorack is. I wish all my euro modules were twice the size for ease of use.
3Ux126hp.png
I do think that 5U is too big. 4U is about perfect, but there aren't many choices, certainly not cost effective ones. If you're going to go all DIY, then it's a good choice, but that has its own issues of economy.
The thing is, there's a tendency for cramping to get worse in 3u, not better. Cram more and more into a tiny space, more features, narrower modules, cram more into fewer HP. This can take the joy out of using a modular. I think that some cramped module are ok, but it really helps to not get addicted to "the most function in the smallest space" just because it will save you money on case space.
Behringer has bucked the trend with their spacious modules, but, they definitely have low utility for the space. A balance is making this tolerable for me. This is balance in all directions. That is, if the row above is cramped, then make the row below less cramped. There is no magic solution. If you put all the jacks at the bottom or side of a module, you keep the knob twiddling space free, but, you visually disconnect the jack from the feature. This can be ok, or not. It's usually more ok if you like to patch first then play. If you like to actively patch while playing, it's less enjoyable.
It also seems to matter less if a module is a set it and forget it kind of module. But if I need to make an adjustment, I want significant space around the important knobs.

