Pardon?Timfonie wrote:The recreation is a little slower. That's all!Sascha Franck wrote:Here's the original in comparison with the "recreation":
http://home.arcor.de/s.franck/billie.mp3![]()
The recreation is using a 16th note shaker which simply isn't present in the original not at all. It's ALL 8th notes, even the shaker entering after 4 bars. This is the HUGE difference!
Apart from that, the sounds used in the "recreation" aren't even remotely close to those used on the original. There's no claps at all and kick/snare on the original sound like real drums whereas the recreated ones are sounding like machine drums.
[Edited for whatever reasons...]
Seriously, I don't mean to slag off the attempts at a cover, but regarding the beat there's NO similarities at ALL, others than a kick on 1+3 and a snare on 2+4 - which would just be as similar to any contemporary groove from the last 30 years.
Regarding all other aspects it's got nothing to do with the original at all.
