Ooh, I like This Modular Rack...

Anything about hardware musical instruments.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Stefken wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 6:52 pm I like the sound of the BIA but this in a digital device. It is code. You can have it in plugin form (so unlimited instances ) for 50 dollars. One hardware unit is 400 bucks. :dog:
So, it s in there as not to forget about it, but this is very difficult to justify.
Price aside (and I know it can't usually be set aside), I've found that the Noise Engineering stuff often has a somewhat different sound and very different feel in plugin vs. hardware form. If nothing else, just going from a CV-controlled monophonic oscillator to a MIDI-controlled polyphonic synth voice is a pretty big step.

In some cases I found I prefer working with the plugin.

Loquelic I feel is easier to dial in in plugin form -- the hardware has completely separate tuning for the A and B oscillators and if you try to transpose/tune with the knob, you're also affecting the ratio between them which changes the timbre. In the software you can set precise cents/semis/octaves on both so it's no problem.

BIA... when I had the hardware I felt like it always gravitated toward being a badass kick drum, which sounded great but was not what I needed. The plugin form feels like it encourages more variety, somehow. It's totally subjective I'm sure.

Manis Iteritas to me sounds slightly more solid in hardware form than the plugin, and the plugin also lacks a drone mode which annoys me a bit. But I've had some fun rapidly triggering MIDI notes with the Grid to get it to "drone" and do some completely different stuff -- it almost acts like a resonator at times. Overall, I wasn't able to justify keeping Manis in my rack in the face of its competition, so I'm glad to have the plugin.

Cursus Iteritas... it's been a while since I owned it, but my gut feeling is the module has more edge and spiciness to it, where the plugin is more mellow and probably my least favorite of theirs. I wish I could borrow one just to see -- maybe it comes down to usage habits, or maybe it's something about the clock-rate-follows-osc-frequency thing that it does. If I wasn't full of oscillators already I'd think about hunting one down.

Virt Iter Legio I think sounds way better as a module than the Arturia Minifreak models that are theoretically the same algorithm. The plugin is somewhere in between, with the module sounding more solid and also offering phase modulation inputs. I feel like being able to switch it to other firmware at no extra cost boosts the value proposition. On the other hand, Virt Vereor is free...

On the Versio line, I keep two of them in the rack and feel justified in doing so, but at the same time, I use the Ruina, Desmodus and Electus plugins fairly regularly too (but again, Ruina is free).

ghettosynth wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 7:57 pm Are you talking about Monome's (discontinued but open hardware) Teletype?
Yep. Didn't realize it was discontinued though. There's also a VCV Rack port, not officially released but on github.

Post

foosnark wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:31 pm Virt Vereor
i know im a nobody, but would it have killed them to use a u? :cry:
:ud:

Post

foosnark wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:31 pm Yep. Didn't realize it was discontinued though. There's also a VCV Rack port, not officially released but on github.
Thanks for that. That should be enough for me to try it out and see if I want to build one. I have expert sleepers CV in/out through ADAT and Teletype isn't audio rate. I like general things, e.g. Disting, Lich, but they can be too general and I'm not sure if I'll actually like using Teletype or if I'll find it annoying.

Post

vurt wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:35 pm
foosnark wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:31 pm Virt Vereor
i know im a nobody, but would it have killed them to use a u? :cry:
Maybe they should issue you a 1-off, or else some creative and sharpie skills (silver plate)?

Post

elxsound wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:41 pm
vurt wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:35 pm
foosnark wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:31 pm Virt Vereor
i know im a nobody, but would it have killed them to use a u? :cry:
Maybe they should issue you a 1-off, or else some creative and sharpie skills (silver plate)?
tbh, id not even heard of it till just reading foosnarks post :hihi:
i know a few of the others, but their names make them quite forgettable :lol:
:ud:

Post

vurt wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:46 pm
elxsound wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:41 pm
vurt wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:35 pm
foosnark wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:31 pm Virt Vereor
i know im a nobody, but would it have killed them to use a u? :cry:
Maybe they should issue you a 1-off, or else some creative and sharpie skills (silver plate)?
tbh, id not even heard of it till just reading foosnarks post :hihi:
i know a few of the others, but their names make them quite forgettable :lol:
Right!?! Jesus. Lapsos Os is the only Noise Engineering module I like well enough to remember the name. I have three others, but I'd have to look them up.

Post

vurt wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:35 pm
foosnark wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:31 pm Virt Vereor
i know im a nobody, but would it have killed them to use a u? :cry:
:D :D
Are there still tickets for your standup comedian show or was it sold out in an hour? :hyper:

Post

I have not ordered a module today.

Post

ghettosynth wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:40 pm Thanks for that. That should be enough for me to try it out and see if I want to build one. I have expert sleepers CV in/out through ADAT and Teletype isn't audio rate. I like general things, e.g. Disting, Lich, but they can be too general and I'm not sure if I'll actually like using Teletype or if I'll find it annoying.
Yeah, with stuff like that the only way to know is to try. I was pretty annoyed by Disting once the novelty wore off, and ditto for ER-301.

I don't use Teletype in every patch by a long stretch, but being a programmer, the idea of writing a couple of lines of code to cover whatever CV or gate utility I need at the time appeals to me. I don't have all the syntax memorized, but the basics cover a lot of ground, and I find it friendlier to me than looking up Disting algorithms on a cheat sheet.

Post

foosnark wrote: Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:34 am
ghettosynth wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:40 pm Thanks for that. That should be enough for me to try it out and see if I want to build one. I have expert sleepers CV in/out through ADAT and Teletype isn't audio rate. I like general things, e.g. Disting, Lich, but they can be too general and I'm not sure if I'll actually like using Teletype or if I'll find it annoying.
Yeah, with stuff like that the only way to know is to try. I was pretty annoyed by Disting once the novelty wore off, and ditto for ER-301.

I don't use Teletype in every patch by a long stretch, but being a programmer, the idea of writing a couple of lines of code to cover whatever CV or gate utility I need at the time appeals to me. I don't have all the syntax memorized, but the basics cover a lot of ground, and I find it friendlier to me than looking up Disting algorithms on a cheat sheet.
I agree, that's really appealing. When I first saw Teletype I thought that it was primarily a live-coding app ala Chuck/SonicPI. I confess, I'm not into that. However, as a more general PAMs that relies on expressions, I'm very much into that. I'm not, however, into having a keyboard plugged into my rack so I might just prefer using it with VCV. I'll dig in a bit just as soon as the big studio re-org gets wrapped up. (The re-org is big, my studio is tiny).

Post

For my Teletype I use a Logitech Unifying USB dongle and it recognizes it just fine (you just have to pair the dongle using a computer first). I have a Logitech K780 wireless keyboard that can switch between devices with a keypress, so I use it both for my PC and for Teletype. Not my favorite keyboard to type on (I prefer mechanical) but good enough, and I like that it's fairly compact.

Post

vurt wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:46 pm i know a few of the others, but their names make them quite forgettable :lol:
I think that's the Satis Obliviosus.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

I m fond of the SQ-1 on my virtual MS-20V.
I m looking at the Behringer 960 + 962 companion.
It has quite a bit of tricks up its sleeve. And the price is very nice.

Any counterindications? It is big but i ll be ordering a 6u rack, so....

I like that on the SQ-1 you can set the sequence to e.g. 11 for an evolving off beat syncopated riff.
That s not possible on the 960 but i guess i could put a 2x6 sequence with the switch.
I guess you can also trigger some simple beat sequence alongside your sequence with the trigger row?






The model switch trick on a macro oscillator is pretty nice :)


Post

I actually really like the 960 and 962 combination. Great options for the price.

I probably don't need one since I have 0-Ctrl, but it'd fun to have this too. Again great prices. It's a beast! but that's not always a bad thing.

Post

elxsound wrote: Tue Mar 14, 2023 5:58 pm I actually really like the 960 and 962 combination. Great options for the price.

I probably don't need one since I have 0-Ctrl, but it'd fun to have this too. Again great prices. It's a beast! but that's not always a bad thing.
I have them both, I don't use the 962 enough to justify the $80 bump in price and I wish that I wouldn't have bothered. That said, I love the 960 and I really enjoy using this type of sequencer in a modular setup. At the moment I'm not planning on ordering a second one, but that may change. More likely, I will order something similar from someone else to act as a companion. I skipped the B.ARP sequencer but I have the mix sequencer. I don't really know at this point what would make a great companion, but it won't involve menu diving and it won't involve CPUs. It might involve DIY.

Post Reply

Return to “Hardware (Instruments and Effects)”