Edirol UA-101 routing questions
-
- KVRian
- 534 posts since 22 Mar, 2006 from Adelaide, Australia
Im interested in getting a second hand Edirol UA-101 to act as a Pre/AD/DA for an RME Digiface USB. I am hoping people who own one can answer a couple of questions
Most importantly, would routing the optical inputs of the UA-101 direct to the analogue line and headphone outs, and simultaneously, the analogue mic/inst inputs direct to the optical outputs, bypassing the computer entirely, be possible?
And would the UA-101 still work as a USB MIDI interface, when plugged in to a modern mac or windows machine?
Most importantly, would routing the optical inputs of the UA-101 direct to the analogue line and headphone outs, and simultaneously, the analogue mic/inst inputs direct to the optical outputs, bypassing the computer entirely, be possible?
And would the UA-101 still work as a USB MIDI interface, when plugged in to a modern mac or windows machine?
- KVRAF
- 2982 posts since 31 Jan, 2003 from Ghent, Belgium
Routing optical is done by the Digiface software and/or DAW.matthewjumps wrote: Mon Jul 31, 2023 6:42 am Im interested in getting a second hand Edirol UA-101 to act as a Pre/AD/DA for an RME Digiface USB. I am hoping people who own one can answer a couple of questions
Most importantly, would routing the optical inputs of the UA-101 direct to the analogue line and headphone outs, and simultaneously, the analogue mic/inst inputs direct to the optical outputs, bypassing the computer entirely, be possible?
Whether the Digiface can operate standalone -> see its manual/specifications (My Fireface UC can, but don't have need for it)
In my case: Fireface UC + (ADAT) ADDA8200 -> I can route any input and output of my ADAT device to any other input or output - using Cubase or the RME software.
https://www.roland.com/us/products/ua-101/downloads/matthewjumps wrote: Mon Jul 31, 2023 6:42 am And would the UA-101 still work as a USB MIDI interface, when plugged in to a modern mac or windows machine?
It has Windows 10 drivers, so it will probably work in W11 too (no guarantees). Can't tell you anything about macs.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 534 posts since 22 Mar, 2006 from Adelaide, Australia
I understand that the Digiface optical routing is done using RMEs software. That is not what I am talking about. I am also not talking about running the Digiface standalone.T-CM11 wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 10:53 am Routing optical is done by the Digiface software and/or DAW. Whether the Digiface can operate standalone -> see its manual/specifications (My Fireface UC can, but don't have need for it)
In my case: Fireface UC + (ADAT) ADDA8200 -> I can route any input and output of my ADAT device to any other input or output - using Cubase or the RME software.
What I am specifically talking about is the Edirol UA-101 operating in the place of the ADA8200 in your setup. The ADA8200 routes its analogue ins directly to its digital outs, and its digital ins to its analogue outs, allowing it to be used as a Pre/AD/DA converter
In order to do that with the Edirol UA-101 I need to know if the UA-101 can be set up to act like the ADA8200, eg route its analogue mic/line inputs direct to its optical outputs, and route its optical inputs to its analogue main line outs/headphone outs
- KVRAF
- 2982 posts since 31 Jan, 2003 from Ghent, Belgium
The Edirol UA-101 is SPDIF, not ADAT. So only stereo out and in via optical.matthewjumps wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 11:02 am What I am specifically talking about is the Edirol UA-101 operating in the place of the ADA8200 in your setup. The ADA8200 routes its analogue ins directly to its digital outs, and its digital ins to its analogue outs, allowing it to be used as a Pre/AD/DA converter
In order to do that with the Edirol UA-101 I need to know if the UA-101 can be set up to act like the ADA8200, eg route its analogue mic/line inputs direct to its optical outputs, and route its optical inputs to its analogue main line outs/headphone outs
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 534 posts since 22 Mar, 2006 from Adelaide, Australia
I know that. It has optical SPDIF I/O - which the Digiface is capable of sending/receiving.
Again, the only thing I am interested in is if the UA-101 is capable of supporting the routing I need. I have done my research on every other aspect, I just cant find clear info on the direct routing capabilities of optical IO of the UA-101
Just so we are clear - analogue 1 + 2 in need to be directly routed to the stereo SPDIF optical out, bypassing the USB/PC connection. And similarly, the stereo SPDIF optical in needs to be directly routed to analogue out 1 + 2, and the headphones
Can the UA-101 support that
Again, the only thing I am interested in is if the UA-101 is capable of supporting the routing I need. I have done my research on every other aspect, I just cant find clear info on the direct routing capabilities of optical IO of the UA-101
Just so we are clear - analogue 1 + 2 in need to be directly routed to the stereo SPDIF optical out, bypassing the USB/PC connection. And similarly, the stereo SPDIF optical in needs to be directly routed to analogue out 1 + 2, and the headphones
Can the UA-101 support that
- KVRAF
- 16880 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
The patch bay of the UA-101 should support routing of analog I/O (ch1-8) to digital (channels 9 & 10)
But I highly doubt this device will work at all without a USB connection to a computer.
But I highly doubt this device will work at all without a USB connection to a computer.
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. 
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 534 posts since 22 Mar, 2006 from Adelaide, Australia
I am okay with it being plugged in over USB as long as the routing is direct AD/DA. It does have a separate DC input though, which makes me think it might work standalone?
Honestly ideally I can get it running via USB, and still maintain MIDI support
Honestly ideally I can get it running via USB, and still maintain MIDI support
- KVRAF
- 16880 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
Driver support for the UA-101 is quite limited. I would not gamble it.
I'd advice to buy a second-hand Behringer ADA8000 and a headphone amp, or a mixer with ADAT.
I'd advice to buy a second-hand Behringer ADA8000 and a headphone amp, or a mixer with ADAT.
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. 
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 534 posts since 22 Mar, 2006 from Adelaide, Australia
I have an ADA8200 in my home studio, I have been contemplating something like you said, but it really starts to get away from the whole 'portable' thing. An RME Digiface + a half rack width USB powered unit like the UA-101 is a lot more portable than an RME Digiface + a full rack width ADA8000 + a headphone amp.
As far as mixers goes, I am all ears - is there anything small, cheap and portable with optical I/O you can think of?
As far as mixers goes, I am all ears - is there anything small, cheap and portable with optical I/O you can think of?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 534 posts since 22 Mar, 2006 from Adelaide, Australia
I have found people in reviews say that the UA-101 can operate in standalone mode, I wonder if that is the case then all I really need is to configure the routing once on an older machine, then I can use it indefinitely?
That wont give me the MIDI I/O if I cant get the drivers to work on newer machines, but that is not as important to me.
I would just love actual confirmation from someone who owns one, re the routing and I guess re standalone mode
That wont give me the MIDI I/O if I cant get the drivers to work on newer machines, but that is not as important to me.
I would just love actual confirmation from someone who owns one, re the routing and I guess re standalone mode
- KVRAF
- 16880 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. 
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
- KVRist
- 175 posts since 1 Apr, 2022
I have been owning UA-101 for about 15 years.
I'm still using as multi-out interface from PC + UVI Falcon Standalone.
It works well on Windows 11 latest.
I think this setting will mix all inputs and outputs mixed audio (MONITOR OUT) to SPDIF.
I'm still using as multi-out interface from PC + UVI Falcon Standalone.
It works well on Windows 11 latest.
I think this setting will mix all inputs and outputs mixed audio (MONITOR OUT) to SPDIF.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 534 posts since 22 Mar, 2006 from Adelaide, Australia
Good to hear from someone who actually owns and uses it, thanks for the reply
That is awesome, that gives me hope that I can get it working on macOS 11.5 too
I would just want to route the analogue mic/line inputs to SPDIF out directly, bypassing the computer/DAW. I would also want to route the SPDIF inputs to the line out/headphone out directly, bypassing the computer/DAW. Reckon that is doable?DNnX wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 8:03 am I think this setting will mix all inputs and outputs mixed audio (MONITOR OUT) to SPDIF.
- KVRAF
- 16880 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
Have you bought that DigiFace already?
If not: use just an Edirol UA-101. It's a full blown interface, not much wrong with it, and portable as you wanted.
How you sketched it with chaining them, to me that sounds like a recipe for surprises, headaches and disaster. I truely don't know what a DigiFace (other than bring a RME product) brings to your table. S/PDif is not free of extra latency.
If not: use just an Edirol UA-101. It's a full blown interface, not much wrong with it, and portable as you wanted.
How you sketched it with chaining them, to me that sounds like a recipe for surprises, headaches and disaster. I truely don't know what a DigiFace (other than bring a RME product) brings to your table. S/PDif is not free of extra latency.
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. 
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 534 posts since 22 Mar, 2006 from Adelaide, Australia
I have the Digiface USB. It is lightning fast, and rock solid. Plugged into my old 2020 M1 Macbook Pro, I am getting RTL times only 0.5ms slower than my audio desktop rig using an RME PCIe card.
I am very happy with that being the core of the rig. I just want to use the Edirol (or something like it) as the pres/AD/DA. And if it is anything like almost any other AD/DA, it likely wont add much more latency to the Digifaces already lightning fast RTL.
If I was going to use something else as the interface, not the RME, I would get a new one, not something old and second hand like the Edirol. But literally every new interface I tested other than the RME has an absolute bare minimum of 6+ms latency even at lowest buffer sizes.
The point of this thread is about using the UA-101 (or something similar) as the front end of the RME, so I get the RME drivers, low latency performance, stability, etc
I am very happy with that being the core of the rig. I just want to use the Edirol (or something like it) as the pres/AD/DA. And if it is anything like almost any other AD/DA, it likely wont add much more latency to the Digifaces already lightning fast RTL.
If I was going to use something else as the interface, not the RME, I would get a new one, not something old and second hand like the Edirol. But literally every new interface I tested other than the RME has an absolute bare minimum of 6+ms latency even at lowest buffer sizes.
The point of this thread is about using the UA-101 (or something similar) as the front end of the RME, so I get the RME drivers, low latency performance, stability, etc
