Can I do this as a send in Reaper?
-
- KVRAF
- 1562 posts since 31 Dec, 2020
I have a part with a pair of fx (a and b).
I have another part and both are sending to another channel to share a delay fx. There are no fx on the second part
I want the delay on the first part to come back between fx a and b.
How do I do that?
Not sure I can make that example any clearer if it doesn't make sense. Thanks
I have another part and both are sending to another channel to share a delay fx. There are no fx on the second part
I want the delay on the first part to come back between fx a and b.
How do I do that?
Not sure I can make that example any clearer if it doesn't make sense. Thanks
Muh bandcamp: https://automatedhero.bandcamp.com/?fro ... _dashboard
- addled muppet weed
- 111292 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
what do you mean "between fx a and b"
as in serial from a - z - b?
z = delay.
as in serial from a - z - b?
z = delay.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1562 posts since 31 Dec, 2020
yesvurt wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2023 7:34 pm what do you mean "between fx a and b"
as in serial from a - z - b?
z = delay.
Muh bandcamp: https://automatedhero.bandcamp.com/?fro ... _dashboard
- addled muppet weed
- 111292 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
are a and b inserts on the other track?
- KVRAF
- 8563 posts since 2 Aug, 2005 from Guitar Land, USA
I think I understand, I would just put the delay on the one track with the 2 effects and put another instance of the delay on another track lol.
It sounds impossible to route to me, so which way is right?
It sounds impossible to route to me, so which way is right?
The only site for experimental amp sim freeware & MIDI FX: http://runbeerrun.blogspot.com
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
- addled muppet weed
- 111292 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
that's what im thinkingRunBeerRun wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2023 8:33 pm I think I understand, I would just put the delay on the one track with the 2 effects and put another instance of the delay on another track lol.
It sounds impossible to route to me, so which way is right?
just checking that's what he's after, which yes, sounds unpossible.
- KVRAF
- 2061 posts since 8 Feb, 2013 from Switzerland
Be aware you are dealing with a feedback loop. So good lord turn down the volume of your monitoring system while experimenting with this routing!
1. Your Part 1 is on Track 1 with FX A + B. Create and move a new Track above Track 1. Now your Part 1 is on Track 2. Make Track 2 a child track. Your Track 1 gets a folder/parent track.
2. Move FX B to Track 1. Concept: You route Track 2 with FX A through to Track 1 with FX B. So your Part 1 is in series processed by FX A + B like before.
Part 1 can only be heard through Track 1 (folder/parent track). On Track 3 is your Part 2. On Track 4 is your Delay.
3. Send signal in parallel from Track 1 and 3 to track 4 (Delay).
4. On Track 1 (folder track) add a receive from Track 4 (Delay).
5. In the Project Settings (Advanced tab) enable 'Allow feedback in routing (can result in lower performance, louder noises)’
EDIT: Because now better explanation I hope.
1. Your Part 1 is on Track 1 with FX A + B. Create and move a new Track above Track 1. Now your Part 1 is on Track 2. Make Track 2 a child track. Your Track 1 gets a folder/parent track.
2. Move FX B to Track 1. Concept: You route Track 2 with FX A through to Track 1 with FX B. So your Part 1 is in series processed by FX A + B like before.
Part 1 can only be heard through Track 1 (folder/parent track). On Track 3 is your Part 2. On Track 4 is your Delay.
3. Send signal in parallel from Track 1 and 3 to track 4 (Delay).
4. On Track 1 (folder track) add a receive from Track 4 (Delay).
5. In the Project Settings (Advanced tab) enable 'Allow feedback in routing (can result in lower performance, louder noises)’
EDIT: Because now better explanation I hope.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1562 posts since 31 Dec, 2020
No, because then they would be sent to the second part and I don't want that
Muh bandcamp: https://automatedhero.bandcamp.com/?fro ... _dashboard
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1562 posts since 31 Dec, 2020
I'm asking because fewer instances of fx is easier on the cpu. Otherwise i'd just use multiple instances of the effects in questionvurt wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2023 8:40 pmthat's what im thinkingRunBeerRun wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2023 8:33 pm I think I understand, I would just put the delay on the one track with the 2 effects and put another instance of the delay on another track lol.
It sounds impossible to route to me, so which way is right?
just checking that's what he's after, which yes, sounds unpossible.
Muh bandcamp: https://automatedhero.bandcamp.com/?fro ... _dashboard
- KVRAF
- 1626 posts since 28 Jan, 2004
If this is what you're trying to do then it's technically possible but I wouldn't recommend it. The main problem as I see it is that you would get the delayed signal from track 2 on track 1. Also, if the send is POST-FX then you'd get a feedback loop which will likely cause problems. It make's much more sense to add the delay as an insert on track 1 between the two effects.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

- KVRAF
- 11375 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
Reaper has freely assignable routing (including feedback if you enable that option in preferences) so pretty much everything should be possible.
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle