I am so happy they didn’t. Nothing wrong with anyone wanting it, I just never use those faders and pads and prefer not seeing something that never gets use.
I just want a nice keybed, MIDI 2.0 and I’m looking forward to plugin integration with u-he.
I am so happy they didn’t. Nothing wrong with anyone wanting it, I just never use those faders and pads and prefer not seeing something that never gets use.
If a plugin developer codes NKS2 compatability into their plugin, will it work with "basic" NKS1 benefits on the older hardware, or is it incompatible? Are we looking at a backwards compatible new format for developers to code for or not? It sounds more and more like there will be great compromises since developers aren't required to write as much code, so older hardware will be asking for pixels that possibly will not be there.EvilDragon wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 8:08 pm NKS2 products won't show the NKS2 benefits on mk1 and mk2 keyboards, since their hardware platform is not compatible with what mk3 keyboards are using (mk3s basically have a whole computer that renders stuff on the displays, this wasn't the case for mk1 or mk2 which just had some microcontroller and were shoveling pixels sent from your computer onto the display - very different approach).
I just wish for more encoders which make controlling their software synths more hands on.
Wouldn't you like 8 faders for controlling envelopes, another 5 knobs for just the filter and 9 for the oscillators for controlling diva or hive?elxsound wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 9:45 pmI am so happy they didn’t. Nothing wrong with anyone wanting it, I just never use those faders and pads and prefer not seeing something that never gets use.
I just want a nice keybed, MIDI 2.0 and I’m looking forward to plugin integration with u-he.
NKS1 implementation is entirely separate to NKS2. Both need to exist to have a proper fallback.machinesworking wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 9:51 pmIf a plugin developer codes NKS2 compatability into their plugin, will it work with "basic" NKS1 benefits on the older hardware, or is it incompatible? Are we looking at a backwards compatible new format for developers to code for or not? It sounds more and more like there will be great compromises since developers aren't required to write as much code, so older hardware will be asking for pixels that possibly will not be there.
rod_zero wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 10:02 pmWouldn't you like 8 faders for controlling envelopes, another 5 knobs for just the filter and 9 for the oscillators for controlling diva or hive?elxsound wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 9:45 pmI am so happy they didn’t. Nothing wrong with anyone wanting it, I just never use those faders and pads and prefer not seeing something that never gets use.
I just want a nice keybed, MIDI 2.0 and I’m looking forward to plugin integration with u-he.
Capitalism is the reason we even have these products in the first place. So I wouldn't be too harsh about it.
So NKS1 and keyboards with NKS1 will eventually be deprecated, i.e. developers will have to do two sets of code to support both NKS1 and 2, which will stop happening eventually of course.EvilDragon wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 10:24 pmNKS1 implementation is entirely separate to NKS2. Both need to exist to have a proper fallback.machinesworking wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 9:51 pmIf a plugin developer codes NKS2 compatability into their plugin, will it work with "basic" NKS1 benefits on the older hardware, or is it incompatible? Are we looking at a backwards compatible new format for developers to code for or not? It sounds more and more like there will be great compromises since developers aren't required to write as much code, so older hardware will be asking for pixels that possibly will not be there.
Not me. I set that all up with an old Remote 61 and literally used it once. I don't think all the sliders and knobs in the world are going to make editing a plugin enjoyable. Just give me 8 knobs to use for performance parameters and I'm happy. If I want to edit a hardware synth, I'll use a hardware synth.rod_zero wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 10:02 pmWouldn't you like 8 faders for controlling envelopes, another 5 knobs for just the filter and 9 for the oscillators for controlling diva or hive?elxsound wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 9:45 pmI am so happy they didn’t. Nothing wrong with anyone wanting it, I just never use those faders and pads and prefer not seeing something that never gets use.
I just want a nice keybed, MIDI 2.0 and I’m looking forward to plugin integration with u-he.
I think 16 encoders and 8 buttons for parameter mapping (not including the 8 for other functions) would have been perfect. You'd actually get somewhere between 2-3x the controls at a time given that the encoders often get used for buttons. Whoever thought of the idea of having to have toggles be controlled by encoders rather than hardware buttons is absolutely out to lunch. And they have now created a new NKS2 standard, which will force both themselves and all the other developers to remake all their NKS presets (not a small amount of work!), and they didn't even bother to rectify this. Kinda unbelievable actually.rod_zero wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 9:58 pmI just wish for more encoders which make controlling their software synths more hands on.
Imagine something like 40 controls which allows a similar experience as the system 8 for the plug outs, but for NI and NKS synths.
Begrudgingly, I agree. Already preordered.zerocrossing wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 11:38 pm As far as I'm concerned, all's forgiven NI. You're back!![]()
Anyone want to buy a lightly used Hydrasynth Deluxe?![]()
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026