Where is Cubase 12.5 or 13? [Update: It's here C13 is released!]
-
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 25 Jan, 2007
Nothing in the feature list that seems very useful to me - GUI I don't much care one way or the other.
Cubase 12 hasn't been very stable for me, and the performance isn't good even with ASIO Guard (still only about half as efficient as VE Pro or Reaper). That's overwhelmingly my biggest disappointment - no sign of any progress on the audio engine.
Cubase 12 hasn't been very stable for me, and the performance isn't good even with ASIO Guard (still only about half as efficient as VE Pro or Reaper). That's overwhelmingly my biggest disappointment - no sign of any progress on the audio engine.
http://www.guyrowland.co.uk
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15
-
- KVRAF
- 5152 posts since 13 Jul, 2004 from Earth
+1noiseboyuk wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 10:34 am Nothing in the feature list that seems very useful to me - GUI I don't much care one way or the other.
Cubase 12 hasn't been very stable for me, and the performance isn't good even with ASIO Guard (still only about half as efficient as VE Pro or Reaper). That's overwhelmingly my biggest disappointment - no sign of any progress on the audio engine.
-
- KVRAF
- 1767 posts since 20 Feb, 2003
You're not alone in that. Blue Cat's solution didn't fair much better here either. Though it obviously depends a lot on the plugins hosted, and results will vary hugely based on that.Sahul wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 6:59 amNever had much success while testing both DDMF plugins. For some reason, they refused to work correctly in my Windows 11 computer with Cubase 12.bysbox1 wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 5:27 am 2 other sleepers are DDMF Metaplugin and Superplugin. The great thing about both of those it they let you run any plugin in with oversampling.
But I don't consider any of the "host in a host" stuff (I've tried.. ) to be stable enough to use as anything more than a temporary work-around - at least with Cubase. YMMV.
-
- Pick Me Pick me!
- Topic Starter
- 10234 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from a state of confusion
I had an issue with recalling of settings using DDMF IIEQPro in Cubase many years ago. It's the only plugin I've ever seen do that. The developer worked with me briefly to try a different build or two but could never solve the issue and eventually just stopped helping.Sahul wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 6:59 amNever had much success while testing both DDMF plugins. For some reason, they refused to work correctly in my Windows 11 computer with Cubase 12. However, Kushview Element is the one I'd recommend at this point. It's currently being actively developed again after some months of pause, and it also features oversampling.bysbox1 wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 5:27 am 2 other sleepers are DDMF Metaplugin and Superplugin. The great thing about both of those it they let you run any plugin in with oversampling.
I moved on to Fabfilter ProQ and, in the years since then, have never had such an issue with it. Or really any other VST in Cubase.
-
- KVRAF
- 1767 posts since 20 Feb, 2003
Samenoiseboyuk wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 10:34 amCubase 12 hasn't been very stable for me, and the performance isn't good even with ASIO Guard (still only about half as efficient as VE Pro or Reaper). That's overwhelmingly my biggest disappointment - no sign of any progress on the audio engine.
Short of a small miracle I doubt the situation will improve for hardware other than newer configurations Steinberg are directly testing on. (How many of their support techs aren't using Apple laptops at this point?!)
It's hard not to get the impression they've been overwhelmed with Apple Silicon support, new CPU thread handling on Windows 11, and new copy protection, alongside the legacy code which already made things more difficult.
The bottom line is if they can't provide performance and, above all, stability, then even many longer term users will start looking elsewhere, just purely out of practical basic need.
-
- KVRAF
- 5510 posts since 6 May, 2002
C12 is the most feature rich DAW on the market. I see very little it can't accomplish.
Intel Core2 Quad CPU + 4 GIG RAM
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I think you can produce any kind of music with any DAW these days. The features they add are merely for comfort, and improving the workflow. But, nothing "necessary".
All rather arguments they sell you for upgrading.
-
- KVRAF
- 7095 posts since 22 Jan, 2005 from Sweden
Agree on that, many features are more likechk071 wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 1:48 pm
I think you can produce any kind of music with any DAW these days. The features they add are merely for comfort, and improving the workflow. But, nothing "necessary".
All rather arguments they sell you for upgrading.
- a solution looking for a need
Ran Cubase 2015 to 2018 and then dropped it.
- had serious issues with track templates of selected tracks
- they never fixed it
- some other strangeness was that every full hour of windows uptime audio engine restarted due to some event in computer, but only in Pro versions, Elements were fine as all other daws StudioOne, Reaper and Sonar.
But always felt it looked really good, with visibility and all.
- among the most professional looking IMO
Now this fashionable gui with dark on even darker just make my eyes squint to see anything.
-
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 25 Jan, 2007
Yup, this stuff is still a nightmare. One version fixes it, the next breaks it again. Disabling / saving / closing / opening / enabling a multi out instrument track still breaks stuff in 12.0.70.lfm wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 2:28 pm- had serious issues with track templates of selected tracks
- they never fixed it
I used to be beta tester, but I got too depressed.
http://www.guyrowland.co.uk
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15
-
- KVRAF
- 7095 posts since 22 Jan, 2005 from Sweden
Yes, I remember we both had posts in same thread on Steinberg forum over this as v10 came around and still there.noiseboyuk wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 2:32 pmYup, this stuff is still a nightmare. One version fixes it, the next breaks it again. Disabling / saving / closing / opening / enabling a multi out instrument track still breaks stuff in 12.0.70.lfm wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 2:28 pm- had serious issues with track templates of selected tracks
- they never fixed it
I used to be beta tester, but I got too depressed.
- so if there still, sad story
- KVRAF
- 9064 posts since 1 Aug, 2003
All I agreed to was this:Trensharo wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 4:07 am I am sure there are people who will like the old version better, as is usually the case. There always exists some contrarians that have to disagree with any change made in an application.
Objectively, the new version is clearly superior from both a usability and ergonomics standpoint.
You claim "objectivity" in what is obviously a subjective point (I was just sharing my 2 cents. From my perspective. For what it's worth.)
No need to call me a "contrarian" over that. You might as well stay civil.
You do seem to raise a few valid points about other aspects of the new GUI.
-
kenny saunders kenny saunders https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=441077
- KVRist
- 382 posts since 16 May, 2019
I wish they would have brought back loopmash officially.
FYI you can still use it if you copy over the 'LoopMash_x64.vst3', 'pulseOSC_x64.dll' but it still needs the dongle.
FYI you can still use it if you copy over the 'LoopMash_x64.vst3', 'pulseOSC_x64.dll' but it still needs the dongle.
If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding. HOW CAN YOU HAVE ANY PUDDING IF YOU DON'T EAT YER MEAT!?
- KVRAF
- 25010 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
According to your objective opinion, huh?Trensharo wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 4:07 am Objectively, the new version is clearly superior from both a usability and ergonomics standpoint.
-
AdvancedFollower AdvancedFollower https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=418780
- KVRian
- 1342 posts since 8 May, 2018 from Sweden
I don't think UI design is entirely subjective. It's not based on the whims of some designer (at least not in big projects like a major DAW), there's actual science involved like usability testing, heuristic evaluation, user research etc.
Take a single oscillator, producing a drone. Send it to the wave shaper, altering the tone.
This can be a triangle, Sawtooth or a square. Modulate the pulse width, nobody will care
This can be a triangle, Sawtooth or a square. Modulate the pulse width, nobody will care