Opinions about Renoise
-
- KVRist
- 284 posts since 31 Aug, 2020
As a Live user, I found out about Renoise recently, installed the demo and it was a pleasant surprise.
Things I like so far is how fast it is to create drum patterns, creative midi effects, and navigation in project is super fast and satisfying since there is no need to zoom and unzoom like on traditional DAWs. I was worried about the midi limitations of the grid system but also found this plugin called Reform which can trick around and quickly create arpeggios and other complex midi stuff. On another hand, I'm afraid things get messy when adding various "extra" samples and layering them between sections (if that's even possible)
I'm diving more into the program but interested what you guys think about the workflow, viability for modern projects compared to Live, and what are your favorite resources for learning or using it !
Cheers
Things I like so far is how fast it is to create drum patterns, creative midi effects, and navigation in project is super fast and satisfying since there is no need to zoom and unzoom like on traditional DAWs. I was worried about the midi limitations of the grid system but also found this plugin called Reform which can trick around and quickly create arpeggios and other complex midi stuff. On another hand, I'm afraid things get messy when adding various "extra" samples and layering them between sections (if that's even possible)
I'm diving more into the program but interested what you guys think about the workflow, viability for modern projects compared to Live, and what are your favorite resources for learning or using it !
Cheers
-
- KVRAF
- 2429 posts since 11 Jan, 2009 from Portland, OR, USA
The differences between creating 'modern projects' with a matrix-grid DAW like Ableton vs. a tracker-DAW like renoise will come entirely down to personal taste, workflow and preference. Nobody can tell you if YOU can make successful modern music in Renoise... just get to work and see what happens. If it fully clicks in, hooray. If it doesn't, back to Ableton...Bulbizarre wrote: Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:06 pm
I'm diving more into the program but interested what you guys think about the workflow, viability for modern projects compared to Live, and what are your favorite resources for learning or using it !
Cheers
The best resources are the official Renoise forum, and some of the many YT vids on using the program.
It's a wonderful program, albeit in recent years it has been very slow to develop. But the current state is very solid, stable, and excellent. But again, whether it's "viable" isn't some objective fact to be confirmed by groupthink here at KVR. It's personal. Will it work for you? Only one way to find out...
-
- KVRist
- 318 posts since 25 May, 2021
Its a great program there are things i like, like the really integrated sampler. However i returned to Bitwig. For audio recording renoise is really basic and limited.
- KVRAF
- 3688 posts since 21 Nov, 2015
Switched from Renoise to Ableton a few years ago; now somehow Bitwig kind of fills the Gap in between. I think its still useful for creating loops, maybe similar to the old MPC workflow and sequencer. I was actually using Renoise since Version 2.0 if I remember correctly.
You can be creative in any right place on Earth, and not only in the wealthiest cities. Bring the world feelings from everywhere, and not only feelings of capitalistic or jail environment.
― Aleksey Vaneev
https://linuxdaw.org
― Aleksey Vaneev
https://linuxdaw.org
- KVRian
- 1166 posts since 20 Oct, 2023
What do you mean by The Grid system?Bulbizarre wrote: Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:06 pm I was worried about the midi limitations of the grid system but also found this plugin called Reform which can trick around and quickly create arpeggios and other complex midi stuff.
Also do you have a link for this Reform plugin? I was unable to find it.
I'm not sure what you mean by this either. Are you talking about key zones or playing notes between notes in the tracker (which you can do by just increasing the line count of the pattern)?On another hand, I'm afraid things get messy when adding various "extra" samples and layering them between sections (if that's even possible)
For a few years I attempted to get a good workflow going using Live to do realtime "on the fly" performances.I'm diving more into the program but interested what you guys think about the workflow, viability for modern projects compared to Live,
I won't bore you with the details, let's just say I've tried just about everything and was never 100% satisfied.
Had someone told me what I was looking for was a tracker program named Renoise, a pie would have been slapped on their face.
Yet, Renoise was indeed what I was looking for.
It truly is personal workflow preferences along with what style of music one wants to do.
Anyhow, Renoise is perfect for spontaneous on the fly performances.
The great thing about it is I could do it all with a sturdy QWERTY keyboard and needn't bother with anything else.
Another huge plus is I don't need VST instruments for the performances being that Renoise has a plugin grabber.
Sure it can be done with Live as well but there's something more compact with Renoise that simplifies things.
No doubt Live has a dynamite workflow. It's just one of those things where after messing around with a tracker, I cant stand piano rolls anymore (with the exception of standard recordings requiring piano etc. and orchestral type work).
I just plug and play. Thats the best way to go about it. When I have a question or get stumped I google and find (so far) that all are answered in the Renoise forums.and what are your favorite resources for learning or using it !
And I've had A LOT of questions. So far there was no need for forums posts as others have already gone through the challenges I faced.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 284 posts since 31 Aug, 2020
I found it from the official website https://www.renoise.com/tools/reformVOODOO U wrote: Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:54 pm What do you mean by The Grid system?
Also do you have a link for this Reform plugin? I was unable to find it.
The grid is to me just what the tracker interface looks like.
By "section", I meant what is actually called a pattern in Renoise. Let's say I have a long midi note playing a pad chord in pattern 1. Can the midi note extend through the next pattern or will it be "interrupted" as we're jumping on the next pattern; that was what I mentionnedI'm not sure what you mean by this either. Are you talking about key zones or playing notes between notes in the tracker (which you can do by just increasing the line count of the pattern)?
Anyways, thanks for the input !
- KVRian
- 1166 posts since 20 Oct, 2023
https://forum.renoise.com/t/continuous- ... note/27826Bulbizarre wrote: Sat Nov 11, 2023 10:12 pm By "section", I meant what is actually called a pattern in Renoise. Let's say I have a long midi note playing a pad chord in pattern 1. Can the midi note extend through the next pattern or will it be "interrupted" as we're jumping on the next pattern; that was what I mentionned
Thanka for the link to Reform. Looks like a good addenda.
-
- KVRist
- 133 posts since 19 Jan, 2003
They say Renoise is a DAW, but it's actually more like a creative semi-modular sampler with sequencer and plugin support. For me it's the most fun I can have making music with a computer, but, depending on a genre, you might miss some features from typical DAWs, like audio tracks, linear arranger and live features a-la Ableton.
Yeah it was a bit slow to develop lately in terms of new features, because developer focused more on getting it modern "under the hood" with VST3, hi-dpi and native apple silicon support. It got it even before some bigger DAWs, not to mention it now runs even on Raspberry pi, besides Windows, Mac and Linux. I think this is more important that new features, but now that it "got there", I think next version might be again more feature oriented. At least I hope so
Yeah it was a bit slow to develop lately in terms of new features, because developer focused more on getting it modern "under the hood" with VST3, hi-dpi and native apple silicon support. It got it even before some bigger DAWs, not to mention it now runs even on Raspberry pi, besides Windows, Mac and Linux. I think this is more important that new features, but now that it "got there", I think next version might be again more feature oriented. At least I hope so
-
- KVRian
- 1404 posts since 17 Oct, 2018
If you want the best of both worlds get Redux instead so you can use Renoise inside of Live. I really like the Redux plugin.Bulbizarre wrote: Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:06 pm As a Live user, I found out about Renoise recently, installed the demo and it was a pleasant surprise.
Things I like so far is how fast it is to create drum patterns, creative midi effects, and navigation in project is super fast and satisfying since there is no need to zoom and unzoom like on traditional DAWs. I was worried about the midi limitations of the grid system but also found this plugin called Reform which can trick around and quickly create arpeggios and other complex midi stuff. On another hand, I'm afraid things get messy when adding various "extra" samples and layering them between sections (if that's even possible)
I'm diving more into the program but interested what you guys think about the workflow, viability for modern projects compared to Live, and what are your favorite resources for learning or using it !
Cheers
Studio One // Bitwig // Logic Pro // Ableton // Reason // FLStudio // MPC // Force // Maschine
-
- KVRAF
- 5144 posts since 3 Oct, 2013
My problem was with the automation that runs across multiple patterns, like risers; uplifters, downlifters, those are only awkwardly manageable, need extensions >> found a forum entry about this: https://forum.renoise.com/t/automation- ... erns/69463
but can see Ableton Link support in the latest release so https://forum.renoise.com/t/renoise-3-4 ... ased/66685 can work parallel with AL
but can see Ableton Link support in the latest release so https://forum.renoise.com/t/renoise-3-4 ... ased/66685 can work parallel with AL
"Where we're workarounding, we don't NEED features." - powermat
-
spoontechnique spoontechnique https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=418750
- KVRist
- 492 posts since 7 May, 2018
You have to adapt to Renoise and start thinking in a Renoise way.
Renoise is amazing for rhythmic music, since you can change tempo and meter so easily. Having multiple tempos in a pattern is a piece of cake.
In other DAWs, I miss Renoise's pattern sequencer the most. Trying different song structures on the fly is easy in Renoise and hard in most other DAWs.
Renoise is amazing for rhythmic music, since you can change tempo and meter so easily. Having multiple tempos in a pattern is a piece of cake.
In other DAWs, I miss Renoise's pattern sequencer the most. Trying different song structures on the fly is easy in Renoise and hard in most other DAWs.
Linux version?
- KVRian
- 1166 posts since 20 Oct, 2023
It actually wouldn't be Renoise inside live. The obvious would be no pattern matrix and the other would be capabilities of the pattern editor that are unavailable in the phrase editor which Redux uses. Makes sense from a business standpoint.apoclypse wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 3:20 am If you want the best of both worlds get Redux instead so you can use Renoise inside of Live. I really like the Redux plugin.
Unless a Live user wants the workflow of a tracker there really isn't much need for Renoise or Redux since Live, coupled with Max, could do everything Renoise does.
On another note, I really don't see the purpose of the phrase editor. I've watched vids of users utilizing it and didn't see anything worth diving into. Renoise itself should just be made available as a VST/CLAP plugin that way we can have multiple instances of the full program as oppsed to a stripped down version.
-
- KVRAF
- 2429 posts since 11 Jan, 2009 from Portland, OR, USA
Ableton and Bitwig's matrix grids do everything renoise pattern sequencer does, and far more (see below)...so I strongly disagree with this statement.spoontechnique wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 8:12 am In other DAWs, I miss Renoise's pattern sequencer the most. Trying different song structures on the fly is easy in Renoise and hard in most other DAWs.
It's great that renoise has the pattern sequencer, sure, but it's got nothing on the scene based clip-launchers of Ableton and Bitwig, and is far less powerful. In those, you can have different length clips all looping together in a single scene. in Renoise, every track is forced to have the exact same length within the current pattern, which means in the pattern sequencer, you can only arrange 'sequences' in which the content of every track is exactly the same length. Which, for someone coming from the grid workflow of Ableton, is a massive, massive limitation -- and why I strongly disagree with your assertion above. If you're just comparing to Cubase, Studio One, etc. then sure; but compared to Live / Bitwig, the Renoise pattern sequencer alone offers little to nothing.
I tried to type in an illustration of what I mean but the text editor undoes all my formatting, I'll share it as an image below...
obviously the number of bars is arbitrary, but the point is that in the renoise sequence, every track is locked to a single length for the given pattern, whereas in the grid matrix of the other two, every track can be looping a clip of a different total length per scene -- absolutely common, everyday behavior for using these kind of sequencers, e.g. having shorter drum loops playing along with much longer synth passages, etc.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- KVRian
- 1166 posts since 20 Oct, 2023
Its a bit more work but you could just copy and paste pattern blocks on the tracks you want to repeat certain notes.
Say in Live if you got one clip looping 2 bars and another looping 8 bars, all you're doing is repeating specific notes/portion of an audio file.
So just copy/paste to accomodate the length of the pattern.
Again, it's more work but it can be done.
Say in Live if you got one clip looping 2 bars and another looping 8 bars, all you're doing is repeating specific notes/portion of an audio file.
So just copy/paste to accomodate the length of the pattern.
Again, it's more work but it can be done.
-
- KVRAF
- 2429 posts since 11 Jan, 2009 from Portland, OR, USA
That's not even close to the same, since the whole point of Live working this way is that while a scene and its (varied length) loops are playing back, you can record a new clip into the scene, of an arbitrary length. You're not constrained by the length of any one of the clips in the scene, because they are all looping, regardless of their length. Your workaround requires deciding in advance exactly how long you want everything to be, copy+pasting all tracks shorter than that value up to that max length, then recording a new part, which is of course constrained to that max length ...and thereby failing entirely to recreate the behavior of the Live scene.VOODOO U wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 7:15 pm Its a bit more work but you could just copy and paste pattern blocks on the tracks you want to repeat certain notes.
Say in Live if you got one clip looping 2 bars and another looping 8 bars, all you're doing is repeating specific notes/portion of an audio file.
So just copy/paste to accomodate the length of the pattern.
Again, it's more work but it can be done.
Whereas the whole point of Live's behavior is that 'max length' for the new clip is arbitrary: you can record a new clip into a scene and play for as long as you want, stopping any time, and it all fits together when you hit stop: the new clip could be shorter, equal to, or longer than the longest clip in the scene -- you don't have to decide in advance. Your workaround does not recreate this, it's just a lot of manual copy+pasting to create a predetermined total length.
I love Renoise, it's a fantastic program, but suggesting that this workaround makes the pattern sequencer the same (re: "it can be done") as how Live / Bitwig behavior behave is disingenuous. It's a totally different, and far more constrained, matrix workflow.