Motorola DSP563xx Emulator (BETA) (Access Virus, Nord Lead, Waldorf MW...)
RELATED
PRODUCTS DSP56300 Emulator JE8086 Nodal Red 2x Osirus OsTIrus Retromulator$29.00Buy Vavra Xenia
PRODUCTS DSP56300 Emulator JE8086 Nodal Red 2x Osirus OsTIrus Retromulator$29.00Buy Vavra Xenia
- KVRAF
- 7660 posts since 2 Sep, 2019
Ghostwave, I thought the emulator itself is totally legal and requires no permission from anyone. It seems like you’re correct about the first part, that it just started out as an experiment to see if they could do it.
But now it looks like focus has shifted to how they can best monetize it, whether it’s getting picked up by Access or squeezing donations out of it. And that’s really what the rest of the weirdness has been about: Not a fear of getting shut down so much as a fear of getting shut out.
But now it looks like focus has shifted to how they can best monetize it, whether it’s getting picked up by Access or squeezing donations out of it. And that’s really what the rest of the weirdness has been about: Not a fear of getting shut down so much as a fear of getting shut out.
THIS MUSIC HAS BEEN MIXED TO BE PLAYED LOUD SO TURN IT UP
-
- KVRian
- 750 posts since 9 Mar, 2001
What the hell do you think Discord is?jamcat wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 6:05 am OK, but why is everyone involved with this so cagey about it? And why is it supposedly free, but you have to join some secret Discord channel to get it, and "donate" money to get the latest version? It all seems to operate like a Russian server.
I mean, come on. Nothing about this is normal.
Using Community based platforms during development means closer relations to users, better and more bug reporting etc etc. Better and faster interaction between both users<->users and users<->devs.
Ever heard of Teams? Slack? Discord is the secret shady ip-logging russian and north korean version of those...servers..
- KVRAF
- 7660 posts since 2 Sep, 2019
The reinvention of IRC (which was the reinvention of BBS.)
THIS MUSIC HAS BEEN MIXED TO BE PLAYED LOUD SO TURN IT UP
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Unfortunately, there only had been the initial beta of the Virus TI emulation. It has quite a few bugs, which weren't fixed until now.cnt wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 8:53 amWhat the hell do you think Discord is?jamcat wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 6:05 am OK, but why is everyone involved with this so cagey about it? And why is it supposedly free, but you have to join some secret Discord channel to get it, and "donate" money to get the latest version? It all seems to operate like a Russian server.
I mean, come on. Nothing about this is normal.![]()
Using Community based platforms during development means closer relations to users, better and more bug reporting etc etc. Better and faster interaction between both users<->users and users<->devs.
It's like their microQ emulation. There were a few minor updates in the beginning, and, after that, more or less radio silence. Last version is almost a year old. It also has a few long standing bugs.
I really like what they do, but, they should rather concentrate on polishing than on new releases.
-
- KVRAF
- 5156 posts since 13 Jul, 2004 from Earth
It is shady because it is Piracyjamcat wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 6:05 am OK, but why is everyone involved with this so cagey about it? And why is it supposedly free, but you have to join some secret Discord channel to get it, and "donate" money to get the latest version? It all seems to operate like a Russian server.
I mean, come on. Nothing about this is normal.
When you donate to a project like this you donate to a pirate group.
It would be a different story if the companies that made those Synth where Ok with this Project but they are not.
The Thread on Gearspace got shut down in 2022 for Review and has not been opened again for a Reason.
Last edited by D-Fusion on Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 1769 posts since 1 Mar, 2010 from Paris
This is definitely not the tone I get from the discussions on Discord. Some of the stuff they are working on will benefit all emulators, not just the Virus TI one. They're ambitious and ambition takes time.jamcat wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 8:38 am But now it looks like focus has shifted to how they can best monetize it, whether it’s getting picked up by Access or squeezing donations out of it. And that’s really what the rest of the weirdness has been about: Not a fear of getting shut down so much as a fear of getting shut out.
-
- KVRian
- 1105 posts since 11 Dec, 2020
D-Fusion wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:25 amIt is shady because it is Piracyjamcat wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 6:05 am OK, but why is everyone involved with this so cagey about it? And why is it supposedly free, but you have to join some secret Discord channel to get it, and "donate" money to get the latest version? It all seems to operate like a Russian server.
I mean, come on. Nothing about this is normal.
When you donate to a project like this you donate to a pirate group.
There is no piracy, they are not emulating the Virus, only the DSP
-
- KVRAF
- 5156 posts since 13 Jul, 2004 from Earth
Wrong.Gam456 wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:28 amD-Fusion wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:25 amIt is shady because it is Piracyjamcat wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 6:05 am OK, but why is everyone involved with this so cagey about it? And why is it supposedly free, but you have to join some secret Discord channel to get it, and "donate" money to get the latest version? It all seems to operate like a Russian server.
I mean, come on. Nothing about this is normal.
When you donate to a project like this you donate to a pirate group.
There is no piracy, they are not emulating the Virus, only the DSP
It is no different than downloading a Keygen for a product to unlock it except on this Project The Emulator is the Keygen and the Rom is the product you use to unlock the Virus inside the program.
Are Keygens ok since you have to find the vst for it by yourself and the Keygen doesn't Emulate the Product?
- KVRAF
- 37389 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Well I paid for my Virus Ti but since Access no longer support it this is probably my only option to run it on M1 Mac
-
- KVRian
- 1105 posts since 11 Dec, 2020
NoD-Fusion wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:49 amWrong.Gam456 wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:28 amD-Fusion wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:25 amIt is shady because it is Piracyjamcat wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 6:05 am OK, but why is everyone involved with this so cagey about it? And why is it supposedly free, but you have to join some secret Discord channel to get it, and "donate" money to get the latest version? It all seems to operate like a Russian server.
I mean, come on. Nothing about this is normal.
When you donate to a project like this you donate to a pirate group.
There is no piracy, they are not emulating the Virus, only the DSP
It is no different than downloading a Keygen for a product to unlock it except on this Project The Emulator is the Keygen and the Rom is the product you use to unlock the Virus inside the program.
Are Keygens ok since you have to find the vst for it by yourself and the Keygen doesn't Emulate the Product?
Most of piracy altering the software, or emulate an anti piracy system, to be able to use a keygen. Many of them don't even require anything, just and installer. The software is already hack.
OsTirus. They only emulate the DSP hardware, they don't provide the OS or any links. They are not even altering the OS. There is no hack at all.
-
- KVRAF
- 2313 posts since 24 Jun, 2006 from London, England
Yeah, it's the exactly same as things like MAME which has happily been going for over 25 years ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAME#:~:t ... %5Bedit%5D ) - None of the copyrighted compiled source files (i.e. roms) are included with the application - It's the onus of the end user to either legally (or illegally!) source/extract this content
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
If you can run it. The CPU requirements are brutal.aMUSEd wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:52 am Well I paid for my Virus Ti but since Access no longer support it this is probably my only option to run it on M1 Mac
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Frankly, with all the reverse engineering they did, it's surely at least "grey zone".Gam456 wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:28 amD-Fusion wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:25 amIt is shady because it is Piracyjamcat wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 6:05 am OK, but why is everyone involved with this so cagey about it? And why is it supposedly free, but you have to join some secret Discord channel to get it, and "donate" money to get the latest version? It all seems to operate like a Russian server.
I mean, come on. Nothing about this is normal.
When you donate to a project like this you donate to a pirate group.
There is no piracy, they are not emulating the Virus, only the DSP
Anyway, there were enough discussions about this. And, they also got in contact with Waldorf, and asked if they want to cooperate, which would have helped massively with performance, as far as I understood, but, Waldorf said no, because the emulator used to much CPU. Which is kind of understandable, considering people will always compare it to how soft synths run.
-
gaggle of hermits gaggle of hermits https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=521655
- KVRian
- 965 posts since 18 Jul, 2021
under the dmca in the US at least, reverse engineering for the purpose of interoperability (ie getting something to run on a machine you have when the vendor doesn't support it) is fine.
see also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Comp ... ectix_Corp.
upshot: the court determined that the emulator was "transformative" enough to not be an issue to Sony. as this is a software emulation of hardware products, I'd expect the results to be more or less the same.
it's a bit fuzzier in the EU as there is a provision in the 1991 directive but not to share information derived from the reverse engineering. whether releasing an emulator constitutes "sharing information" is an exercise for the reader.
but, seriously, though Roland probably would if it were them, would access sue over products that are basically now discontinued and the founder is off making guitar amp simulators? that would be kinda ironic.
see also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Comp ... ectix_Corp.
upshot: the court determined that the emulator was "transformative" enough to not be an issue to Sony. as this is a software emulation of hardware products, I'd expect the results to be more or less the same.
it's a bit fuzzier in the EU as there is a provision in the 1991 directive but not to share information derived from the reverse engineering. whether releasing an emulator constitutes "sharing information" is an exercise for the reader.
but, seriously, though Roland probably would if it were them, would access sue over products that are basically now discontinued and the founder is off making guitar amp simulators? that would be kinda ironic.
