I want to use only one synth
- KVRAF
- 7001 posts since 20 Mar, 2012 from Babbleon
any way is okay
but it's really not just the synth
it's how good the music is
but "good" is subjective
but it's really not just the synth
it's how good the music is
but "good" is subjective
ah böwakawa poussé poussé
-
Scrubbing Monkeys Scrubbing Monkeys https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=397259
- KVRAF
- 1837 posts since 21 Apr, 2017 from Bahia, Brazil
For myself and music I create.....I would say Spire. Quick to get the sound I want and sounds great. But for those time where I dont mind spending hrs creating a patch and want something different Bazille.
We jumped the fence because it was a fence not be cause the grass was greener.
https://scrubbingmonkeys.bandcamp.com/
https://sites.google.com/view/scrubbing-monkeys
https://scrubbingmonkeys.bandcamp.com/
https://sites.google.com/view/scrubbing-monkeys
-
- KVRist
- 80 posts since 19 Oct, 2023
You could also use no synths at all, just samplers.ghostwhistler wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:35 pm More and more, as I write and learn the software synths I use (I will never own the hardware so who cares anyway), I find that i just want to work with as few synths as possible. Maybe even just one, percussion sounds aside.
- KVRAF
- 18395 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
Yesterday I authored a sound that took me 3 different synth plugins to get, so I can’t even use one plugin for a single sound. 
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
- KVRAF
- 20739 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
Yes, exactly. So much great music has been made this way.
- KVRAF
- 7060 posts since 19 Apr, 2002 from Utah
I could get along great with nothing more than a good quality sampler, and a healthy variety of good quality effects. The problem is that there are very few good quality samplers available these days.
Vendor‑Dependent Copy Protection: Customers lose. Pirates win.
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
-
- KVRAF
- 5573 posts since 30 May, 2006 from Hollow Earth
^^^TAL-Sampler
ABEFLGMOPPRRST 
- KVRAF
- 7060 posts since 19 Apr, 2002 from Utah
I’ve got it!
Vendor‑Dependent Copy Protection: Customers lose. Pirates win.
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
-
- KVRAF
- 5573 posts since 30 May, 2006 from Hollow Earth
Linear mode?audiojunkie wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 2:07 amI’ve got it!The problem with TAL-Sampler is that its aim is for recreating old samplers. I like that, but I also want a high quality mode with an ultra-high quality pitch transposition interpolation. That is my biggest wish for it.
ABEFLGMOPPRRST 
- KVRAF
- 20739 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
- KVRAF
- 7060 posts since 19 Apr, 2002 from Utah
No. Linear mode is the lowest interpolation quality of all available modes in Tal-Sampler. The highest quality interpolation mode is S1000, which only uses 8-bit sinc interpolation. I’d like to see an ultra high quality mode, for example 128 bit sinc interpolation and auto formant management. That rate used to be reserved for off line conversions, but computers these days should be able to handle this high of quality without too much effort. Imagine loading a single sample on c3 and being able to play it for three or more octaves without it sounding like garbage or with chipmunkization. If that doesn’t bring the fun and immediacy back into sampling, I don’t know what would.liquidsound wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 2:36 amLinear mode?audiojunkie wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 2:07 amI’ve got it!The problem with TAL-Sampler is that its aim is for recreating old samplers. I like that, but I also want a high quality mode with an ultra-high quality pitch transposition interpolation. That is my biggest wish for it.
Vendor‑Dependent Copy Protection: Customers lose. Pirates win.
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
-
- KVRAF
- 5573 posts since 30 May, 2006 from Hollow Earth
Got it! I thought Linear didn't use any filtering and it was going to be the less intrusive but I'm reading the manual on the "Variable" modes.audiojunkie wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 4:32 amNo. Linear mode is the lowest interpolation quality of all available modes in Tal-Sampler. The highest quality interpolation mode is S1000, which only uses 8-bit sinc interpolation. I’d like to see an ultra high quality mode, for example 128 bit sinc interpolation and auto formant management. That rate used to be reserved for off line conversions, but computers these days should be able to handle this high of quality without too much effort. Imagine loading a single sample on c3 and being able to play it for three or more octaves without it sounding like garbage or with chipmunkization. If that doesn’t bring the fun and immediacy back into sampling, I don’t know what would.liquidsound wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 2:36 amLinear mode?audiojunkie wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 2:07 amI’ve got it!The problem with TAL-Sampler is that its aim is for recreating old samplers. I like that, but I also want a high quality mode with an ultra-high quality pitch transposition interpolation. That is my biggest wish for it.
![]()
Is the S1000 better than the Clean?
I just bought the Sampler and I'm planning to use it a lot with Reaper (my latest move
ABEFLGMOPPRRST 
- KVRAF
- 4066 posts since 3 Jul, 2022
Damn!liquidsound wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 4:56 am ...... I'm planning to use it a lot with Reaper (my latest move)
You were serious!
Why not trying Bitwig? Cost?
By the way, Bitwig sampler is the funniest of my toys.
-
- KVRAF
- 5573 posts since 30 May, 2006 from Hollow Earth
Try?Jac459 wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:14 amDamn!liquidsound wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 4:56 am ...... I'm planning to use it a lot with Reaper (my latest move)
You were serious!
Why not trying Bitwig? Cost?
By the way, Bitwig sampler is the funniest of my toys.
I used Reaper here and there since v3.x ( 3 again
I even stop using Ableton!
I discovered some amazing additional tools (Free) that are really good but I was not aware of.
From Sample/Slicer on steroids to Drum-Racks and MIDI Generator to the Paranormal FX Router > (Ableton and BWS should make one) etc.
Super stable and the CPU usage is like "Occult" stuff
Yes. Very serious (like Venus Theory I guess
ABEFLGMOPPRRST 
-
- Banned
- 31 posts since 22 Jun, 2023
Falcon or Reaktor