Yes but he was doing me a favor and it provided me with the information I was looking for.jens wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 9:01 am I think it would make VASTLY more sense to replace the plugin in question and strieve to get an even better result with it.
Pulsar Modular P450/P455 MDN Plugin Bundle
- KVRAF
- 20789 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
-
- KVRist
- 289 posts since 4 Dec, 2003 from Oregon, USA
Dude, you should put together a documentary of the insidious inner workings of Pulsar Modular. Throw it on Netflix and blow the doors off the entire audio industry.stillenacht wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 5:15 pmMost indie devs are happy to talk about what they are doing, what they don't give away is there internal tweaks and mods, there's not much point being shy about basic techniques as there is only a limited number anyway. You can argue that all devs take stuff but if they are found out they also get posted about, especially when it affects what the the plugin is meant to be doing.GusGranite wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 5:00 pm I don't understand why you are demanding to know the internal workings of Pulsar Modular's development process? That seems unreasonable to me.
I have worked closely with developers for all of my professional career. They all come at it from different angles. Some re-use libraries and frameworks from many many sources, others pride themselves on developing from scratch. Some have more of the vision and less of the pure coding, some are stronger on the design and UX. Some are really great business analysts and excel at communicating with the customer or other teams even if their coding is a bit weaker.
You are using scraps of publicly available information to piece together the internal workings of the Pulsar Modular business team without knowing what other conversations have taken place, who else is on the team, etc.
I don't understand why you would want to do this? I don't know this information about any other development team unless I work directly with them. It just seems really negative and obsessive to me.
- KVRAF
- 20789 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
The rest of the world would think it's a mockumentary. "These plugins go to 11"
-
- KVRist
- 400 posts since 22 Mar, 2006 from Netherlands
P11Uncle E wrote: Sun Mar 03, 2024 12:05 am The rest of the world would think it's a mockumentary. "These plugins go to 11"
-
- KVRist
- 239 posts since 21 Apr, 2010
There already is one.idoru97214 wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 11:58 pmDude, you should put together a documentary of the insidious inner workings of Pulsar Modular. Throw it on Netflix and blow the doors off the entire audio industry.
And it already won the M.E. award (it's like Emmy award, only here it for Mastering Endeavors).
I have seen a Stockumentry about Cubase's stock plugins, BTW.
Back to topic :
Is the Box actually 1/2 of a 1608 ?
-
- KVRer
- 14 posts since 21 Feb, 2024
To be fair this is one of the bits that was throwing me as it doesn't make sense, I guess what you are saying is that you don't use other peoples prefabricated JUCE modules but the plugins are JUCE DSP plus at a guess your variant on dynamic distortion. The confusion is that JUCE DSP is itself prefabricated that is not original. Its because people don't know whats in the plugins the GS threads have been going on over 100 pages over a misunderstanding and the sound of JUCE filters.P900 wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:47 pm We do not recycle JUCE DSP modules (which ends up everyone sounding the same, except the GUI is different).
The above statement means we do use JUCE and it means we wrote our own unique routines for the P42 saturation.
I don't think it was unreasonable to ask basic information about a $340 plugin (P440) as you don't buy a synth without knowing what type of synthesis its using. I'm also guessing nobody has pointed out when you buy IP its only for original work, it doesn't cover public domain or stuff used under open source license.
- KVRAF
- 1843 posts since 3 Jan, 2019 from Holland
Demoed. Nothing special. One-trick pony, narrow sweetspot, thins out most sources. Compressor useless, eq sounds nothing like API (not like my hardware at least).
Overhyped. Overpriced.
Hard pass.
Overhyped. Overpriced.
Hard pass.
The loudness war is over, loudness has won
- KVRAF
- 11375 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
Well well well.. what have we got here? Hyperbolic language! Could it be truth, or could the motivation be some much needed anti-hype?dionenoid wrote: Sun Mar 03, 2024 2:54 pm Demoed. Nothing special. One-trick pony, narrow sweetspot, thins out most sources. Compressor useless, eq sounds nothing like API (not like my hardware at least).
Overhyped. Overpriced.
Hard pass.
So, as so many here have asked for "proof" in form of audio examples when there is hyperbolic language used (which I did and literally nobody commented on them or even tried to match the results with any other plugins or hardware) may we have some examples of the compressor being totally useless and how the plugin is only a one-trick pony and has a narrow sweetspot? Please also make sure you post the raw audio files so we can compare to make it fair (like I did).
As for the EQ sounding nothing like API, that I can agree with.. sort of, if your unit in question is the 5500 or any of the recent lunchbox revisions (so less than 15 years old give or take).
EDIT: In case it wasn't clear, I was sort of joking. No need to provide any audio clips, unless you want to of course. I just think it would be cool if we demanded equal rights for hyperbolic language. If you say something is basically useless and very bad, can you show it? Though I'm sure the mob is happy to leave it at words only when it suits them.
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
- KVRist
- 161 posts since 31 Aug, 2020
Could someone kindly elaborate on the unique functionalities offered by the P450/P455 effects plugin and why it's supposedly considered indispensable despite its premium price? Asking for a friend from the musical college.
P.S. I'm skeptical that users should be required to provide evidence to justify their decision not to purchase (also, please take note of the upvote ratio on @dionenoid’s comment above, especially when joking while being in conflict of interests.), rather than developers substantiating the value of their plugin beyond mere claims. So far, the demos I've encountered haven't convinced me, for example, to give this effects plugin a try, let alone consider adding it to my meticulously curated list of plugins.
P.S. I'm skeptical that users should be required to provide evidence to justify their decision not to purchase (also, please take note of the upvote ratio on @dionenoid’s comment above, especially when joking while being in conflict of interests.), rather than developers substantiating the value of their plugin beyond mere claims. So far, the demos I've encountered haven't convinced me, for example, to give this effects plugin a try, let alone consider adding it to my meticulously curated list of plugins.
Monitors: HS7 / Mixing: Cubase Pro 13 / Mastering: WaveLab Pro 11.2 / Sound Design: Live 12 Suite
- KVRAF
- 25030 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
I have to try it with different material (only tested on the drum-bus so far) but tbh I have to pretty much agree with dioneoid's assessment so far. I didn't manange to come up with a setting where it didn't sound much better (opening up, kind of as if I lifted a veil and removed a rigid clamp) whenever I switched the compressor off.bmanic wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:26 amWell well well.. what have we got here? Hyperbolic language! Could it be truth, or could the motivation be some much needed anti-hype?dionenoid wrote: Sun Mar 03, 2024 2:54 pm Demoed. Nothing special. One-trick pony, narrow sweetspot, thins out most sources. Compressor useless, eq sounds nothing like API (not like my hardware at least).
Overhyped. Overpriced.
Hard pass.
So, as so many here have asked for "proof" in form of audio examples when there is hyperbolic language used (which I did and literally nobody commented on them or even tried to match the results with any other plugins or hardware) may we have some examples of the compressor being totally useless and how the plugin is only a one-trick pony and has a narrow sweetspot? Please also make sure you post the raw audio files so we can compare to make it fair (like I did).
(Something I very rarely experience normally; these days there's imo very few really bad-sounding compressors and (at least in my use case) this is one of them.)
Disclaimer: Of course I don't consider my verdict to be universally valid. I rather assume the compressor's possible sweet-spot is so narrow and so specifc that it only applies under certain conditions which I did not meet.
- KVRAF
- 20789 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
Did you listen to the three versions that bmanic posted? That convinced me to at least download the demo.equisonus wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 6:55 am So far, the demos I've encountered haven't convinced me, for example, to give this effects plugin a try, let alone consider adding it to my meticulously curated list of plugins.
- KVRist
- 161 posts since 31 Aug, 2020
Why is it “pointless”. Congratulations on your 11 months old, 1st post profile on KVR
Monitors: HS7 / Mixing: Cubase Pro 13 / Mastering: WaveLab Pro 11.2 / Sound Design: Live 12 Suite
