Charlatan³ Free VA synth updated to v3.3.2 (Win/Linux)

[Nug Wrangler]

Loopable MSEGs next?

I just asked about it last week lol.

Yes i know

[wikter]

Loopable MSEGs next?

I just asked about it last week lol.

Have you used XLFO instead?

[Korg Supporter]

Loopable MSEGs next?

I just asked about it last week lol.

Have you used XLFO instead?

Yes, but it just loops the entire waveform, and the amplifier cannot be modulated by the XLFO. I want something like the Casio CZ multi-stage envelopes.

[wikter]

the amplifier cannot be modulated by the XLFO.

Yes, it is. And you can modulate the Envelope amount or the LFO intensity.
You can also use XForm to introduce delay/lag

[Korg Supporter]

the amplifier cannot be modulated by the XLFO.

Yes, it is. And you can modulate the Envelope amount or the LFO intensity.
You can also use XForm to introduce delay/lag

I meant master volume, but ok!

[Nug Wrangler]

the amplifier cannot be modulated by the XLFO.

Yes, it is. And you can modulate the Envelope amount or the LFO intensity.
You can also use XForm to introduce delay/lag

Thanks for the tip

[Nug Wrangler]

I would love to name the macros

[wikter]

the amplifier cannot be modulated by the XLFO.

Yes, it is. And you can modulate the Envelope amount or the LFO intensity.
You can also use XForm to introduce delay/lag

I meant master volume, but ok!

The master volume is modulated on the first envelope AMP, it is "hardwired" to the main Volume. It's the value that you can assign velocity or keytrack to control main level.

[brok landers]

Dominik,
there's still a bug in the xlfo. it still is mono with each note-on globally when the mono switch is off and set to free phase. If the mono switch is off it should behave like the normal lfo - it should retrigger with random phase per voice when set to free phase.
can you confirm?

[karrikuh]

Dominik,
there's still a bug in the xlfo. it still is mono with each note-on globally when the mono switch is off and set to free phase. If the mono switch is off it should behave like the normal lfo - it should retrigger with random phase per voice when set to free phase.
can you confirm?

Right, this is a known limitation. XLFOs don't support polyphony currently. You can achieve the same effect by feeding a regular polyphonic LFO with sawtooth shape into an XFORM. On the long term, I will probably add a proper polyphonic mode to the XLFO, too.

[brok landers]

Dominik,
there's still a bug in the xlfo. it still is mono with each note-on globally when the mono switch is off and set to free phase. If the mono switch is off it should behave like the normal lfo - it should retrigger with random phase per voice when set to free phase.
can you confirm?

Right, this is a known limitation. XLFOs don't support polyphony currently. You can achieve the same effect by feeding a regular polyphonic LFO with sawtooth shape into an XFORM. On the long term, I will probably add a proper polyphonic mode to the XLFO, too.

fair enough. patiently waiting. and pleeeeeease - double the possible voice count with the ability to set up the exact voice count in steps of 1. this thing does such great pads - 8 voices is just not enough för such.

[digitalboytn]

Dominik,
there's still a bug in the xlfo. it still is mono with each note-on globally when the mono switch is off and set to free phase. If the mono switch is off it should behave like the normal lfo - it should retrigger with random phase per voice when set to free phase.
can you confirm?

Right, this is a known limitation. XLFOs don't support polyphony currently. You can achieve the same effect by feeding a regular polyphonic LFO with sawtooth shape into an XFORM. On the long term, I will probably add a proper polyphonic mode to the XLFO, too.

fair enough. patiently waiting. and pleeeeeease - double the possible voice count with the ability to set up the exact voice count in steps of 1. this thing does such great pads - 8 voices is just not enough för such.

[gentleclockdivider]

I don't know how realistic this would be to implement given the curent architecture , but what about the ability to modulate osc1-2 against each other with the same modulation types found in the osc pairs
This would vastly expand the sound capabilities

[Korg Supporter]

I don't know how realistic this would be to implement given the curent architecture , but what about the ability to modulate osc1-2 against each other with the same modulation types found in the osc pairs
This would vastly expand the sound capabilities

Osc panning and unison would also be nice.

[wikter]

Osc panning and unison would also be nice.

Unison already there, since the very begginning (Already available with Charlatan V1 & V2).
Per Osc Pan would be great but that means Filter should be Stereo, or maybe solved with the option to route Osc to filter 1/2 and panning filters. Anyway, I'd prefer higher voice count rather than panning oscs independently.