One Synth Challenge #186: Any Two Synths Challenge (Viroo Wins!)

[loord]

Voted!

[Atomicco]

Sorry I didn't noticed that
Now everyone can download Thanks NeverBeenInARiot you noticed that

[AuderMarr]

Voted!

[liqih]

I can't vote because loading of each track stops at 75%, tried with two different browsers.

[empphryio]

Voted.
You can do as you like but it would be nice if you didn't compress your tracks down to -3 LUFS-I or -4 or -5, as three people did. FYI the average LUFS-I for the round was -12.1 and LUFS-S was -9.2 FYI. It can be painful to get hit with stuff from -3 to -5 when the volume is more set for listening at that much softer of a level.

[RichardSemper]

I can't vote because loading of each track stops at 75%, tried with two different browsers.

I cannot repeat this - is working fine for me in chrome.
Can you still move tracks to the bins even though loaded to only 75%?
Have you tried the radio voting style?

Has anyone else experienced this issue?

[doctorbob]

I can't vote because loading of each track stops at 75%, tried with two different browsers.

Try the radio button method?

If to no avail, send your votes to Richard via a PM and he will I am sure get your votes into the table and keep you from being a DQ!

dB

[ThePresent]

Voted

[liqih]

Today it's working again, it happened for the whole yesterday in both radio and other page.
The loading reached 75% and the pages frozen, very strange. But I rather blame soundcloud.com, it's not rare that some tracks refuse to stream even from their website.

I can't vote because loading of each track stops at 75%, tried with two different browsers.

I cannot repeat this - is working fine for me in chrome.
Can you still move tracks to the bins even though loaded to only 75%?
Have you tried the radio voting style?

Has anyone else experienced this issue?

[liqih]

Voted.
You can do as you like but it would be nice if you didn't compress your tracks down to -3 LUFS-I or -4 or -5, as three people did. FYI the average LUFS-I for the round was -12.1 and LUFS-S was -9.2 FYI. It can be painful to get hit with stuff from -3 to -5 when the volume is more set for listening at that much softer of a level.

For this month I referenced to a contemporary jazz record showing the average of -8 dB RMS, that should be about -12 integrated LUFS(?).
But I could not replicate the frequency bands that contributed the most to that, the record goes down very loud to 35 hz, and if I copied the same average spectrum slope my track would sound very boomy with no presence, so I EQed by ear also. Now that was wrong because it sounded good to my old ears, but now the average spectrum slope was unbalanced to the highs.

Another issue, beside my hearing loss, is that the harmonics generation from the synth I used (TripleCheese) could not compare to the electro-acoustic instruments I tries to emulate. I should have doubled the synth instances instead of pumping it with EQ.

[empphryio]

To be clear liqih, the above comment wasn't directed at you. Your track isn't painfully loud. On SC I was just wondering if for the type of track it is, it might work better a bit "softer". But I don't really know.

[liqih]

To be clear liqih, the above comment wasn't directed at you. Your track isn't painfully loud. On SC I was just wondering if for the type of track it is, it might work better a bit "softer". But I don't really know.

Yeah, I took your comment as chance to tell why I think I made a mix more wrong than usual.
So it's not a direct reply to you, sorry for the confusion. Cheers

[violator_alba]

Aaaand I'm done voting. Interesting to hear what everyone defaults to when given a choice! Another great round.

[MadMcMan]

voted

[VCA-089]

Voted!