It's been a while since I wrote that though. Nebula compression has come a very long way.. but having said that, it still has a lot of issues. Many of those can be avoided if the program has been sampled and "programmed" properly (Tim Petherick knows his stuff.. his compression programs are in my opinion the best by quite a margin).TheoM wrote:Hmm i read from bmanic that nebula compression just doesn't sound right, and to be honest, although we have our differences, he knows compression and i would tend to believe him pretty much above most others when it comes to that.
Quite a few programs still suffer from weird noises in the bass region or at harsh transients (kind of "chirp" noises) and some programs are just tonally completely off (for instance some AlexB libraries) as they seem to affect only a certain part of the frequency spectrum.
A lot of these not-properly-working programs can be tuned and tweaked by the user to some degree but ultimately I'd still categorize Nebula as a very niche, very secret weapon. It's used by a select few only and takes quite a bit of patience and understanding to work with. However, when it works, it's GLORIOUS and so far ahead of everything else that it isn't even funny.
Cheers!
bManic
