Yes, but the you need this additional track each time you record additional material and need to keep moving it to the stereo-track. And If you want to monitor-through the inserts, that of course needs significantly more ressources. Or you could record the mono-source to a stereo-track, but that would needlessly double-up the data. A third option would be to route to a bus.Uncle E wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2024 8:25 pmAh, got it. You're right, this needs to be fixed. The solution is to drag the audio to a stereo track after you've recorded but it shouldn't be necessary. Convert to Stereo only works when there are two separate tracks.jens wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2024 3:39 am Yes - putting stereo-fx on mono-sources - you know, wild crazy stuff such as putting a chorus on a guitar or a phaser on some bass-guitar or who knows, *gasp* maybe even inserting a reverb on a vocal-track or a rotary on an organ one - I know that's really way out there, but that's me - I always keep coming up with bizarre ideas like these.
But all these options are far from being ideal or even just reasonable, and yet the folks at UA seem to find their implementation completely normal and do not appear to see a problem at all. What is super-weird to me is that their argument seems to be that Luna follows more closely a traditional hardware-approach, but that is of course absolutely not the case. To me their channel-architecture seems to frankly indicate that they have a very limited understanding of the mechanics of music-production, be it analog or digital.
- the easiest and (by far) least expensive way would of course be via Dante Virtual Soundcard...
