Does anyone have one, and if so, what do you think of it? I'm thinking of it primarily for guitar, but the idea of plugging synths through it hasn't escaped me either
G.
Does anyone own an Adrenalinn 2?
-
- KVRist
- 346 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from Sydney, Ausralia
I've been "should I or shouldn't I" about this unit for some time. The audio/video demos look good, but then, that's rather the point, isn't it!
Does anyone have one, and if so, what do you think of it? I'm thinking of it primarily for guitar, but the idea of plugging synths through it hasn't escaped me either
G.
Does anyone have one, and if so, what do you think of it? I'm thinking of it primarily for guitar, but the idea of plugging synths through it hasn't escaped me either
G.
-
- KVRian
- 1460 posts since 26 Nov, 2002
I got one, you should too. It is the closest tool for giving the guitarists some of the filtering options that synths have. The amp modeling sounds good but not like a real amp I am sorry to say so if you wanted it for that a Pod is mucho better. It is also a great practise tool, there are drum patterns galore and the whole thing is very rythmic. I am glad I got it. 
-
Muzik 4 Machines Muzik 4 Machines https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=9550 - KVRAF
- 7829 posts since 6 Oct, 2003 from Quebec
for guitar i use a kaoss pad, digita l but damn effective
i play it with my foot
it sits between my fuzz and delay on my pedalboard
the adrenalinn was my second choice but the x-y pad of the kaoss get over the sequencer of the adrenalinn in my case
i use tube amps so no need for modelling
i play it with my foot
it sits between my fuzz and delay on my pedalboard
the adrenalinn was my second choice but the x-y pad of the kaoss get over the sequencer of the adrenalinn in my case
i use tube amps so no need for modelling
