87% of songs on streaming services don't qualify for royalties
-
- KVRian
- 1030 posts since 15 Feb, 2005
cause they don't meet minimum streams per month thresholds...this jumps to 95% when talking spotify alone
https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/ ... lays-each/
https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/ ... lays-each/
Music had a one night stand with sound design.....And the condom broke
- KVRAF
- 16806 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
So tons of music is produced which no one listens to.
1. That seems a lot of waste
2. Tell me something new
3. It's the same on Netflix, which is a bigger waste because production costs for video is bigger than audio
1. That seems a lot of waste
2. Tell me something new
3. It's the same on Netflix, which is a bigger waste because production costs for video is bigger than audio
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. 
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
- KVRAF
- 14145 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
True. One song I have have had 165 plays and got @40 cents. Another with 145 plays got a whole 5 cents.
- KVRAF
- 8563 posts since 2 Aug, 2005 from Guitar Land, USA
My videos on youtube channel runbeerrun5 get about 2-5 views each and I profit $75,000 a month roughly. I'm not a human, I'm just a machine like you.
The only site for experimental amp sim freeware & MIDI FX: http://runbeerrun.blogspot.com
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
-
- KVRAF
- 7203 posts since 23 Nov, 2016 from a small city
Buy me a Pacarama?RunBeerRun wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:55 pm My videos on youtube channel runbeerrun5 get about 2-5 views each and I profit $75,000 a month roughly. I'm not a human, I'm just a machine like you.
-
- KVRAF
- 7203 posts since 23 Nov, 2016 from a small city
93 million songs got played fewer than 11 times each!
In one sense those 10 or fewer plays wouldn't result in a meaningful amount of money. In another sense, the pitiful amount generated for one play is the reason. No point in paying someone if the amount is miniscule.
The article mentions AI slop being uploaded to services. It's basically audio shovelware, isn't it?
In one sense those 10 or fewer plays wouldn't result in a meaningful amount of money. In another sense, the pitiful amount generated for one play is the reason. No point in paying someone if the amount is miniscule.
The article mentions AI slop being uploaded to services. It's basically audio shovelware, isn't it?
Last edited by Bunny_boy on Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 14145 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
Go Google the new Deezer royalty payout scheme.
-
- KVRAF
- 7203 posts since 23 Nov, 2016 from a small city
£6,400 for 1,000,000 streams? I think I've got my calculations correct.
You would become a millionaire at 156,000,000 streams.
So Taylor Swift had 26bn streams on Spotify last year, which, if this was Deezer, would mean £170m.
How much do the CEOs get?
- KVRian
- 991 posts since 24 May, 2024
there's a youtube vlog (i forget who authored it) which explains how streaming audio is usually a rip-off and is no way to make money and is actually a complex financial bubble that can't last.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1030 posts since 15 Feb, 2005
music went from an access to distribution problem for creators, ...to an access to trusted/valuable curation problem for consumers...solving the first problem created the second problem as democratizing the production process raised the noise floor...with 60k songs uploaded per day to spotify, how are you going to cut through the noise?...and with so much supply, how will you create demand?...with no demand to leverage, how will you charge a revenue creating price?...without revenue how will you maintain availability of specialized skilled labor?
so what is needed is more and better mechanisms of curation...how do we really know people don't want to listen to that music?...who is allowed to listen to what is being controlled by heuristics in software, ...probably poorly conceived by people who are not SMEs in music...the consumer's agency and self determination is being replaced by the algorithm...a massive concentration of power and control...this is a disturbing trend for humanity...music is a relatively benign example
Music had a one night stand with sound design.....And the condom broke
- KVRian
- 580 posts since 3 Jun, 2009
Benn Jordan perhaps?mjolnir wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:54 am there's a youtube vlog (i forget who authored it) which explains how streaming audio is usually a rip-off and is no way to make money and is actually a complex financial bubble that can't last.
- KVRian
- 991 posts since 24 May, 2024
yes!!!
- KVRAF
- 14145 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
I would not ignore Spotify. They and Pandora have paid me the most with Pandora at the top of that chain.
-
- KVRist
- 148 posts since 20 Jan, 2022
It's never been a better time to be a music consumer, you can find music from all over the world, most of it doesn't cost anything to listen too. There's no paid shills at music magazines "curating". I think people have a short memory, they weren't curating, they were gate keeping. Finding new music is WAY better than it was and all these thousands of songs per day that go uncared about wouldn't have even got recorded back in the day or they would have just stayed as local bands that can only got their friends and family to come to their gigs.bermudagold wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2025 3:50 ammusic went from an access to distribution problem for creators, ...to an access to trusted/valuable curation problem for consumers...solving the first problem created the second problem as democratizing the production process raised the noise floor...with 60k songs uploaded per day to spotify, how are you going to cut through the noise?...and with so much supply, how will you create demand?...with no demand to leverage, how will you charge a revenue creating price?...without revenue how will you maintain availability of specialized skilled labor?
so what is needed is more and better mechanisms of curation...how do we really know people don't want to listen to that music?...who is allowed to listen to what is being controlled by heuristics in software, ...probably poorly conceived by people who are not SMEs in music...the consumer's agency and self determination is being replaced by the algorithm...a massive concentration of power and control...this is a disturbing trend for humanity...music is a relatively benign example
People sign up for these distrokids and what not when they shouldn't, that's why they don't get paid. Nobody is taking from them, they are mugging themselves. It's this were the curation should be involved to stop participating in nonsense schemes.
-
- KVRist
- 215 posts since 5 Jun, 2002 from corpus christi tx
The distribution services get some amount of that when you stop paying so there is some chance about legal fighting at the lower levels. They services can also say that requiring a certain amount of plays may limit competition. We will see.. It takes some effort to get the search engine and when you do it can be hard to control where the traffic goes.bermudagold wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:22 am cause they don't meet minimum streams per month thresholds...this jumps to 95% when talking spotify alone
https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/ ... lays-each/