I find it curious why people feel the need to broadcast that they muted someone. As if anyone including the person muted could give a rat's ass.
Dumb musicians. Always seeking a way to feel important.
I find it curious why people feel the need to broadcast that they muted someone. As if anyone including the person muted could give a rat's ass.
No, quite the opposite. I was pointing out that what you were saying was stupid. You don't have to be a Post Punk guitarist to learn from one. We've released covers of Ultravox, Human League, Simple Minds and Devo songs but that doesn't make us a New Wave band, does it? But there's easily enough similarity for us to have learned a lot from those bands. To suggest that it's something akin to a miracle that Pantera might like a Smiths song is absurd on the face of it.VOODOO U wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 6:17 amYou say dumb things just to drift away from a point that exposes your stupidity.
No, what's really f**king dumb is to think that people are only able to connect with a single genre. To enjoy both Pantera and the Smiths does not require a leap across some vast cavernous ravine, it's just a small step for anyone. To go from what we do to what Drake or Taylor Swift does, though, is a completely different matter.Bottom line, saying someone can't write in a particular genre because they like and have a connection to a different genre is dumb
What the f**k do you know? I hardly ever listen to the type of music NOVAkILL makes, that genre died in the arse 20 years ago. But we can do other things, here's a fully Post Punk song from our 2020 album -especially considering you have a connection to only one genre. You lack any experience connecting to diverse genres.
Right, 40 years of live performance and recording experience pales into insignificance compared to what? You being in and out of bands for a few years? The evidence is all around, you just refuse to see it. I shouldn't have to point it out to you.Exactly. You have no firm evidence and you lack experience.
And how, exactly would I do that? I have absolutely no idea why anyone can even tolerate listening to it, much less actually enjoy it. So where do you start? You can't assume that if you write something you hate, it means that anyone else will like it. It's far more likely that everyone will hate it, so you alienate the audience you have and you gain nothing from anywhere else.I want you to do something more along the lines like Taylor Swift.
There, I fixed that for you.i listen, observe and use something called common sense goes out the window...
That's not evidence-based, there are no sources cited, there is no way to test the veracity of the Bible's claims. OTOH, Justin Bieber's Wikipedia page has 498 footnotes, with links to references, so if you feel something isn't accurate, you can check the source material for yourself. (There are several that cover the part we're talking about.)Are you going to point me to the bible to back up that Jesus died for my sins?
You seem to know a lot about it, are you sure it isn't you who reads that drivel? Last I heard, Mickey 17 was Pattinson's latest film role. (Great film, BTW. Close enough to the book not to be annoying.)You're the type that reads Who or People magazine and thinks every damn thing printed in there is truth. "Oooh look guys! Robert Pattison and Kristen Stewart are in love! It's true love!"
Meanwhile the new Twilight film is about to be released. Naaaah, it's not marketing.
Damn straight you can't, because your dead f**king wrong, mate.I can't prove it; I just know.
But that's not what happened or how. It took a lot of hard graft from PewDiePie to have any success at all. And to be clear, that was his goal from the start. He switched tactics several times, looking for something that would work to his advantage. YouTube was very well established by then, hours of video was already being uploaded every minute of every day, they didn't need to spend money to promote it.As I explained (you big dummy), showing the public that there is hope in obtaining success in having a YouTube channel draws people in.
Yet it would make really good sense for them as the underdog, whereas YouTube has never needed to.You don't see that happening with Vimeo now do you? Of course not.
That's a lovely story but it's bullshit. The ZooTV tour happened more than 10 years before YouTube existed. The three founders had made a lot of money from the sale of PayPal to eBay and got venture capital backing to get it off the ground. Less than two years later they sold out to Google. By the time PewDiePie came along, YouTube was already getting three billion views per day, they were already bigger than anyone would have predicted.YouTube was initially funded, or financially assisted by the band U2. It's what the whole ZooTV tour was for...
Released 13 years before YouTube existed. Don't you bother checking your facts so as not to make a fool of yourself? Because, right now, you look like a proper fool with this.... and what the song Zoo Station was all about.
Because we're not lame fucktards who go around chasing fame and fortune. It is what it is and if it finds an audience, that's great. If it doesn't, I'm not about to turn my life upside-down to make it happen. I've seen what life is like for people who are like that and I have less than no interest in it, thanks. I'll guarantee you that there is no-one in our genre doing this full-time who could afford a yacht or a brand new car. What matters to us is that we're happy with what we do.Well then you should've moved to Europe where you could've done bigger gigs and spread the word more.
The U.S. does have a sense of humor but being that we're mainly workaholics, we tend to find humor in things that are at the expense of others misfortunes . Like Pee Wee Herman getting caught masturbating at a XXX theatre, that was hilarious. Joe Dolce? Not funny. Novakill performing in front of 20 people? f**king hilarious.That's why Joe Dolce topped charts throughout the Civilised World but not in humourless, backwards countries like the USA or Bolivia.
Exactly, which is why I never had much interest in it. That said, we're quite happy to listen to our label and change things around for them, if we think it's not going to ruin our "artistic vision". An extra chorus here or there might give the song more appeal but it won't usually bother us. If it did, we'd push back on it but, in the end, we'd probably acquiesce. It's how collaborations work, you have to respect everyone's contribution and trust their judgement. Saying simply that "your songs aren't strong enough" is confrontational and doesn't help anyone, although I'd hope you were better at it than that.This is one reason why I hated doing A&R -musicians being so sensitive when they're told their songs aren't strong enough. As if they are entitled to having labels love their stuff no questions asked. Get off the damn high horse already. It's BUSINESS.
Again, why it's never really interested me. It's not a business to us and we'd never want it to be. That would just make it work.I love Mr. Bungle's music and don't really care for Matchbox 20 but I'd rather sign the latter because I know I can SELL THE SONGS and buy me a couple Harleys.
Counter-intuitively, when our albums weren't doing nearly as well as they have lately, we regularly got to play to 800-1000 people in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and even in Leipzig. But there was a scene back then, now it's gone. We hope to get a government arts grant to get back over to Europe next year - one final fling before I turn 70. Mind you, John Foxx is still going strong at 76 so I have no real intention of stopping any time soon. I can't imagine a better way to go than dropping dead on stage, mic in hand, can you? But I won't be renewing my passport when it comes due in 2027, now that the government has put the price of a new one up to more than $400. They can go f**k themselves.Zero. And how has that worked out for you? Are there now 21 people showing up at the backyard BBQ show instead of 20?
That's dumb.60 hrs ago, Nobofy wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 6:17 am YouTube was initially funded, or financially assisted by the band U2. It's what the whole ZooTV tour was for and what the song Zoo Station was all about.
Nobody asked you and I'd be surprised if anyone needs you to back them up.
nothing you say can be taken seriously
Couldn't of said it better. This sums you up nicely.you are just a clueless idiot with nothing of value to contribute.
You mean like The Smiths and Pantera both being rock bands? Or getting "facts" from Wikipedia and YouTube? Like Justin Bieber never needing to suck anything to break big? Do tell how you know so much about Justin.Getting your facts right matters.
jupiter8 wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 1:20 pm U2 also invented the tampon. That's what the song Sunday Bloody Sunday is about......
You're done, son, time to give it away. It's just embarrassing now, you're making everyone a little uncomfortable watching you flounder.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026