I bought Pigments mostly because of its UI, which I like. But I, too, have never used it. Pigments sounds bland and uninteresting to me. I have admittedly not spent a lot of time programming my own sounds. But if the presets are ALL lackluster, that usually tells you something about a synth. How can so many professional sound designers come up with so little?jamcat wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 12:58 am I got Pigments for $49 in 2020 and have still never used it.
Arturia V Collection - Development to Version 12
-
- KVRist
- 179 posts since 23 Mar, 2025
Last edited by Hyperbole on Sat Apr 26, 2025 5:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRist
- 179 posts since 23 Mar, 2025
I am helping a new friend work on a few of her tracks that she has created in FL Studio. I didn't realize that, as of 2018, there has been a Mac version of FL Studio. (Hell has frozen over.)ghettosynth wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 12:30 am So many people will just keep upgrading. I'm sure that they think this through and choose the route that nets them the most profit. They make public statements about what they will do and then change their mind, probably when they need a cash infusion. At one point they stated that they will never do a $99 upgrade, and then, it's happened.
I wish them well, but, the more you have, the less time each tool is used.
So, I downloaded the latest 2024 "Producer Edition" version of FL Studio for the Mac, which I had originally purchased for Windows back in 2003. I got all the upgrades from the past 20+ years for no charge. THAT is the way to handle upgrades!
But for me to get the latest version of the Arturia SEM V, I have to pay $299 for the entire V Collection upgrade. (Or buy the SEM V plugin again for $149.) I have other SEM plugins that sound as good if not better. Again, Arturia needs me (and customers like me) way more than we need them, given that there are good or better-sounding alternatives for most of their plugins.
- KVRAF
- 6296 posts since 12 Jan, 2018
Thanks for all the replies to my $199 pricing question earlier.
I realized that the pricing is indeed correct/normal and it is indeed V Collection and any individual V Collection instruments that would count towards the discount, as this is an "upgrade" offer.
Discount based on owning other products, like FX Collection 5 and Pigments, is what Arturia calls a "crossgrade" pricing, which is usually a better deal than "upgrade", but it comes around occasionally.
So, $199 upgrade isn't bad but I am not sure if it is worth spending right now. Hopefully we will get a better deal after a few months and certainly during Black Friday 2025.
I realized that the pricing is indeed correct/normal and it is indeed V Collection and any individual V Collection instruments that would count towards the discount, as this is an "upgrade" offer.
Discount based on owning other products, like FX Collection 5 and Pigments, is what Arturia calls a "crossgrade" pricing, which is usually a better deal than "upgrade", but it comes around occasionally.
So, $199 upgrade isn't bad but I am not sure if it is worth spending right now. Hopefully we will get a better deal after a few months and certainly during Black Friday 2025.
-
- KVRist
- 413 posts since 6 Apr, 2014
I agree with this. I bought the V Collection second hand and have barely used it as most synths have better options elsewhere, but the Synclavier is really special. I fell in love with it and ended up getting a Regen.IvyBirds wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 2:50 am
For me the best synth they make is the Synclavier V as it has the exact code that Cameron Jones the original programmer wrote for the original synth, then ported over to the C programming language by Cameron Jones and licensed to Arturia
-
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 25 Jan, 2007
It's a funny old thing. I could have written that word-for-word about Massive X. Yet Pigments has a lot of sonic appeal to me (even though, in practice, I don't often reach for it as I'm generally an analog-head).Hyperbole wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:02 am Pigments sounds bland and uninteresting to me. I have admittedly not spent a lot of time programming my own sounds. But if the presets are ALL lackluster, that usually tells you something about a synth. How can so many professional sound designers come up with so little?
http://www.guyrowland.co.uk
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15
-
- KVRist
- 179 posts since 23 Mar, 2025
LOL. I do say the same things about Massive X and especially the original Massive. Very underwhelming, IMO. Which is a bit strange. Both Pigments and Massive (and Massive X to a lesser degree) have excellent UIs. And yet, to my ears, they just don't make very compelling sounds (except for maybe good-sounding filter FM in Massive X). That's just one man's opinion, of course.noiseboyuk wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 6:04 am It's a funny old thing. I could have written that word-for-word about Massive X.
-
- KVRist
- 311 posts since 31 Oct, 2015
Perhaps you prefer « analog » sounding synths over « digital » sounding synths ?
-
Fernando Carvalho Fernando Carvalho https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=31855
- KVRist
- 208 posts since 5 Jul, 2004
I use pigments a lot for granular sounds mainly, I like the new modal engine a lot too, but I have to work a little more to adopt it fully. As a VA maybe is not the more appealing synth, but for other kind of things it is very good, at least for me.
Fernando Carvalho
http://soundcloud.com/fernandocarvalho
http://soundcloud.com/fernandocarvalho
-
- KVRAF
- 1703 posts since 25 Jul, 2009
I'm sure all V collection owners have their favorites. Mine are the Matrix 12V and the Synclavier V.IvyBirds wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 2:50 am For me the best synth they make is the Synclavier V as it has the exact code that Cameron Jones the original programmer wrote for the original synth, then ported over to the C programming language by Cameron Jones and licensed to Arturia
I use those the most, by far.
-
- KVRAF
- 9866 posts since 15 Sep, 2005 from East Coast of the USA
Similar to Diva... that would be cool.VitaminD wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:41 am If they really wanted to get crazy with the cheese whiz, they could let us pick and chose oscillator types, filters, and envelopes from the entire collection. That'd be fun.
-
Vocalpoint Studios Vocalpoint Studios https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=3112
- KVRian
- 893 posts since 20 Jun, 2002
Couldn't have said it better.Hyperbole wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 12:17 am Arturia seems to think I am the one who needs their products when it is Arturia who needs my business. And they have lost that business by overcharging for underwhelming upgrades.
An upgrade of $299.00 (Euro/USD) considering I have already purchased 6 prior versions of VC - is simply a non-starter.
And I could have sworn my v9 -> V10 upgrade price was just $199.00. But instead of making even the slightest bit of effort to at least try to "reel" me in - they add another $100 to the upgrade price and figure that is going to work?
These guys need a new slide rule over there in the accountiing and marketing department.
VP
-
- KVRer
- 1 posts since 16 Aug, 2021
I hope Arturia team is reading this forum. I just came here to say that the V11 collection is a bit underwhelming. There is no "fear of missing out" by not upgrading this year. I really hope they are working on a Polybrute 12 V to include in their next collection (conveniently named V12) that would mean an instant buy from me.
- KVRian
- 1112 posts since 26 Jun, 2008 from Czech Republic
The only reason I have kept my Arturia bundles up to date was the option of paying them in 4 installments. I can do 50 bucks each month. But I can't do 200 at once. Unfortunatelly that's not happening. This time around that option seems to be limited to France residents only. So eventhough I love JP8000 kinds of music, I think I stay with JP6K and the digital oscillator in Diva.
Evovled into noctucat...
http://www.noctucat.com/
http://www.noctucat.com/
-
- KVRist
- 484 posts since 5 Jan, 2004 from In the now
Agree, almost all of Arturias synths has mediocre at best presets. Most are downright awful. You have to dig in to appreciate the synths sounds.Hyperbole wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:02 amI bought Pigments mostly because of its UI, which I like. But I, too, have never used it. Pigments sounds bland and uninteresting to me. I have admittedly not spent a lot of time programming my own sounds. But if the presets are ALL lackluster, that usually tells you something about a synth. How can so many professional sound designers come up with so little?jamcat wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 12:58 am I got Pigments for $49 in 2020 and have still never used it.
"If less is more, just think of how much more, more will be".

