Frequency Block Synthesis

[Innovative synthesis]

Do you understand clearly, what FBS is?

[whyterabbyt]

I understand clearly that its not a new method or instrument.

[Innovative synthesis]

Why? What are your arguments? I'm interested in it.

[crimsonwarlock]

Why? What are your arguments? I'm interested in it.

He made his arguments several times now. You just fail to see that he is stating the obvious.

I see it even simpler: you are using an existing instrument to do something. Ergo, that instrument was already capable of doing it, as you didn't make any technical modifications to this existing instrument. The 'method' is already there, as it is defined in the hardware. You didn't invent the 'method'. End of discussion.

[Innovative synthesis]

If you make a new vst, or a new software, or a new data processing or anything on your pc, it is not new, because you made it on a pc, that is already capable to do the method you made with any data...You just used a pc, that was already able earlier to do your new "thing".Amazing argument. This is not discussion from your side. This is:"NO-WAY".

[whyterabbyt]

If you make a new vst, or a new software, or a new data processing or anything on your pc, it is not new, because you made it on a pc, that is already capable to do the method you made with any data...You just used a pc, that was already able earlier to do your new "thing".Amazing argument.

No, this is not an 'amazing argument', because its not anyone's argument. Its a strawman.

If you make a new vst, or a new software, or a new data processing or anything on your pc, it is not new just because you made it on a pc. And noone claimed that it was new just because it was made on a PC.

It is not the case that if something is capable of running an algorithm, then the algorithm is not new. Please dont pretend the potential to do something is the same as doing it.

But that VST etc could, potentially include a new algorithm which does something which worked in an entirely new way, and that would make it new. Because something has to be original to be new, and non-original things are not new.

A PC is a reprogrammable device. The algorithms/processes it will run are not predetermined..

A Motif workstation synth is a preprogrammed device. The algorithms/processed it runs are predetermined.

You are claiming the terms 'new instrument' and 'new method' apply in a situation where the a predetermined algorithm/process is being used as the implementation. There is no new, custom or bespoke algorithm. You are using an existing device in exactly the hardcoded way the device was designed to be used. There is nothing 'new' to that.

[Tj Shredder]

Sounds like something you could bang together with Csound

Or any modular or any multitimbral synth or… There is absolutely no need to buy 128 sounds for an absurd price to get this.
What I‘ve heard so far is exactly the only approach I use wavetables since they appeared. Best is a synth that actually can create waveforms by combining partials like Icarus or Thorn. That way I can shape it in much more detail than being restricted to 24 possible „blocks“. Its actually quite simple to get that same result with a single wavetable except for beatings between the detuning between those layers… Ok, you use more filters, but in a modular you can beef it up as you like easily…

[Innovative synthesis]

Regarding pricing. I asked chatgpt for a real price, and since chatgpt uderstands clearly FBS, I accepted what it offered to sell it for a price tag of 89 EUR. So "1st sounds" real price is now 89 EUR in my catalogue page at denmusic.hu. Setting a price tag on a new thing is difficult, but now it's set correctly.

[vurt]

Regarding pricing. I asked chatgpt for a real price, and since chatgpt uderstands clearly FBS, I accepted what it offered to sell it for a price tag of 89 EUR. So "1st sounds" real price is now 89 EUR in my catalogue page at denmusic.hu.

awesome!

[Innovative synthesis]

Recently I started to create and test a random instrument generator using Frequency Block Synthesis. It's amazing at first. You will be able to save them as .sfz. You can creat tons of new instruments with by pushing one button...
Imagine thousands of blocks in the background. Then you come, push a button, then....

[Innovative synthesis]

Here is the result of first raw test pack of instruments out of Frequency Block Synthesis Random Sound Generator and VST. You can see that all instruments share the same 8 frequency blocks as partial sources. And still all sound different.
These are raw sounds. This means they are without any manipulation on AEG, no subtractive engine features, no effects. Pure Frequency Block Synthesis. These are randomized instruments and saved to .sfz in order of appearance from FBS sound generator. Judge it yourself how effective this synthesis is. Today I achieved copyright on any software and physical applications of Frequency Block Synthesis having readme.md, license.txt and timestamped declaration from chatgpt on finished FBS RandomSynth Software. For licensing inquiries you may contact me.

[TechM3X]

This claim of Frequency Block Synthesis reminds me of a self-annointed physicist grifter proclaiming his theory of Geometric Unity as legitimate Science.

[whyterabbyt]

Today I achieved copyright

Ah, well, there you are then. If you got copyright, then that proves its not a method, as its only patent law that applies to methods.

on any software and physical applications of Frequency Block Synthesis

No. The copyright for the pre-existing software you are using belongs to the makers of that software, not you.
And you cannot copyright 'physical applications' that's not what copyright covers.

[crimsonwarlock]

...from chatgpt

I hope you realize that ChatGPT is not a lawyer, and its output has no legal standing. Also, ChatGPT is known for generating complete BS when it comes to legal issues. So, without talking to a real lawyer, your statements are basically meaningless.

[Tj Shredder]

I must admit the lack of contact with reality is entertaining… The core of that method is finding a fluffy name which sounds like something new. Then it doesn’t need to be new…
Better you listen to the advice of real experienced people you get here, than to ChatGPT which simply wants you to like its answers, which are only a mirror of your own desires…
But you will gain your own experience. Even if you find enough to be fooled…