Motorola DSP563xx Emulator (BETA) (Access Virus, Nord Lead, Waldorf MW...)
RELATED
PRODUCTS DSP56300 Emulator JE8086 Nodal Red 2x Osirus OsTIrus Retromulator$29.00Buy Vavra Xenia
PRODUCTS DSP56300 Emulator JE8086 Nodal Red 2x Osirus OsTIrus Retromulator$29.00Buy Vavra Xenia
-
- KVRian
- 671 posts since 11 Apr, 2006
I agree Discord as an official communication and community platform kind of sucks, because of Discord's crappiness in requiring personal information to sign up and their slow/crummy client, and also because it makes the information non-visible publicly and to search engines, archiving, finding years later when you remember something you want to look up...
But I guess it's what younger people prefer, for various reasons.
But I guess it's what younger people prefer, for various reasons.
- KVRAF
- 7021 posts since 19 Apr, 2002 from Utah
I don't want to be negative. But I have to say it... Most of the synths that have been recreated don't have anything that special to me as far as sound goes. My guess is that most of this is more out of nostalgic fun, rather than making music with--after all, the CPU usage is really high. I know that the Virus was considered a big sound for about a decade, but I honestly don't understand what was so special about it. Maybe it had a special sound that was special for a particular genre of music?
Vendor‑Dependent Copy Protection: Customers lose. Pirates win.
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
To be totally honest, using the emulations has lowered my desire for owning one of these hardware synths a LOT as well. But, I consider that a good thing. 
The Virus TI emu sounds very good though. But, so does Spire. And only uses a fraction of the CPU OsTIrus uses.
As far as I read on the Discord channel, quite a few people owning the hardware actually replaced it with the emulations. Speaks volumes about the comfort of using plugins against using hardware.
The Virus TI emu sounds very good though. But, so does Spire. And only uses a fraction of the CPU OsTIrus uses.
As far as I read on the Discord channel, quite a few people owning the hardware actually replaced it with the emulations. Speaks volumes about the comfort of using plugins against using hardware.
- KVRAF
- 7787 posts since 20 Jul, 2004 from Clearwater
OsTIrus hardly uses any CPU on my M2 Max. It sounds the same as the hardware Virus TI and pretty much blows away any VA synth plugin including Spire and Sylenth. When I was comparing OsTIrus to Sylenth, it kind of made Sylenth sound closer to that Tone2 cartoonish vibe, and Spire sounds thin.
Last edited by djanthonyw on Thu Jul 24, 2025 4:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wavsen.com - Professional mix delivery platform with client approval, watermarking, and portfolio page builder.
-
- KVRAF
- 12083 posts since 2 Dec, 2004 from North Wales
I had a hardware TI and now use OsTIrus (for nostalgia!) but I also think most modern VSTS sound just as good and have better features (browsers, MPE etc) - Dune, Current, Spire (not that modern!) etc. Given the age of the DSP code the Virus is based on, it shows that it was seriously good even a decade ago and not that much has really improved since then in the world VA!
X32 Desk, i9 PC, S88MK3, S1, BWS, Live + PUSH 3, Osmose, RedShift 6 Pro3, Tempera, Syntakt, Digitone II, OP1-F, OPXY, Eurorack, TD27 Drums, Guitars, Basses, Amps and of course lots of pedals!
- KVRAF
- 20686 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
No plugin sounds like the Nord. It’s its own thing.
-
- KVRAF
- 2775 posts since 24 Nov, 2023
I think that can be said about pretty much every software recreation of vintage Synths, as well as hardware clones/reissuesaudiojunkie wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 3:01 pm I don't want to be negative. But I have to say it... Most of the synths that have been recreated don't have anything that special to me as far as sound goes. My guess is that most of this is more out of nostalgic fun, rather than making music with--after all, the CPU usage is really high. I know that the Virus was considered a big sound for about a decade, but I honestly don't understand what was so special about it. Maybe it had a special sound that was special for a particular genre of music?
It's driven by nostalgia especially by Gen X people like myself
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s there were many synths that I either owned at the time or wish I could have owned
To buy originals all of them now would cost well into the hundreds of thousands, but getting the software versions scratches the nostalgia itch quite well for very little money or physical space
- KVRist
- 419 posts since 11 Jan, 2014
I’m waiting for them to release the Waldorf Q wasn’t keen on Vavra/Micro Q.
- KVRAF
- 20686 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
Is there any difference in sound?RobGee wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 6:26 pm I’m waiting for them to release the Waldorf Q wasn’t keen on Vavra/Micro Q.
I'm waiting for them to release a Q+.
-
- KVRAF
- 3220 posts since 23 Dec, 2002
I own a Virus C. My best guess as to why it (Virus line) endured and still has a lot of fans is that the whole instrument just seems to be tuned to make good usable sounds. You pull up a preset and start knobbing around and you’ll get something useable with ease. It looks great on a desk, is reasonably compact and well built and has knobs in most of the places you’d want them. I compare it to the Hydrasynth. With it you have a very well thought out interface but to tame it you wind up going through 9654 variations of door buzzer until you get the hang of it. The Virus is near instant fun with purpose rolled into one great sounding machine. At least that is how I experience it.
quote=djanthonyw post_id=9109589 time=1753373032 user_id=33882]
OsTIrus hardly uses any CPU on my M2 Max. It sounds the same as the hardware Virus TI and pretty much blows away any VA synth plugin including Spire and Sylenth. When I was comparing OsTIrus to Sylenth, it kind of made Sylenth sound closer to that Tone2 cartoonish vibe, and Spire sounds thin.
[/quote]
quote=djanthonyw post_id=9109589 time=1753373032 user_id=33882]
OsTIrus hardly uses any CPU on my M2 Max. It sounds the same as the hardware Virus TI and pretty much blows away any VA synth plugin including Spire and Sylenth. When I was comparing OsTIrus to Sylenth, it kind of made Sylenth sound closer to that Tone2 cartoonish vibe, and Spire sounds thin.
[/quote]
- KVRAF
- 7021 posts since 19 Apr, 2002 from Utah
Yeah, this makes sense to me. I'm also a Gen-X latchkey kid (...but at least my parents tried to be home as much as possible.IvyBirds wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 5:23 pmI think that can be said about pretty much every software recreation of vintage Synths, as well as hardware clones/reissuesaudiojunkie wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 3:01 pm I don't want to be negative. But I have to say it... Most of the synths that have been recreated don't have anything that special to me as far as sound goes. My guess is that most of this is more out of nostalgic fun, rather than making music with--after all, the CPU usage is really high. I know that the Virus was considered a big sound for about a decade, but I honestly don't understand what was so special about it. Maybe it had a special sound that was special for a particular genre of music?
It's driven by nostalgia especially by Gen X people like myself
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s there were many synths that I either owned at the time or wish I could have owned
To buy originals all of them now would cost well into the hundreds of thousands, but getting the software versions scratches the nostalgia itch quite well for very little money or physical space
Vendor‑Dependent Copy Protection: Customers lose. Pirates win.
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
-
- KVRAF
- 4371 posts since 15 Sep, 2010
- KVRAF
- 20686 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
Thanks! Now I want the Q! In any event, it's good to know that we should stop using Vavra in multi mode.
-
- KVRian
- 1105 posts since 11 Dec, 2020
The fun fact. Ostirus is not a Virus Ti emulation since your are running the firmware with all the code form Access. The emulation is only the Motorola DSP.chk071 wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 3:23 pm As far as I read on the Discord channel, quite a few people owning the hardware actually replaced it with the emulations. Speaks volumes about the comfort of using plugins against using hardware.
That being said, for 2025 the Virus is a pretty dated synth with a lot of aliasing, not so many modulation slots, and his filters are dull.
I'm afraid. My Virus is sleeping in its box. I almost never use Ostirus.
Last edited by Gam456 on Fri Jul 25, 2025 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
vitocorleone123 vitocorleone123 https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=333504
- KVRAF
- 2490 posts since 30 Jun, 2014 from Pacific NW
It sounds better than the majority of software synths to me.Gam456 wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 9:21 pmThe fun fact. Ostirus is not a Virus Ti emulation since your are running the firmware with all the code form Access. The emulation is only the Motorola DSP.chk071 wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 3:23 pm As far as I read on the Discord channel, quite a few people owning the hardware actually replaced it with the emulations. Speaks volumes about the comfort of using plugins against using hardware.
That being said, for 2025 the Virus is a pretty dated synth with a lot of aliasing, not so many modulation slots, and his filters are dull.
I'm afraid. My Virus is sleeping its box. I almost never use Ostirus.
