UAD Anthem - Very Good Sounding
-
- KVRist
- 311 posts since 31 Oct, 2015
It has a great sound no doubt ! I wish they had parameter modulation in the sequencer and separate pitch modulation of the oscillators.
Some parameters are missing in DAW remote : all the « little » switches (lfo / fenv) and some of « light » switches.
Some parameters are missing in DAW remote : all the « little » switches (lfo / fenv) and some of « light » switches.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3821 posts since 20 Apr, 2005
The more I use this synth and the more I like it. Has a good range for such a simple synth. Can sound quite acidy too.
Needs a bit of tweaking at times, but worth the patience to dig into the sweet spots. Really has quite a unique sound too.
I'm kinda surprised it's not had much talk here as tonally it's def AAA to my ears.
Needs a bit of tweaking at times, but worth the patience to dig into the sweet spots. Really has quite a unique sound too.
I'm kinda surprised it's not had much talk here as tonally it's def AAA to my ears.
-
- KVRian
- 998 posts since 31 Oct, 2020
I think UA synths do not have the best reputation here due to the lack of proper MIDI mapping and lack of MPE or what have you. People here tend to prefer more nerdy synths. In my opinion all UA synths including Polymax, Opal and Anthem sound absolutely incredible and far better than most software synths. They are the only ones that occasionally make me forget I am not playing my hardware analogues if I focus purely on the sound. The only other soft synth that comes close sonically is Massive X which is of course a very different beast with much more flexibility and sound design potential but UA synths sound warmer straight out of the box. Big sweets pots they are
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3821 posts since 20 Apr, 2005
Yes those complaints do get raised, also lack of LFOs and modulation mapping, and it's true this could be better. Opal in particular is quite clunky to program.
But for sure these are among my best sounding soft synths, and I agree Massive X is also great sounding (also a bit of a pain to program at times). All top tier for sure.
edit: I changed the thread title to be more accurate
But for sure these are among my best sounding soft synths, and I agree Massive X is also great sounding (also a bit of a pain to program at times). All top tier for sure.
edit: I changed the thread title to be more accurate
- KVRAF
- 20825 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
My understanding is they just got midi mapping.
- KVRAF
- 18467 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
I agree with all that, and I do own and use them all, but that doesn't stop me from requesting stuff that I feel is important. It's not 2010. We now have quite a few keyboards and controllers that feature polyphonic aftertouch. Supporting the full MIDI spec. isn't really a huge request.audiouser720 wrote: Sun Sep 07, 2025 8:19 am I think UA synths do not have the best reputation here due to the lack of proper MIDI mapping and lack of MPE or what have you. People here tend to prefer more nerdy synths. In my opinion all UA synths including Polymax, Opal and Anthem sound absolutely incredible and far better than most software synths. They are the only ones that occasionally make me forget I am not playing my hardware analogues if I focus purely on the sound. The only other soft synth that comes close sonically is Massive X which is of course a very different beast with much more flexibility and sound design potential but UA synths sound warmer straight out of the box. Big sweets pots they are
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
- KVRAF
- 4080 posts since 28 Jan, 2011 from MEXICO
LOL I found them super generic, boring, uninspired, like something that would have came out 20 years ago.audiouser720 wrote: Sun Sep 07, 2025 8:19 am In my opinion all UA synths including Polymax, Opal and Anthem sound absolutely incredible and far better than most software synths. They are the only ones that occasionally make me forget I am not playing my hardware analogues if I focus purely on the sound. The only other soft synth that comes close sonically is Massive X which is of course a very different beast with much more flexibility and sound design potential but UA synths sound warmer straight out of the box. Big sweets pots they are
They don't even touch diva.
dedication to flying
-
- KVRian
- 998 posts since 31 Oct, 2020
Well we’re all different and that’s fine. I find Diva sounds a bit artificial and difficult to mix. It feels like a frankenstein analogue, trying too hard to sound vintage. The originals it models often have broad sweet spots and just sound good (apart from the MS-20), whereas Diva lacks that immediacy to my ears. It doesn’t respond like my real analogue synths, but it’s still good for what it is. I find UAD more immediate.rod_zero wrote: Sun Sep 07, 2025 11:49 pmLOL I found them super generic, boring, uninspired, like something that would have came out 20 years ago.audiouser720 wrote: Sun Sep 07, 2025 8:19 am In my opinion all UA synths including Polymax, Opal and Anthem sound absolutely incredible and far better than most software synths. They are the only ones that occasionally make me forget I am not playing my hardware analogues if I focus purely on the sound. The only other soft synth that comes close sonically is Massive X which is of course a very different beast with much more flexibility and sound design potential but UA synths sound warmer straight out of the box. Big sweets pots they are
They don't even touch diva.
- KVRAF
- 8037 posts since 28 Dec, 2015 from Atlantis Island
Heretic!audiouser720 wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 7:11 am ... I find Diva sounds a bit artificial and difficult to mix. It feels like a frankenstein analogue, trying too hard to sound vintage. The originals it models often have broad sweet spots and just sound good (apart from the MS-20), whereas Diva lacks that immediacy to my ears. It doesn’t respond like my real analogue synths, but it’s still good for what it is...
Where are the pitchforks when we need them?
https://sonograyn.bandcamp.com/music Experimental Ambient
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
- KVRAF
- 18467 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
That's funny. Diva is great for a lot of things, but it can't touch the level of analog emulation of the UAD plugins, or even its sibling, Repro. Not that you need it to make great sounding music, but if you want it, Diva's weaker in that respect.rod_zero wrote: Sun Sep 07, 2025 11:49 pmLOL I found them super generic, boring, uninspired, like something that would have came out 20 years ago.audiouser720 wrote: Sun Sep 07, 2025 8:19 am In my opinion all UA synths including Polymax, Opal and Anthem sound absolutely incredible and far better than most software synths. They are the only ones that occasionally make me forget I am not playing my hardware analogues if I focus purely on the sound. The only other soft synth that comes close sonically is Massive X which is of course a very different beast with much more flexibility and sound design potential but UA synths sound warmer straight out of the box. Big sweets pots they are
They don't even touch diva.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
grandmasterbird grandmasterbird https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=134988
- KVRist
- 440 posts since 7 Jan, 2007
The UAD synths sound brilliant to my ears. Polymax is a little limited, and I find the mod matrix a bit fiddly in Opal, but to me they are among the best sounding in my collection. Opal in particular is a gem. Definitely need to check out Anthem and see what it's all about
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3821 posts since 20 Apr, 2005
Anthem is really good. It has some nice sweet spots on the filter, but they need to be honed in on.
Can be quite grungy, the sound is thick and it can do things from quite decent acid through to rich saws. FX simple but really good.
I find it doesn't always work for everything, but when it does it's great.
Can be quite grungy, the sound is thick and it can do things from quite decent acid through to rich saws. FX simple but really good.
I find it doesn't always work for everything, but when it does it's great.
- GRRRRRRR!
- 17821 posts since 14 Jun, 2001 from Somewhere you're not!
Well, you'll be pleased to see it's only $99 at the moment. I think I will wait until it's $49.Greenstorm33 wrote: Wed Jun 18, 2025 2:41 amWell I'm judging it, based on everything else that's already out thereTo me this is a $120 synth absolute max purely based on the features.
I'll take their sound quality over anyone else's imagination every day of the week.
To me it's like keyless entry and ignition - all I have to do is walk up, open the door and start the engine. I never have to touch the key, as long as it's in my pocket I can go anywhere and do anything.osiris wrote: Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:51 pmTo me, this is a $99 synth (if that) Plus you get the extra bonus of the iLok/Pace stuff. I always think (especially now) iLok is like buying a car and the dealer taking the keys and telling you, Okay. Anytime you want to drive it, come see me for the keys.
The thing is, though, that you could buy a $200 phone that would do all those same things, mostly to the same standard. And you probably upgrade to a new one far more often than you need to, so you're likely spending thousands more than you need to over time. Yet you're only willing to pay $39 for a softsynth you can use for decades. I find that more than a bit weird.miloszz wrote: Thu Jun 19, 2025 11:17 pmMy iphone is a competent camera for EBay (so has arguably paid for itself anyway), connects me to all of my friends, can be used for music making, is an e-reader and a game system, a navigation system for my car, conduit to Bandcamp and Apple Music libraries for my car, podcasts for my commute and walks, etc..
A phone is worth the price.
Really? I think Opal has one of the best, most intuitive, easy to work with synth interfaces I have ever seen. Sure, it would be nice to have a few combined destinations in the MM on occasion but that's a minor issue, really, given that you can do so much without having to use the MM at all. I only got it a couple of weeks ago but I can see it becoming one of my most used synths.
Anthem sounds great and looks really easy to work with, but I don't need it so I'm happy to wait until it's $49. UA sort of shoot themselves in the foot with their sales and discounts, although I am sure a lot of pros just buy everything without giving price a second thought.
NOVAkILL : Legion GO, AMD Z1x, 16GB RAM, Win11 | Audient EVO 8 | Lumi Keys | Studio Pro 8
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron
-
- KVRian
- 759 posts since 13 Apr, 2017
Other c/r copy protection systems, besides iLok, are exactly the same, the manufacturer keeps the keys on a chain. It feels like you don't really own the license. If there is no other way, i'd still prefer iLok rather than being dependent on the activation servers of smaller developers. Especially if the dev is a one-man show. Just imagine something happens to a dev. It's game over for your licenses too, at least if it's time to reactivate or reinstall on a new system.BONES wrote: Tue Sep 16, 2025 2:41 pmTo me it's like keyless entry and ignition - all I have to do is walk up, open the door and start the engine. I never have to touch the key, as long as it's in my pocket I can go anywhere and do anything.osiris wrote: Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:51 pmTo me, this is a $99 synth (if that) Plus you get the extra bonus of the iLok/Pace stuff. I always think (especially now) iLok is like buying a car and the dealer taking the keys and telling you, Okay. Anytime you want to drive it, come see me for the keys.
-
- KVRist
- 318 posts since 5 Jul, 2019
Incorrect.BONES wrote: Tue Sep 16, 2025 2:41 pm The thing is, though, that you could buy a $200 phone that would do all those same things,
.
Incorrect.And you probably upgrade to a new one far more often than you need to,
Realistically I’m willing to pay $0 for this VST that does nothing unique or special. A $39 intro price might have caught me on impulse.Yet you're only willing to pay $39
Extremely unlikely.for a softsynth you can use for decades.
I find it a bit weird to convince yourself this is worth $100 (on sale!) when TAL Noisemaker and U-he’s Tyrell N6 are free.I find that more than a bit weird.
