We're talking about two totally different markets here. Must realize we still have plenty of hardcore hardware junkies around, and for valid reasons which have been covered a million times on here (lack of crashing, turn the thing on and play without updates, patching this, replacing that, no running out of CPU, etc.) Again, I keep coming back to this point of we're extremely spoiled now. We can get good to excellent quality software for a fraction of the price I was spending on hardware 10 years ago. Software is getting closer and closer to hardware in its unique qualities, but still isn't quite there. Not to mention, there's still plenty of unique hardware out there that hasn't been emulated yet either. I love my hardware, and I love my software. It's all music, that's all that should matter.danielmm wrote:I was not impressed with the price and the fact that it is monophonic. It's a great synth for the old analogue die-hards and for the knob junkies but will they sell a lot of them?...I mean with all the great software emulations out there, how can they make money on this thing?
I think it has it's place, but it would appeal to a very small market in my estimation and anyone who wants that sound could pick up a number software packages for less than 1/10th of the cost for guys like me with a small bedroom studio.
If you have tried the Voyager, what are your thoughts and what software would you suggest comes closest to this sound?
dano
Why should it matter if it only caters to a small market? It's a bigger market than say preamps you'll see in top end mastering studios, but they don't seem concerned over the price, or marketting, or anything else besides the best quality, no matter what the price.
The car analogy works very well in this aspect, and has already been covered. If all you care is that it has 4 wheels, and gets you from point A to point B, then that's what you need. If you need more speed, quality, features, etc. you spend more money.
Devon

