Audiothing Releases JUNE (Juno-60 Emulation)

[audiothing]

Sounds good, but a few workflow things are bothering me.

Thanks a lot for the detailed feedback, really appreciated! I’ll keep collecting feedbacks and see what makes sense to improve in a future update. I already have plans for a better browser with tags, favourites, etc.

About the factory presets, I actually wanted to include them, but my JUNO didn’t like the factory reset WAV files I found online. I don’t just want to just copy the parameters, I want to make sure they sound like on my hardware before adding them.

[audiothing]

phaser sounds verynice imho
is it the phase motion ?

It's in part derived by it, but improved as we are also working on another big phaser...

[muki]

It's in part derived by it, but improved as we are also working on another big phaser...

HA! cool
i do like the sound - has something special about it
different than the others (u-he, uvi, eventide...)

[sqigls]

phaser sounds verynice imho
is it the phase motion ?

It's in part derived by it, but improved as we are also working on another big phaser...

siiiiiiiiiiik

[Chicken Drummy]

Man, I love me some AudioThing software.

That is all.

[aMUSEd]

phaser sounds verynice imho
is it the phase motion ?

It's in part derived by it, but improved as we are also working on another big phaser...

I hope it's a small big phaser

[phreaque]

... The way the saw + sub osc sound together is very different in TAL's version.

The Sub oscillator which is a square wave, has an alignment of 90 degree offset in phase. The actual sawtooth + sub in Juno-60 should look like this:

Screenshot 2025-10-13 11.33.06.png

Otherwise it would sound just like the Juno-106, where the combination of sawtooth & sub produces a low octave saw (if the sub is set at max mix level).

※ Developers should really pay more attention to oscillator phase parameter, it's a very crucial aspect.

[audiothing]

Thanks for the heads up, I’ll check it when I’m back in the studio. I’m already working on a small update with general improvements based on the feedback so far.

[phreaque]

A good idea is to have a dedicated phase rotate knob for the sub-oscillator.

[Nug Wrangler]

Thanks for the heads up, I’ll check it when I’m back in the studio. I’m already working on a small update with general improvements based on the feedback so far.

I'm having a bit of trouble with the keytracking of the filter with max resonance (self oscillation) Its hard to make it in 'tune'. I dont know if it is a bug or if it is the same in the Juno, but wanted to mention it anyway.

[muki]

I'm having a bit of trouble with the keytracking of the filter with max resonance (self

+1
not so with TAL's juno

but maybe a speciality of the hardware?
anybody has the hardware and can compare ?

[telecharge]

People like to hate on KVR, but here we have one of my favorite sound designers talking shop with one of my favorite developers about their latest instrument -- with users providing feedback.

How cool is that?

[audiothing]

A good idea is to have a dedicated phase rotate knob for the sub-oscillator.

That would actually be really nice. I’ll see if we can implement it. Anyway, I can confirm that the suboscillator phase is not correct at the moment. We’ll fix it.

[audiothing]

I'm having a bit of trouble with the keytracking of the filter with max resonance (self oscillation) Its hard to make it in 'tune'. I dont know if it is a bug or if it is the same in the Juno, but wanted to mention it anyway.

Yes, it looks like the scaling isn’t quite right. We’re already working on it for v1.0.1.

[Nug Wrangler]

I'm having a bit of trouble with the keytracking of the filter with max resonance (self oscillation) Its hard to make it in 'tune'. I dont know if it is a bug or if it is the same in the Juno, but wanted to mention it anyway.

Yes, it looks like the scaling isn’t quite right. We’re already working on it for v1.0.1.

Thank you