Virtual JV: free Roland JV-880 emulation
- KVRAF
- 23026 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Okay, I finally found them. Put them in the rom folder that opens when I load the plugin, reloaded the plugin but it still doesn't work. Says can't find ROM files. I'm on Windows 11, Cubase 14.
- KVRAF
- 20874 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
A lot of people are saying this lately. Maybe install an older version.
- KVRAF
- 23026 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
An older version of what?Uncle E wrote: Sun Nov 16, 2025 3:58 am A lot of people are saying this lately. Maybe install an older version.
- KVRAF
- 1746 posts since 3 Nov, 2023
Using "jv880 rom download" as the search, the first result is what you need.
You're welcome
How original
- KVRAF
- 23026 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
I did eventually find it but it doesn't work in Cubase 14, Windows 11.seafire wrote: Sun Nov 16, 2025 6:28 am
Using "jv880 rom download" as the search, the first result is what you need.
You're welcome
-
- KVRAF
- 3335 posts since 18 May, 2003 from Sweden
Did you try with the standalone?
If it were easy, anybody could do it!
- KVRAF
- 24447 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Yes do it in standalone first.
-
- KVRAF
- 2321 posts since 24 Jun, 2006 from London, England
During the first run you will be able to open the destination ROM folder. Copy your ROMs there, restart the plugin, and wait for a minute for the first load to happen (waveform ROMs need to be descrambled and copied to a cache, which may take a minute). Have fun!wikter wrote: Sat Nov 15, 2025 2:02 pm Instead of publishing a link to files, could you tell us the path you're putting them?
- KVRian
- 1282 posts since 10 Oct, 2002 from Barcelona
My plug-in work flwlessly, it's not me who had the problem.mcbpete wrote: Sun Nov 16, 2025 2:47 pmDuring the first run you will be able to open the destination ROM folder. Copy your ROMs there, restart the plugin, and wait for a minute for the first load to happen (waveform ROMs need to be descrambled and copied to a cache, which may take a minute). Have fun!wikter wrote: Sat Nov 15, 2025 2:02 pm Instead of publishing a link to files, could you tell us the path you're putting them?
- KVRAF
- 19864 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
Where did you get your law degree? So if I steal your music it's "inside legal boundaries" as long as I don't sell it?wikter wrote: Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:37 pmWe're talking here about the hardware emulation, it's not about how to download copyrighted samples. Emulation is not a copy, and as long as it's not sold, just free... it's inside legal boundaries.Teksonik wrote: Sat Nov 15, 2025 3:31 pmThen by extension is this entire thread not in danger of angering a litigious company like Roland?Smeckogeck wrote: Sat Nov 15, 2025 2:02 pm I'm using these ROMs I found on Internet Archive: [MOD REMOVED - PROBABLY NOT LEGAL];
You might want to think it over again. At any rate: "[MOD REMOVED - PROBABLY NOT LEGAL]" is a pretty good indication that the whole discussion is on shaky ground.
This emulation requires the download and use of samples that are quite possibly copyrighted. (none of us know the true legal status of the samples).
All this on a forum where Roland representatives post. But hey if KVR gets sued it's not coming out of my pockets.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
-
- KVRAF
- 2631 posts since 17 Apr, 2004
Let's clear this up... the emulator is prefect legal. The ROMs are proprietary. If you own the hardware and expansion cards, you are probably fine as you own a legal copy thereof. You also don't need to download anything in that case, as you can just dump the ROMs to your computer. *Sharing* links to the ROMs with people who don't own the hardware is definitely not legal, hence the links being removed.
As well as avoiding posting links to copyrighted material, can we please also stop derailing every thread about emulators with the same misinformation about the emulator itself somehow being dodgy, or that talking about the emulator is liable to get people sued. Those sorts of hot takes are from the same school of legal nonsense as the ones claiming that it's only copyright infringement if you sell the material.
As well as avoiding posting links to copyrighted material, can we please also stop derailing every thread about emulators with the same misinformation about the emulator itself somehow being dodgy, or that talking about the emulator is liable to get people sued. Those sorts of hot takes are from the same school of legal nonsense as the ones claiming that it's only copyright infringement if you sell the material.
Voted KVR's resident drunk Robert Smith impersonator (thanks Frantz!)
https://open.spotify.com/artist/2myYesRBRgQB3LkZzEYdt5 | https://soundcloud.com/steevm/
https://open.spotify.com/artist/2myYesRBRgQB3LkZzEYdt5 | https://soundcloud.com/steevm/
- KVRAF
- 19864 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
Where did you get your Juris Doctor degree?sjm wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 12:33 pm Let's clear this up... the emulator is prefect legal. The ROMs are proprietary. If you own the hardware and expansion cards, you are probably fine as you own a legal copy thereof. You also don't need to download anything in that case, as you can just dump the ROMs to your computer. *Sharing* links to the ROMs with people who don't own the hardware is definitely not legal, hence the links being removed.
As well as avoiding posting links to copyrighted material, can we please also stop derailing every thread about emulators with the same misinformation about the emulator itself somehow being dodgy, or that talking about the emulator is liable to get people sued. Those sorts of hot takes are from the same school of legal nonsense as the ones claiming that it's only copyright infringement if you sell the material.
The bottom line is if an emulation requires those who don't own the hardware to download copyrighted material then there could be legal issues. Period. Full Stop.
But if you're so desperate for a free plugin that you'd be willing to compromise your morals and possibly break intellectual property laws (on a site that's dedicated to the creation of intellectual property) then there's really nothing else that can be said.
So to that point I'll just keep using the hardware JV880 once in a awhile and forget about the plugin.
I'll leave the complicated and nuanced issue of legality to you self appointed "experts". I won't read or respond to any further posts on the subject.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
- KVRAF
- 3057 posts since 6 Jul, 2013
Sure. Even people doing nothing wrong *could* have legal issues. There are parts of this world that have a "sue first" attitude, and let's not mention YouTube copyright strikes for material that is claimed owned by anyone who presses the "Claim Now" button.Teksonik wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 1:00 pmThe bottom line is if an emulation requires those who don't own the hardware to download copyrighted material then there could be legal issues. Period. Full Stop.
However, the legality of emulators themselves has generally been tested over the past couple of decades and the general outcome is that emulators themselves aren't considered illegal, as long as the people making/distributing them are not encouraging, providing, or facilitating the distribution of copyright material. Hence why all of them have the attitude of "We're not going to point you to, or supply you with ROMs" and "This emulator is intended for people who legally own the ROMs they are using". If people want to use software for other purposes, that's the individual's choice and responsibility.
But you're correct that any company, who feels like they have the basis for a claim, or wants to try and shut something down, can initiate legal proceedings, and likely that alone would be enough to shut down a personal, or community emulator effort due to the costs of even putting up a counter argument. This is why teams doing emulation have to be careful to really try and stay on the legal side of things.
But that doesn't really have much to do with the *actual* legality of the emulators themselves, more a legal strategy of, as is often the case, who has the most money/clout/lawyers wins. It might well be that legal claims against popular emulators might lose if the argument is simply that a company doesn't like the fact that an emulator exists. At the very least, they would likely have to prove/demonstrate IP/copyright infringement, encouragement, or actual damage, to have a viable winnable legal case. And so far, that has not resulted in significant action against the actual emulators themselves. So yes, as generally understood, the emulators themselves are not regarded as illegal, although they can - like many things including web browsers, computers, etc - be involved with, and facilitate *actual* copyright theft and IP violations.
No self-appointed expert here, just have observed the whole emulator thing for a couple of decades now, particularly as I have a personal interest in archival of old material, often from long-defunct companies, and as I always want to stay on the side of legality in terms of what I distribute, archive, or make available, am usually careful in trying to go about doing things in legitimate ways (like getting official permissions from IP owners where I can, etc).Teksonik wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 1:00 pmI'll leave the complicated and nuanced issue of legality to you self appointed "experts". I won't read or respond to any further posts on the subject.
But this is not a new topic, it is well discussed, not just here in this community, but in others like retro-gaming communities, vintage computer archival and much more. A general understanding of the current state of things is good to have if you want to know roughly how the lines are drawn.
-
- KVRAF
- 2631 posts since 17 Apr, 2004
See the quoted post for the explanation. It's right there!Teksonik wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 1:00 pmThe bottom line is if an emulation requires those who don't own the hardware to download copyrighted material then there could be legal issues. Period. Full Stop.sjm wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 12:33 pm Let's clear this up... the emulator is prefect legal. The ROMs are proprietary. If you own the hardware and expansion cards, you are probably fine as you own a legal copy thereof. You also don't need to download anything in that case, as you can just dump the ROMs to your computer. *Sharing* links to the ROMs with people who don't own the hardware is definitely not legal, hence the links being removed.
Voted KVR's resident drunk Robert Smith impersonator (thanks Frantz!)
https://open.spotify.com/artist/2myYesRBRgQB3LkZzEYdt5 | https://soundcloud.com/steevm/
https://open.spotify.com/artist/2myYesRBRgQB3LkZzEYdt5 | https://soundcloud.com/steevm/
-
- KVRAF
- 3335 posts since 18 May, 2003 from Sweden
Another reason to be a bit careful – I understand that a well known soundsmith with the initials E. P. was intimately connected with the creation of the JV880 patches.
I noticed that one Roland Cloud expansion that seems to be missing from the 1080 etc. VI family is the Voices, which is apparently © of the said Mr E. P. …
/JHS
I noticed that one Roland Cloud expansion that seems to be missing from the 1080 etc. VI family is the Voices, which is apparently © of the said Mr E. P. …
/JHS
If it were easy, anybody could do it!
