Korg multi/poly native - reimagined Mono/Poly Synthesizer plugin
-
- KVRist
- 191 posts since 28 Jun, 2013
Mmmh, I really hope for some update with improvements. I made a lot of suggestions, I guess those never reached Korg? Also the hardware requires more complete remote control, just like Korg's opsix, it is currently quite limited.
-
- KVRian
- 614 posts since 1 May, 2009
Mutli/poly sounds like a 90's VA that never existed, with tons of options that probably couldn't have existed back then. I admire it's flavor, but I see it being for someone who is deep in (not me), who would make good use of it's power.
- KVRAF
- 7794 posts since 20 Jul, 2004 from Clearwater
It's a very accurate prophet emulation for not being a dedicated one. It's nice to have that plus general Korg flavor covered in one synth.
Wavsen.com - Professional mix delivery platform with client approval, watermarking, and portfolio page builder.
- KVRAF
- 18431 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
It never existed because we didn’t have the technology to fully emulate an analog synthesizer in the 90s. Some might say we still don’t, but we’re close enough in most cases.sellyoursoul wrote: Sat Nov 22, 2025 10:35 pm Mutli/poly sounds like a 90's VA that never existed, with tons of options that probably couldn't have existed back then. I admire it's flavor, but I see it being for someone who is deep in (not me), who would make good use of it's power.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- KVRian
- 614 posts since 1 May, 2009
I might have misspoke by saying 90's. I should have said 90's - 00's. The sound of Multi poly reminds me a lot of Roland JP-2000 and Korg MS-2000 lineage, but obviously evolved, rather than anything vintage analog.
- KVRAF
- 18431 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
sellyoursoul wrote: Sun Nov 23, 2025 3:23 am I might have misspoke by saying 90's. I should have said 90's - 00's. The sound of Multi poly reminds me a lot of Roland JP-2000 and Korg MS-2000 lineage, but obviously evolved, rather than anything vintage analog.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
- KVRAF
- 20775 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
sellyoursoul wrote: Sun Nov 23, 2025 3:23 am I might have misspoke by saying 90's. I should have said 90's - 00's. The sound of Multi poly reminds me a lot of Roland JP-2000 and Korg MS-2000 lineage, but obviously evolved, rather than anything vintage analog.

-
- KVRian
- 614 posts since 1 May, 2009
It has that VA bright super-saw characteristic in it's DNA. When I hear it I think Korg MS 2000 and Roland JP 8000. I don't hear vintage analog characteristics. It has it's own sound, which I think is good, but that is the heavy leaning I hear.
-
- KVRian
- 690 posts since 11 Apr, 2006
Vintage doesn't mean dark. Most analog synths are bright as hell if you open the filter all the way. The 70s and early 80s recordings you might have heard them used on might have less highs due to the recording and reproduction technology at the time.
multi/poly does not sound like an MS2000 or JP80x0 any more than any subtractive synth sounds like any other. I used to use both of those synths. Also, the MS2000 (and microkorg) doesn't have supersaws. The VA filters on both of those synths are very 90s VA: harsh when pushed, wonky resonance response across the frequency range, slow response when modulated with an envelope.
They have no similarity to multi/poly, to me. Not any more than any two randomly chosen subtractive synths do. multi/poly also has a bunch of different filter and osc modes with different characteristics.
multi/poly does not sound like an MS2000 or JP80x0 any more than any subtractive synth sounds like any other. I used to use both of those synths. Also, the MS2000 (and microkorg) doesn't have supersaws. The VA filters on both of those synths are very 90s VA: harsh when pushed, wonky resonance response across the frequency range, slow response when modulated with an envelope.
They have no similarity to multi/poly, to me. Not any more than any two randomly chosen subtractive synths do. multi/poly also has a bunch of different filter and osc modes with different characteristics.
-
- KVRian
- 614 posts since 1 May, 2009
I'm not saying that vintage means dark. I'm saying that those 90's-00's VA synths have a bright (and thinner) character to them that I hear in Multi Poly which I don't hear in examples of vintage analog synths and emulations of vintage analog synths. For example, Multi Poly and Repro have a very different general character to them.tumface wrote: Sun Nov 23, 2025 7:59 pm Vintage doesn't mean dark. Most analog synths are bright as hell if you open the filter all the way. The 70s and early 80s recordings you might have heard them used on might have less highs due to the recording and reproduction technology at the time.
multi/poly does not sound like an MS2000 or JP80x0 any more than any subtractive synth sounds like any other. I used to use both of those synths. Also, the MS2000 (and microkorg) doesn't have supersaws. The VA filters on both of those synths are very 90s VA: harsh when pushed, wonky resonance response across the frequency range, slow response when modulated with an envelope.
They have no similarity to multi/poly, to me. Not any more than any two randomly chosen subtractive synths do. multi/poly also has a bunch of different filter and osc modes with different characteristics.
- KVRAF
- 20775 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
Perhaps it would make more sense to compare it against modern VA's like the Iridium or Kyra? Maybe even the RADIAS?
- KVRAF
- 24417 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Not at all.
