The Usual Suspects Announce Roland JP-8080 Emulator (The Real Deal)
- KVRAF
- 24404 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
When it's ready! 
-
- KVRer
- 16 posts since 23 Jun, 2006
Even it's not done the same way than Airwave, it's still an emulation.ffx wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 11:31 am Thx for the comparison, only that the Usual Suspects one is not an emulation, but instead the 1:1 recreation.
Maybe the term emulation is even more technically accurate for the usual supect one
Last edited by frosties on Sat Dec 06, 2025 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 37379 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Technically the emulation is of the chip the software for the synth runs on in the hardware. So it is the same software - not even a 'recreation' - the same. However that for me raises a question, what if the hardware included other components such as an analog filter, separate effects or digital to analog convertors - presumably those get ignored using this approach? I guess with the JP it's not an issue as I believe it didn't come with an analog filter, but I think the Microwave did? That might account for the different sound between the Usual Suspects and Waldorf plugins.frosties wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 11:55 amEven it's not done the same way than Airwave, it's still an emulation.ffx wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 11:31 am Thx for the comparison, only that the Usual Suspects one is not an emulation, but instead the 1:1 recreation.
Maybe the term emulation is even more technically accurate for the usual supect one![]()
-
- KVRist
- 188 posts since 28 Jun, 2013
Ok, you are right, maybe I didn't properly phrase my contradiction. Emulation indeed might be true for all three compared. Yet there is that difference, the Uusual Suspects' one is 1:1 the same algorithms. So how would you call this difference?
- KVRAF
- 24404 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Microwave I had analog filters. Microwave II/XT did not.aMUSEd wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 12:04 pm I guess with the JP it's not an issue as I believe it didn't come with an analog filter, but I think the Microwave did?
-
- KVRian
- 751 posts since 22 Aug, 2002 from on the inside looking out
They sound different because they're not the same synth. Waldorf modelled the microwave 1, which had an analogue filter. TUS emulates the microwave 2, which was fully digital.aMUSEd wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 12:04 pm but I think the Microwave did? That might account for the different sound between the Usual Suspects and Waldorf plugins.
-
- KVRer
- 16 posts since 23 Jun, 2006
I would say emulation when original code, original algorithm, rom (all are linked) is executed by the vst and simulation when component modeling is used. But the world is not only 0 or 1ffx wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 12:29 pm Ok, you are right, maybe I didn't properly phrase my contradiction. Emulation indeed might be true for all three compared. Yet there is that difference, the Uusual Suspects' one is 1:1 the same algorithms. So how would you call this difference?
- KVRAF
- 3639 posts since 21 Nov, 2015
While this might be true, who could spot the difference in a busy mix anyway.suthnear wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 12:48 pmThey sound different because they're not the same synth. Waldorf modelled the microwave 1, which had an analogue filter. TUS emulates the microwave 2, which was fully digital.aMUSEd wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 12:04 pm but I think the Microwave did? That might account for the different sound between the Usual Suspects and Waldorf plugins.
You can be creative in any right place on Earth, and not only in the wealthiest cities. Bring the world feelings from everywhere, and not only feelings of capitalistic or jail environment.
― Aleksey Vaneev
https://linuxdaw.org
― Aleksey Vaneev
https://linuxdaw.org
-
- KVRAF
- 4222 posts since 1 Sep, 2016
Having never played the vast majority of hardware synths out there, and therefore not qualified to judge the accuracy of their emulations, I'm less concerned about 1:1 accuracy and more interested in how they feel to use. UI, workflow, quality of life features etc. I want the process to be fun. But I can totally understand wanting accuracy in an emulation of a beloved synth you used to own.
-
- KVRAF
- 2287 posts since 2 Jul, 2007
Yep and Waldorf did an amazing job at modeling the Microwave 1's analog filter, which makes me hopeful they can do it for the Waldorf M if they choose to release it as a plugin. ( fingers crossed )

INTERFACE: RME ADI-2/4 Pro/Antelope Orion Studio Synergy Core/BAE 1073 MPF Dual/Heritage Audio Successor+SYMPH EQ
SYNTHS: Arturia Polybrute 12/Roland Jupiter X + Juno X/Yamaha Montage M/Yamaha KX88/Softsynths + Samplers
PEDALS: Chase Bliss Mood MK II
SYNTHS: Arturia Polybrute 12/Roland Jupiter X + Juno X/Yamaha Montage M/Yamaha KX88/Softsynths + Samplers
PEDALS: Chase Bliss Mood MK II
- KVRAF
- 13686 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Seattle
Sounds legit.frosties wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 12:55 pmI would say emulation when original code, original algorithm, rom (all are linked) is executed by the vst and simulation when component modeling is used. But the world is not only 0 or 1ffx wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 12:29 pm Ok, you are right, maybe I didn't properly phrase my contradiction. Emulation indeed might be true for all three compared. Yet there is that difference, the Uusual Suspects' one is 1:1 the same algorithms. So how would you call this difference?![]()
I'm not a musician, but I've designed sounds that others use to make music. http://soundcloud.com/obsidiananvil
